Lemma 38.29.2. In Situation 38.29.1 consider
Then K is in D^-_{\mathit{QCoh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X).
Lemma 38.29.2. In Situation 38.29.1 consider
Then K is in D^-_{\mathit{QCoh}}(\mathcal{O}_ X).
Proof. The functor DQ_ X exists because X is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, see Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.21.1. Since DQ_ X is a right adjoint it commutes with products and therefore with derived limits. Hence the equality in the statement of the lemma.
By Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.21.4 the functor DQ_ X has bounded cohomological dimension. Hence it suffices to show that R\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits K_ n \in D^-(\mathcal{O}_ X). To see this, let U \subset X be an affine open. Then there is a canonical exact sequence
by Cohomology, Lemma 20.37.1. Since U is affine and K_ n is pseudo-coherent (and hence has quasi-coherent cohomology sheaves by Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.10.1) we see that H^ m(U, K_ n) = H^ m(K_ n)(U) by Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.3.5. Thus we conclude that it suffices to show that K_ n is bounded above independent of n.
Since K_ n is pseudo-coherent we have K_ n \in D^-(\mathcal{O}_{X_ n}). Suppose that a_ n is maximal such that H^{a_ n}(K_ n) is nonzero. Of course a_1 \leq a_2 \leq a_3 \leq \ldots . Note that H^{a_ n}(K_ n) is an \mathcal{O}_{X_ n}-module of finite presentation (Cohomology, Lemma 20.47.9). We have H^{a_ n}(K_{n - 1}) = H^{a_ n}(K_ n) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{X_ n}} \mathcal{O}_{X_{n - 1}}. Since X_{n - 1} \to X_ n is a thickening, it follows from Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma 10.20.1) that if H^{a_ n}(K_ n) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_{X_ n}} \mathcal{O}_{X_{n - 1}} is zero, then H^{a_ n}(K_ n) is zero too. Thus a_ n = a_{n - 1} for all n and we conclude. \square
Comments (0)