The Stacks project

44.2 Hilbert scheme of points

Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $d \geq 0$ be an integer. For a scheme $T$ over $S$ we let

\[ \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T) = \left\{ \begin{matrix} Z \subset X_ T\text{ closed subscheme such that } \\ Z \to T\text{ is finite locally free of degree }d \end{matrix} \right\} \]

If $T' \to T$ is a morphism of schemes over $S$ and if $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$, then the base change $Z_{T'} \subset X_{T'}$ is an element of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T')$. In this way we obtain a functor

\[ \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S} : (\mathit{Sch}/S)^{opp} \longrightarrow \textit{Sets},\quad T \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T) \]

In general $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is an algebraic space (insert future reference here). In this section we will show that $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is representable by a scheme if any finite number of points in a fibre of $X \to S$ are contained in an affine open. If $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is representable by a scheme, we often denote this scheme by $\underline{\mathrm{Hilb}}^ d_{X/S}$.

Lemma 44.2.1. Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The functor $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ satisfies the sheaf property for the fpqc topology (Topologies, Definition 34.9.12).

Proof. Let $\{ T_ i \to T\} _{i \in I}$ be an fpqc covering of schemes over $S$. Set $X_ i = X_{T_ i} = X \times _ S T_ i$. Note that $\{ X_ i \to X_ T\} _{i \in I}$ is an fpqc covering of $X_ T$ (Topologies, Lemma 34.9.7) and that $X_{T_ i \times _ T T_{i'}} = X_ i \times _{X_ T} X_{i'}$. Suppose that $Z_ i \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T_ i)$ is a collection of elements such that $Z_ i$ and $Z_{i'}$ map to the same element of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T_ i \times _ T T_{i'})$. By effective descent for closed immersions (Descent, Lemma 35.34.2) there is a closed immersion $Z \to X_ T$ whose base change by $X_ i \to X_ T$ is equal to $Z_ i \to X_ i$. The morphism $Z \to T$ then has the property that its base change to $T_ i$ is the morphism $Z_ i \to T_ i$. Hence $Z \to T$ is finite locally free of degree $d$ by Descent, Lemma 35.20.30. $\square$

Lemma 44.2.2. Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. If $X \to S$ is of finite presentation, then the functor $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is limit preserving (Limits, Remark 32.6.2).

Proof. Let $T = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i$ be a limit of affine schemes over $S$. We have to show that $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T) = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T_ i)$. Observe that if $Z \to X_ T$ is an element of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$, then $Z \to T$ is of finite presentation. Hence by Limits, Lemma 32.10.1 there exists an $i$, a scheme $Z_ i$ of finite presentation over $T_ i$, and a morphism $Z_ i \to X_{T_ i}$ over $T_ i$ whose base change to $T$ gives $Z \to X_ T$. We apply Limits, Lemma 32.8.5 to see that we may assume $Z_ i \to X_{T_ i}$ is a closed immersion after increasing $i$. We apply Limits, Lemma 32.8.8 to see that $Z_ i \to T_ i$ is finite locally free of degree $d$ after possibly increasing $i$. Then $Z_ i \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T_ i)$ as desired. $\square$

Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $i : X \to Y$ be a closed immersion of schemes over $S$. Then there is a transformation of functors

\[ \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S} \longrightarrow \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S} \]

which maps an element $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$ to $i_ T(Z) \subset Y_ T$ in $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S}$. Here $i_ T : X_ T \to Y_ T$ is the base change of $i$.

Lemma 44.2.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $i : X \to Y$ be a closed immersion of schemes. If $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S}$ is representable by a scheme, so is $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ and the corresponding morphism of schemes $\underline{\mathrm{Hilb}}^ d_{X/S} \to \underline{\mathrm{Hilb}}^ d_{Y/S}$ is a closed immersion.

