Lemma 84.28.1. Let $f : V \to U$ be a morphism of simplicial schemes. Given a quasi-coherent module $\mathcal{F}$ on $U_{Zar}$ the pullback $f^*\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent module on $V_{Zar}$.
84.28 Quasi-coherent modules on simplicial schemes
Proof. Recall that $\mathcal{F}$ is cartesian with $\mathcal{F}_ n$ quasi-coherent, see Lemma 84.12.10. By Lemma 84.2.4 we see that $(f^*\mathcal{F})_ n = f_ n^*\mathcal{F}_ n$ (some details omitted). Hence $(f^*\mathcal{F})_ n$ is quasi-coherent. The same fact and the cartesian property for $\mathcal{F}$ imply the cartesian property for $f^*\mathcal{F}$. Thus $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent by Lemma 84.12.10 again. $\square$
Lemma 84.28.2. Let $f : V \to U$ be a cartesian morphism of simplicial schemes. Assume the morphisms $d^ n_ j : U_ n \to U_{n - 1}$ are flat and the morphisms $V_ n \to U_ n$ are quasi-compact and quasi-separated. For a quasi-coherent module $\mathcal{G}$ on $V_{Zar}$ the pushforward $f_*\mathcal{G}$ is a quasi-coherent module on $U_{Zar}$.
Proof. If $\mathcal{F} = f_* \mathcal{G}$, then $\mathcal{F}_ n = f_{n , *}\mathcal{G}_ n$ by Lemma 84.2.4. The maps $\mathcal{F}(\varphi )$ are defined using the base change maps, see Cohomology, Section 20.17. The sheaves $\mathcal{F}_ n$ are quasi-coherent by Schemes, Lemma 26.24.1 and the fact that $\mathcal{G}_ n$ is quasi-coherent by Lemma 84.12.10. The base change maps along the degeneracies $d^ n_ j$ are isomorphisms by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.2 and the fact that $\mathcal{G}$ is cartesian by Lemma 84.12.10. Hence $\mathcal{F}$ is cartesian by Lemma 84.12.2. Thus $\mathcal{F}$ is quasi-coherent by Lemma 84.12.10. $\square$
Lemma 84.28.3. Let $f : V \to U$ be a cartesian morphism of simplicial schemes. Assume the morphisms $d^ n_ j : U_ n \to U_{n - 1}$ are flat and the morphisms $V_ n \to U_ n$ are quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Then $f^*$ and $f_*$ form an adjoint pair of functors between the categories of quasi-coherent modules on $U_{Zar}$ and $V_{Zar}$.
Proof. We have seen in Lemmas 84.28.1 and 84.28.2 that the statement makes sense. The adjointness property follows immediately from the fact that each $f_ n^*$ is adjoint to $f_{n, *}$. $\square$
Lemma 84.28.4. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes which has a section1. Let $(X/S)_\bullet $ be the simplicial scheme associated to $X \to S$, see Definition 84.27.3. Then pullback defines an equivalence between the category of quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_ S$-modules and the category of quasi-coherent modules on $((X/S)_\bullet )_{Zar}$.
Proof. Let $\sigma : S \to X$ be a section of $f$. Let $(\mathcal{F}, \alpha )$ be a pair as in Lemma 84.12.5. Set $\mathcal{G} = \sigma ^*\mathcal{F}$. Consider the diagram
\[ \xymatrix{ X \ar[r]_-{(\sigma \circ f, 1)} \ar[d]_ f & X \times _ S X \ar[d]^{\text{pr}_0} \ar[r]_-{\text{pr}_1} & X \\ S \ar[r]^\sigma & X } \]
Note that $\text{pr}_0 = d^1_1$ and $\text{pr}_1 = d^1_0$. Hence we see that $(\sigma \circ f, 1)^*\alpha $ defines an isomorphism
\[ f^*\mathcal{G} = (\sigma \circ f, 1)^*\text{pr}_0^*\mathcal{F} \longrightarrow (\sigma \circ f, 1)^*\text{pr}_1^*\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F} \]
We omit the verification that this isomorphism is compatible with $\alpha $ and the canonical isomorphism $\text{pr}_0^*f^*\mathcal{G} \to \text{pr}_1^*f^*\mathcal{G}$. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)