Lemma 86.3.1. Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring and let $I \subset A$ be a ideal. Let $B$ be an object of (86.2.0.2). Then $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{B/A} = R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B_ n/A_ n}$ in $D(B)$.

## 86.3 A naive cotangent complex

Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring and let $I \subset A$ be a ideal. Let $B$ be an $A$-algebra which is $I$-adically complete such that $A/I \to B/IB$ is of finite type, i.e., an object of (86.2.0.2). By Lemma 86.2.2 we can write

for some finitely generated ideal $J$. For a choice of presentation as above we define the naive cotangent complex in this setting by the formula

with terms sitting in degrees $-1$ and $0$ where the map sends the residue class of $g \in J$ to the differential $\text{d}g = \sum (\partial g/\partial x_ i) \text{d}x_ i$. Here the partial derivative is taken by thinking of $g$ as a power series. The following lemma shows that $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{B/A}$ is well defined in $D(B)$, i.e., independent of the chosen presentation, although this could be shown directly by comparing presentations as in Algebra, Section 10.133.

**Proof.**
In fact, the presentation $B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]^\wedge / J$ defines presentations

where

By Artin-Rees (Algebra, Lemma 10.50.2) in the Noetherian ring $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]^\wedge $ (Lemma 86.2.2) we see that we have canonical surjections

for some $c \geq 0$. It follows that $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits J_ n/J_ n^2 = J/J^2$ as any finite $A[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]^\wedge $-module is $I$-adically complete (Algebra, Lemma 10.96.1). Thus

(termwise limit) and the transition maps in the system are termwise surjective. The two term complex $J_ n/J_ n^2 \longrightarrow \bigoplus B_ n \text{d}x_ i$ represents $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B_ n/A_ n}$ by Algebra, Section 10.133. It follows that $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{B/A}$ represents $R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B_ n/A_ n}$ in the derived category by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.81.1. $\square$

Lemma 86.3.2. Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring and let $I \subset A$ be a ideal. Let $B \to C$ be morphism of (86.2.0.2). Then there is an exact sequence

**Proof.**
Choose a presentation $B = A[x_1, \ldots , x_ r]^\wedge /J$. Note that $(B, IB)$ is a pair consisting of a Noetherian ring and an ideal, and $C$ is in the corresponding category (86.2.0.2) for this pair. Hence we can choose a presentation $C = B[y_1, \ldots , y_ s]^\wedge /J'$. Combinging these presentations gives a presentation

Then the reader verifies that we obtain a commutative diagram

with exact rows. Note that the vertical arrow on the left hand side is the tensor product of the arrow defining $\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{B/A}$ with $\text{id}_ C$. The lemma follows by applying the snake lemma (Algebra, Lemma 10.4.1). $\square$

Lemma 86.3.3. With assumptions as in Lemma 86.3.2 assume that $B/I^ nB \to C/I^ nC$ is a local complete intersection homomorphism for all $n$. Then $H^{-1}(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{B/A} \otimes _ B C) \to H^{-1}(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits ^\wedge _{C/A})$ is injective.

**Proof.**
By More on Algebra, Lemma 15.32.6 we see that this holds for the map between naive cotangent complexes of the situation modulo $I^ n$ for all $n$. In other words, we obtain a distinguished triangle in $D(C/I^ nC)$ for every $n$. Using Lemma 86.3.1 this implies the lemma; details omitted.
$\square$

Maps in the derived category out of a complex such as (86.3.0.1) are easy to understand by the result of the following lemma.

Lemma 86.3.4. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $M^\bullet $ be a complex of modules over $R$ with $M^ i = 0$ for $i > 0$ and $M^0$ a projective $R$-module. Let $K^\bullet $ be a second complex.

If $K^ i = 0$ for $i \leq -2$, then $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(R)}(M^\bullet , K^\bullet ) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(R)}(M^\bullet , K^\bullet )$,

If $K^ i = 0$ for $i \leq -3$ and $\alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(R)}(M^\bullet , K^\bullet )$ composed with $K^\bullet \to K^{-2}[2]$ comes from an $R$-module map $a : M^{-2} \to K^{-2}$ with $a \circ d_ M^{-3} = 0$, then $\alpha $ can be represented by a map of complexes $a^\bullet : M^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ with $a^{-2} = a$.

In (2) for any second map of complexes $(a')^\bullet : M^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ representing $\alpha $ with $a = (a')^{-2}$ there exist $h' : M^0 \to K^{-1}$ and $h : M^{-1} \to K^{-2}$ such that

\[ h \circ d_ M^{-2} = 0, \quad (a')^{-1} = a^{-1} + d_ K^{-2} \circ h + h' \circ d_ M^{-1},\quad (a')^0 = a^0 + d_ K^{-1} \circ h' \]

**Proof.**
Set $F^0 = M^0$. Choose a free $R$-module $F^{-1}$ and a surjection $F^{-1} \to M^{-1}$. Choose a free $R$-module $F^{-2}$ and a surjection $F^{-2} \to M^{-2} \times _{M^{-1}} F^{-1}$. Continuing in this way we obtain a quasi-isomorphism $p^\bullet : F^\bullet \to M^\bullet $ which is termwise surjective and with $F^ i$ free for all $i$.

Proof of (1). By Derived Categories, Lemma 13.19.8 we have

If $K^ i = 0$ for $i \leq -2$, then any morphism of complexes $F^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ factors through $p^\bullet $. Similarly, any homotopy $\{ h^ i : F^ i \to K^{i - 1}\} $ factors through $p^\bullet $. Thus (1) holds.

Proof of (2). Choose $b^\bullet : F^\bullet \to K^\bullet $ representing $\alpha $. The composition of $\alpha $ with $K^\bullet \to K^{-2}[2]$ is represented by $b^{-2} : F^{-2} \to K^{-2}$. As this is homotopic to $a \circ p^{-2} : F^{-2} \to M^{-2} \to K^{-2}$, there is a map $h : F^{-1} \to K^{-2}$ such that $b^{-2} = a \circ p^{-2} + h \circ d_ F^{-2}$. Adjusting $b^\bullet $ by $h$ viewed as a homotopy from $F^\bullet $ to $K^\bullet $, we find that $b^{-2} = a \circ p^{-2}$. Hence $b^{-2}$ factors through $p^{-2}$. Since $F^0 = M^0$ the kernel of $p^{-2}$ surjects onto the kernel of $p^{-1}$ (for example because the kernel of $p^\bullet $ is an acyclic complex or by a diagram chase). Hence $b^{-1}$ necessarily factors through $p^{-1}$ as well and we see that (2) holds for these factorizations and $a^0 = b^0$.

Proof of (3) is omitted. Hint: There is a homotopy between $a^\bullet \circ p^\bullet $ and $(a')^\bullet \circ p^\bullet $ and we argue as before that this homotopy factors through $p^\bullet $. $\square$

Lemma 86.3.5. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $M^\bullet $ be a two term complex $M^{-1} \to M^0$ over $R$. If $\varphi , \psi \in \text{End}_{D(R)}(M^\bullet )$ are zero on $H^ i(M^\bullet )$, then $\varphi \circ \psi = 0$.

**Proof.**
Apply Derived Categories, Lemma 13.12.5 to see that $\varphi \circ \psi $ factors through $\tau _{\leq -2}M^\bullet = 0$.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)