Proof. Let $T$ be a scheme over $S$ and let $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S}(T)$. Claim: there is a closed subscheme $T_ X \subset T$ such that a morphism of schemes $T' \to T$ factors through $T_ X$ if and only if $Z_{T'} \to Y_{T'}$ factors through $X_{T'}$. Applying this to a scheme $T_{univ}$ representing $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S}$ and the universal object1 $Z_{univ} \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{Y/S}(T_{univ})$ we get a closed subscheme $T_{univ, X} \subset T_{univ}$ such that $Z_{univ, X} = Z_{univ} \times _{T_{univ}} T_{univ, X}$ is a closed subscheme of $X \times _ S T_{univ, X}$ and hence defines an element of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T_{univ, X})$. A formal argument then shows that $T_{univ, X}$ is a scheme representing $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ with universal object $Z_{univ, X}$.

Proof of the claim. Consider $Z' = X_ T \times _{Y_ T} Z$. Given $T' \to T$ we see that $Z_{T'} \to Y_{T'}$ factors through $X_{T'}$ if and only if $Z'_{T'} \to Z_{T'}$ is an isomorphism. Thus the claim follows from the very general More on Flatness, Lemma 38.23.4. However, in this special case one can prove the statement directly as follows: first reduce to the case $T = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ and $Z = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$. After shrinking $T$ further we may assume there is an isomorphism $\varphi : B \to A^{\oplus d}$ as $A$-modules. Then $Z' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B/J)$ for some ideal $J \subset B$. Let $g_\beta \in J$ be a collection of generators and write $\varphi (g_\beta ) = (g_\beta ^1, \ldots , g_\beta ^ d)$. Then it is clear that $T_ X$ is given by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A/(g_\beta ^ j))$. $\square$

Lemma 44.2.4. Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. If $X \to S$ is separated and $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is representable, then $\underline{\mathrm{Hilb}}^ d_{X/S} \to S$ is separated.

Proof. In this proof all unadorned products are over $S$. Let $H = \underline{\mathrm{Hilb}}^ d_{X/S}$ and let $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(H)$ be the universal object. Consider the two objects $Z_1, Z_2 \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(H \times H)$ we get by pulling back $Z$ by the two projections $H \times H \to H$. Then $Z_1 = Z \times H \subset X_{H \times H}$ and $Z_2 = H \times Z \subset X_{H \times H}$. Since $H$ represents the functor $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$, the diagonal morphism $\Delta : H \to H \times H$ has the following universal property: A morphism of schemes $T \to H \times H$ factors through $\Delta $ if and only if $Z_{1, T} = Z_{2, T}$ as elements of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$. Set $Z = Z_1 \times _{X_{H \times H}} Z_2$. Then we see that $T \to H \times H$ factors through $\Delta $ if and only if the morphisms $Z_ T \to Z_{1, T}$ and $Z_ T \to Z_{2, T}$ are isomorphisms. It follows from the very general More on Flatness, Lemma 38.23.4 that $\Delta $ is a closed immersion. In the proof of Lemma 44.2.3 the reader finds an alternative easier proof of the needed result in our special case. $\square$

Lemma 44.2.5. Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of affine schemes. Let $d \geq 0$. Then $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is representable.

Proof. Say $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Then we can choose a closed immersion of $X$ into the spectrum of $R[x_ i; i \in I]$ for some set $I$ (of sufficiently large cardinality. Hence by Lemma 44.2.3 we may assume that $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ where $A = R[x_ i; i \in I]$. We will use Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4 to prove the lemma in this case.

Condition (1) of the lemma follows from Lemma 44.2.1.

For every subset $W \subset A$ of cardinality $d$ we will construct a subfunctor $F_ W$ of $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$. (It would be enough to consider the case where $W$ consists of a collection of monomials in the $x_ i$ but we do not need this.) Namely, we will say that $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$ is in $F_ W(T)$ if and only if the $\mathcal{O}_ T$-linear map

\[ \bigoplus \nolimits _{f \in W} \mathcal{O}_ T \longrightarrow (Z \to T)_*\mathcal{O}_ Z,\quad (g_ f) \longmapsto \sum g_ f f|_ Z \]

is surjective (equivalently an isomorphism). Here for $f \in A$ and $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$ we denote $f|_ Z$ the pullback of $f$ by the morphism $Z \to X_ T \to X$.

Openness, i.e., condition (2)(b) of the lemma. This follows from Algebra, Lemma 10.79.3.

