Lemma 70.8.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a regular Noetherian separated algebraic space over $S$. Then every invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module is isomorphic to

for some effective Cartier divisors $D, D'$ in $X$.

Lemma 70.8.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be a regular Noetherian separated algebraic space over $S$. Then every invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module is isomorphic to

\[ \mathcal{O}_ X(D - D') = \mathcal{O}_ X(D) \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{O}_ X(D')^{\otimes -1} \]

for some effective Cartier divisors $D, D'$ in $X$.

**Proof.**
Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_ X$-module. Choose a dense affine open $U \subset X$ such that $\mathcal{L}|_ U$ is trivial. This is possible because $X$ has a dense open subspace which is a scheme, see Properties of Spaces, Proposition 65.13.3. Denote $s : \mathcal{O}_ U \to \mathcal{L}|_ U$ the trivialization. The complement of $U$ is an effective Cartier divisor $D$. We claim that for some $n > 0$ the map $s$ extends uniquely to a map

\[ s : \mathcal{O}_ X(-nD) \longrightarrow \mathcal{L} \]

The claim implies the lemma because it shows that $\mathcal{L} \otimes _{\mathcal{O}_ X} \mathcal{O}_ X(nD)$ has a regular global section hence is isomorphic to $\mathcal{O}_ X(D')$ for some effective Cartier divisor $D'$ by Lemma 70.7.8. To prove the claim we may work étale locally. Thus we may assume $X$ is an affine Noetherian scheme. Since $\mathcal{O}_ X(-nD) = \mathcal{I}^ n$ where $\mathcal{I} = \mathcal{O}_ X(-D)$ is the ideal sheaf of $D$ in $X$, this case follows from Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.10.5. $\square$

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)