Lemma 74.54.5. Let $(R, I)$ be a pair consisting of a ring and an ideal $I$ contained in the Jacobson radical. Set $S = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ and $S_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/I)$. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $R$ whose structure morphism $f : X \to S$ is proper, flat, and of finite presentation. Denote $X_0 = S_0 \times _ S X$. Let $E \in D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ be pseudo-coherent. If the derived restriction $E_0$ of $E$ to $X_0$ is $S_0$-perfect, then $E$ is $S$-perfect.

**Proof.**
Choose a surjective étale morphism $U \to X$ with $U$ affine. Choose a closed immersion $U \to \mathbf{A}^ d_ S$. Set $U_0 = S_0 \times _ S U$. The complex $E_0|_{U_0}$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$ for some $a, b \in \mathbf{Z}$. Let $\overline{x}$ be a geometric point of $X$. We will show that the tor amplitude of $E_{\overline{x}}$ over $R$ is in $[a - d, b]$. This will finish the proof as the tor amplitude can be read off from the stalks by Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.44.10 and Properties of Spaces, Theorem 64.19.12.

Let $x \in |X|$ be the point determined by $\overline{x}$. Recall that $|X| \to |S|$ is closed (by definition of proper morphisms). Since $I$ is contained in the Jacobson radical, any nonempty closed subset of $S$ contains a point of the closed subscheme $S_0$. Hence we can find a specialization $x \leadsto x_0$ in $|X|$ with $x_0 \in |X_0|$. Choose $u_0 \in U_0$ mapping to $x_0$. By Decent Spaces, Lemma 66.7.3 (or by Decent Spaces, Lemma 66.7.2 which applies directly to étale morphisms) we find a specialization $u \leadsto u_0$ in $U$ such that $u$ maps to $x$. We may lift $\overline{x}$ to a geometric point $\overline{u}$ of $U$ lying over $u$. Then we have $E_{\overline{x}} = (E|_ U)_{\overline{u}}$.

Write $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Then $A$ is a flat, finitely presented $R$-algebra which is a quotient of a polynomial $R$-algebra in $d$-variables. The restriction $E|_ U$ corresponds (by Derived Categories of Spaces, Lemmas 73.13.6, 73.4.2, and 73.13.2 and Derived Categories of Schemes, Lemma 36.3.5 and 36.10.2) to a pseudo-coherent object $K$ of $D(A)$. Observe that $E_0$ corresponds to $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A/IA$. Let $\mathfrak q \subset \mathfrak q_0 \subset A$ be the prime ideals corresponding to $u \leadsto u_0$. Then

(some details omitted). Since $A_\mathfrak q \to A_\mathfrak q^{sh}$ is flat, the tor amplitude of this as an $R$-module is the same as the tor amplitude of $K_\mathfrak q$ as an $R$-module (More on Algebra, Lemma 15.65.18). Also, $K_{\mathfrak q}$ is a localization of $K_{\mathfrak q_0}$. Hence it suffices to show that $K_{\mathfrak q_0}$ has tor amplitude in $[a - d, b]$ as a complex of $R$-modules.

Let $I \subset \mathfrak p_0 \subset R$ be the prime ideal corresponding to $f(x_0)$. Then we have

the second equality because $R \to A$ is flat. By our choice of $a, b$ this complex has cohomology only in degrees in the interval $[a, b]$. Thus we may finally apply More on Algebra, Lemma 15.82.9 to $R \to A$, $\mathfrak q_0$, $\mathfrak p_0$ and $K$ to conclude. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)