Covering, i.e., condition (2)(c) of the lemma. Since

\[ A \otimes _ R \mathcal{O}_ T = (X_ T \to T)_*\mathcal{O}_{X_ T} \to (Z \to T)_*\mathcal{O}_ Z \]

is surjective and since $(Z \to T)_*\mathcal{O}_ Z$ is finite locally free of rank $d$, for every point $t \in T$ we can find a finite subset $W \subset A$ of cardinality $d$ whose images form a basis of the $d$-dimensional $\kappa (t)$-vector space $((Z \to T)_*\mathcal{O}_ Z)_ t \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{T, t}} \kappa (t)$. By Nakayama's lemma there is an open neighbourhood $V \subset T$ of $t$ such that $Z_ V \in F_ W(V)$.

Representable, i.e., condition (2)(a) of the lemma. Let $W \subset A$ have cardinality $d$. We claim that $F_ W$ is representable by an affine scheme over $R$. We will construct this affine scheme here, but we encourage the reader to think it trough for themselves. Choose a numbering $f_1, \ldots , f_ d$ of the elements of $W$. We will construct a universal element $Z_{univ} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_{univ})$ of $F_ W$ over $T_{univ} = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_{univ})$ which will be the spectrum of

\[ B_{univ} = R_{univ}[e_1, \ldots , e_ d]/ (e_ ke_ l - \sum c_{kl}^ m e_ m) \]

where the $e_ l$ will be the images of the $f_ l$ and where the closed immersion $Z_{univ} \to X_{T_{univ}}$ is given by the ring map

\[ A \otimes _ R R_{univ} \longrightarrow B_{univ} \]

mapping $1 \otimes 1$ to $\sum b^ le_ l$ and $x_ i$ to $\sum b_ i^ le_ l$. In fact, we claim that $F_ W$ is represented by the spectrum of the ring

\[ R_{univ} = R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]/\mathfrak a_{univ} \]

where the ideal $\mathfrak a_{univ}$ is generated by the following elements:

  1. multiplication on $B_{univ}$ is commutative, i.e., $c_{lk}^ m - c_{kl}^ m \in \mathfrak a_{univ}$,

  2. multiplication on $B_{univ}$ is associative, i.e., $c_{lk}^ m c_{m n}^ p - c_{lq}^ p c_{kn}^ q \in \mathfrak a_{univ}$,

  3. $\sum b^ le_ l$ is a multiplicative $1$ in $B_{univ}$, in other words, we should have $(\sum b^ le_ l)e_ k = e_ k$ for all $k$, which means $\sum b^ lc_{lk}^ m - \delta _{km} \in \mathfrak a_{univ}$ (Kronecker delta).

After dividing out by the ideal $\mathfrak a'_{univ}$ of the elements listed sofar we obtain a well defined ring map

\[ \Psi : A \otimes _ R R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]/\mathfrak a'_{univ} \longrightarrow \left(R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]/\mathfrak a'_{univ}\right) [e_1, \ldots , e_ d]/(e_ ke_ l - \sum c_{kl}^ m e_ m) \]

sending $1 \otimes 1$ to $\sum b^ le_ l$ and $x_ i \otimes 1$ to $\sum b_ i^ le_ l$. We need to add some more elements to our ideal because we need

  1. $f_ l$ to map to $e_ l$ in $B_{univ}$. Write $\Psi (f_ l) - e_ l = \sum h_ l^ me_ m$ with $h_ l^ m \in R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]/\mathfrak a'_{univ}$ then we need to set $h_ l^ m$ equal to zero.

Thus setting $\mathfrak a_{univ} \subset R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]$ equal to $\mathfrak a'_{univ} + $ ideal generated by lifts of $h_ l^ m$ to $R[c_{kl}^ m, b^ l, b_ i^ l]$, then it is clear that $F_ W$ is represented by $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_{univ})$. $\square$

Proposition 44.2.6. Let $X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. Let $d \geq 0$. Assume for all $(s, x_1, \ldots , x_ d)$ where $s \in S$ and $x_1, \ldots , x_ d \in X_ s$ there exists an affine open $U \subset X$ with $x_1, \ldots , x_ d \in U$. Then $\mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ is representable by a scheme.

