Proof.
For a morphism h : V' \to V of \mathcal{D} there is a pullback functor h^* : \mathcal{C}_ V \to \mathcal{C}_{V'} of fibre categories (Categories, Definition 4.33.6). Moreover for U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C}_ V) there is a strongly cartesian morphism h^*U \to U covering h. Restriction along these strongly cartesian morphisms defines a transformation of functors
\mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_ V} \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_{V'}} \circ h^*.
By Example 21.39.3 we obtain the desired restriction map
H_ n(\mathcal{C}_ V, \mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_ V}) \longrightarrow H_ n(\mathcal{C}_{V'}, \mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_{V'}})
Let us denote L_{n, p}(\mathcal{F}) this presheaf, so that L_ n(\mathcal{F}) = L_{n, p}(\mathcal{F})^\# . The canonical map \gamma : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}^+ (Sites, Theorem 7.10.10) defines a canonical map L_{n, p}(\mathcal{F}) \to L_{n, p}(\mathcal{F}^+). We have to prove this map becomes an isomorphism after sheafification.
Let us use the computation of homology given in Example 21.39.2. Denote K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_ V}) the complex associated to the restriction of \mathcal{F} to the fibre category \mathcal{C}_ V. By the remarks above we obtain a presheaf K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}) of complexes
V \longmapsto K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}|_{\mathcal{C}_ V})
whose cohomology presheaves are the presheaves L_{n, p}(\mathcal{F}). Thus it suffices to show that
K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}) \longrightarrow K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}^+)
becomes an isomorphism on sheafification.
Injectivity. Let V be an object of \mathcal{D} and let \xi \in K_ n(\mathcal{F})(V) be an element which maps to zero in K_ n(\mathcal{F}^+)(V). We have to show there exists a covering \{ V_ j \to V\} such that \xi |_{V_ j} is zero in K_ n(\mathcal{F})(V_ j). We write
\xi = \sum (U_{i, n + 1} \to \ldots \to U_{i, 0}, \sigma _ i)
with \sigma _ i \in \mathcal{F}(U_{i, 0}). We arrange it so that each sequence of morphisms U_ n \to \ldots \to U_0 of \mathcal{C}_ V occurs are most once. Since the sums in the definition of the complex K_\bullet are direct sums, the only way this can map to zero in K_\bullet (\mathcal{F}^+)(V) is if all \sigma _ i map to zero in \mathcal{F}^+(U_{i, 0}). By construction of \mathcal{F}^+ there exist coverings \{ U_{i, 0, j} \to U_{i, 0}\} such that \sigma _ i|_{U_{i, 0, j}} is zero. By our construction of the topology on \mathcal{C} we can write U_{i, 0, j} \to U_{i, 0} as the pullback (Categories, Definition 4.33.6) of some morphisms V_{i, j} \to V and moreover each \{ V_{i, j} \to V\} is a covering. Choose a covering \{ V_ j \to V\} dominating each of the coverings \{ V_{i, j} \to V\} . Then it is clear that \xi |_{V_ j} = 0.
Surjectivity. Proof omitted. Hint: Argue as in the proof of injectivity.
\square
Comments (0)