Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

36.4 Total direct image

The following lemma is the analogue of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.5.

Lemma 36.4.1. Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. Assume that f is quasi-separated and quasi-compact.

  1. The functor Rf_* sends D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) into D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ S).

  2. If S is quasi-compact, there exists an integer N = N(X, S, f) such that for an object E of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) with H^ m(E) = 0 for m > 0 we have H^ m(Rf_*E) = 0 for m \geq N.

  3. In fact, if S is quasi-compact we can find N = N(X, S, f) such that for every morphism of schemes S' \to S the same conclusion holds for the functor R(f')_* where f' : X' \to S' is the base change of f.

Proof. Let E be an object of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X). To prove (1) we have to show that Rf_*E has quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves. The question is local on S, hence we may assume S is quasi-compact. Pick N = N(X, S, f) as in Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.5. Thus R^ pf_*\mathcal{F} = 0 for all quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules \mathcal{F} and all p \geq N and the same remains true after base change.

First, assume E is bounded below. We will show (1) and (2) and (3) hold for such E with our choice of N. In this case we can for example use the spectral sequence

R^ pf_*H^ q(E) \Rightarrow R^{p + q}f_*E

(Derived Categories, Lemma 13.21.3), the quasi-coherence of R^ pf_*H^ q(E), and the vanishing of R^ pf_*H^ q(E) for p \geq N to see that (1), (2), and (3) hold in this case.

Next we prove (2) and (3). Say H^ m(E) = 0 for m > 0. Let U \subset S be affine open. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.6 and our choice of N we have H^ p(f^{-1}(U), \mathcal{F}) = 0 for p \geq N and any quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-module \mathcal{F}. Hence we may apply Lemma 36.3.4 to the functor \Gamma (f^{-1}(U), -) to see that

R\Gamma (U, Rf_*E) = R\Gamma (f^{-1}(U), E)

has vanishing cohomology in degrees \geq N. Since this holds for all U \subset S affine open we conclude that H^ m(Rf_*E) = 0 for m \geq N.

Next, we prove (1) in the general case. Recall that there is a distinguished triangle

\tau _{\leq -n - 1}E \to E \to \tau _{\geq -n}E \to (\tau _{\leq -n - 1}E)[1]

in D(\mathcal{O}_ X), see Derived Categories, Remark 13.12.4. By (2) we see that Rf_*\tau _{\leq -n - 1}E has vanishing cohomology sheaves in degrees \geq -n + N. Thus, given an integer q we see that R^ qf_*E is equal to R^ qf_*\tau _{\geq -n}E for some n and the result above applies. \square

Lemma 36.4.2. Let f : X \to S be a quasi-separated and quasi-compact morphism of schemes. Let \mathcal{F}^\bullet be a complex of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules each of which is right acyclic for f_*. Then f_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet represents Rf_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet in D(\mathcal{O}_ S).

Proof. There is always a canonical map f_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to Rf_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet . Our task is to show that this is an isomorphism on cohomology sheaves. As the statement is invariant under shifts it suffices to show that H^0(f_*(\mathcal{F}^\bullet )) \to R^0f_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet is an isomorphism. The statement is local on S hence we may assume S affine. By Lemma 36.4.1 we have R^0f_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet = R^0f_*\tau _{\geq -n}\mathcal{F}^\bullet for all sufficiently large n. Thus we may assume \mathcal{F}^\bullet bounded below. As each \mathcal{F}^ n is right f_*-acyclic by assumption we see that f_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet \to Rf_*\mathcal{F}^\bullet is a quasi-isomorphism by Leray's acyclicity lemma (Derived Categories, Lemma 13.16.7). \square

Lemma 36.4.3. Let X be a quasi-separated and quasi-compact scheme. Let \mathcal{F}^\bullet be a complex of quasi-coherent \mathcal{O}_ X-modules each of which is right acyclic for \Gamma (X, -). Then \Gamma (X, \mathcal{F}^\bullet ) represents R\Gamma (X, \mathcal{F}^\bullet ) in D(\Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X).

Proof. Apply Lemma 36.4.2 to the canonical morphism X \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X)). Some details omitted. \square

Lemma 36.4.4. Let X be a quasi-separated and quasi-compact scheme. For any object K of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) the spectral sequence

E_2^{i, j} = H^ i(X, H^ j(K)) \Rightarrow H^{i + j}(X, K)

of Cohomology, Example 20.29.3 is bounded and converges.

Proof. By the construction of the spectral sequence via Cohomology, Lemma 20.29.1 using the filtration given by \tau _{\leq -p}K, we see that suffices to show that given n \in \mathbf{Z} we have

H^ n(X, \tau _{\leq -p}K) = 0 \text{ for } p \gg 0

and

H^ n(X, K) = H^ n(X, \tau _{\leq -p}K) \text{ for } p \ll 0

The first follows from Lemma 36.3.4 applied with F = \Gamma (X, -) and the bound in Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.5. The second holds whenever -p \leq n for any ringed space (X, \mathcal{O}_ X) and any K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X). \square

Lemma 36.4.5. Let f : X \to S be a quasi-separated and quasi-compact morphism of schemes. Then Rf_* : D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) \to D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ S) commutes with direct sums.

Proof. Let E_ i be a family of objects of D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X) and set E = \bigoplus E_ i. We want to show that the map

\bigoplus Rf_*E_ i \longrightarrow Rf_*E

is an isomorphism. We will show it induces an isomorphism on cohomology sheaves in degree 0 which will imply the lemma. To prove this we may work locally on S, hence we may and do assume that S is quasi-compact. Choose an integer N as in Lemma 36.4.1. Then R^0f_*E = R^0f_*\tau _{\geq -N}E and R^0f_*E_ i = R^0f_*\tau _{\geq -N}E_ i by the lemma cited. Observe that \tau _{\geq -N}E = \bigoplus \tau _{\geq -N}E_ i. Thus we may assume all of the E_ i have vanishing cohomology sheaves in degrees < -N. Next we use the spectral sequences

R^ pf_*H^ q(E) \Rightarrow R^{p + q}f_*E \quad \text{and}\quad R^ pf_*H^ q(E_ i) \Rightarrow R^{p + q}f_*E_ i

(Derived Categories, Lemma 13.21.3) to reduce to the case of a direct sum of quasi-coherent sheaves. This case is handled by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.6.1. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.