Proof. Either using relative glueing (Constructions, Section 27.2) or using the functorial point of view (Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4) we reduce to the case where $S$ is affine. Details omitted.

Assume $S$ is affine. For $U \subset X$ affine open, denote $F_ U \subset \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}$ the subfunctor such that for a scheme $T/S$ an element $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$ is in $F_ U(T)$ if and only if $Z \subset U_ T$. We will use Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4 and the subfunctors $F_ U$ to conclude.

Condition (1) is Lemma 44.2.1.

Condition (2)(a) follows from the fact that $F_ U = \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{U/S}$ and that this is representable by Lemma 44.2.5. Namely, if $Z \in F_ U(T)$, then $Z$ can be viewed as a closed subscheme of $U_ T$ which is finite locally free of degree $d$ over $T$ and hence $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{U/S}(T)$. Conversely, if $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{U/S}(T)$ then $Z \to U_ T \to X_ T$ is a closed immersion2 and we may view $Z$ as an element of $F_ U(T)$.

Let $Z \in \mathrm{Hilb}^ d_{X/S}(T)$ for some scheme $T$ over $S$. Let

\[ B = (Z \to T)\left((Z \to X_ T \to X)^{-1}(X \setminus U)\right) \]

This is a closed subset of $T$ and it is clear that over the open $T_{Z, U} = T \setminus B$ the restriction $Z_{t'}$ maps into $U_{T'}$. On the other hand, for any $b \in B$ the fibre $Z_ b$ does not map into $U$. Thus we see that given a morphism $T' \to T$ we have $Z_{T'} \in F_ U(T')$ $\Leftrightarrow $ $T' \to T$ factors through the open $T_{Z, U}$. This proves condition (2)(b).

Condition (2)(c) follows from our assumption on $X/S$. All we have to do is show the following: If $T$ is the spectrum of a field and $Z \subset X_ T$ is a closed subscheme, finite flat of degree $d$ over $T$, then $Z \to X_ T \to X$ factors through an affine open $U$ of $X$. This is clear because $Z$ will have at most $d$ points and these will all map into the fibre of $X$ over the image point of $T \to S$. $\square$

Remark 44.2.7. Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. The assumption of Proposition 44.2.6 and hence the conclusion holds in each of the following cases:

  1. $X$ is quasi-affine,

  2. $f$ is quasi-affine,

  3. $f$ is quasi-projective,

  4. $f$ is locally projective,

  5. there exists an ample invertible sheaf on $X$,

  6. there exists an $f$-ample invertible sheaf on $X$, and

  7. there exists an $f$-very ample invertible sheaf on $X$.

Namely, in each of these cases, every finite set of points of a fibre $X_ s$ is contained in a quasi-compact open $U$ of $X$ which comes with an ample invertible sheaf, is isomorphic to an open of an affine scheme, or is isomorphic to an open of $\text{Proj}$ of a graded ring (in each case this follows by unwinding the definitions). Thus the existence of suitable affine opens by Properties, Lemma 28.29.5.

[1] See Categories, Section 4.3
[2] This is clear if $X \to S$ is separated as in this case Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.7 tells us that the immersion $\varphi : Z \to X_ T$ has closed image and hence is a closed immersion by Schemes, Lemma 26.10.4. We suggest the reader skip the rest of this footnote as we don't know of any instance where the assumptions on $X \to S$ hold but $X \to S$ is not separated. In the general case, let $x \in X_ T$ be a point in the closure of $\varphi (Z)$. We have to show that $x \in \varphi (Z)$. Let $t \in T$ be the image of $x$. By assumption on $X \to S$ we can choose an affine open $W \subset X_ T$ containing $x$ and $\varphi (Z_ t)$. Then $\varphi ^{-1}(W)$ is an open containing the whole fibre $Z_ t$ and since $Z \to T$ is closed, we may after replacing $T$ by an open neighbourhood of $t$ assume that $Z = \varphi ^{-1}(W)$. Then $\varphi (Z) \subset W$ is closed by the separated case (as $W \to T$ is separated) and we conclude $x \in \varphi (Z)$.

Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0B94. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.