The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

Lemma 15.10.4. Let $(A, I)$ be a Zariski pair. Let $A \to B$ be a finite ring map. Assume

  1. $B/IB = B_1 \times B_2$ is a product of $A/I$-algebras

  2. $A/I \to B_1/IB_1$ is surjective,

  3. $b \in B$ maps to $(1, 0)$ in the product.

Then there exists a monic $f \in A[x]$ with $f(b) = 0$ and $f \bmod I = (x - 1)x^ d$ for some $d \geq 1$.

Proof. By Lemma 15.9.10 we can find an ├ętale ring map $A \to A'$ inducing an isomorphism $A/I \to A'/IA'$ such that $B' = B \otimes _ A A'$ contains an idempotent $e'$ lifting the image of $b$ in $B'/IB'$. Consider the corresponding $A'$-algebra decomposition

\[ B' = B'_1 \times B'_2 \]

which is compatible with the one given in the lemma upon reduction modulo $I$. The map $A' \to B'_1$ is surjective modulo $IA'$. By Nakayama's lemma (Algebra, Lemma 10.19.1) we can find $i \in IA'$ such that after replacing $A'$ by $A'_{1 + i}$ the map $A' \to B'_1$ is surjective. Observe that the image $b'_1 \in B'_1$ of $b$ satisfies $b'_1 - 1 \in IB'_1$. Thus we may pick $a' \in IA'$ mapping to $b'_1 - 1$. On the other hand, the image $b'_2 \in B'_2$ of $b$ is in $IB'_2$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.37.4 there exist a monic polynomial $g(x) = x^ d + \sum a'_ j x^ j$ of degree $d$ with $a'_ j \in IA'$ such that $g(b'_2) = 0$ in $B'_2$. Thus the image $b' = (b'_1, b'_2) \in B'$ of $b$ is a root of the polynomial $(x - 1 - a')g(x)$. We conclude that

\[ (b' - 1)(b')^ d \in \sum \nolimits _{j = 0, \ldots , d} IA' \cdot (b')^ j \]

We claim that this implies

\[ (b - 1)b^ d \in \sum \nolimits _{j = 0, \ldots , d} I \cdot b^ j \]

in $B$. For this it is enough to see that the ring map $A \to A'$ is faithfully flat, because the condition is that the image of $(b - 1)b^ d$ is zero in $B/\sum _{j = 0, \ldots , d} Ib^ j$ (use Algebra, Lemma 10.81.11). The map $A \to A'$ flat because it is ├ętale (Algebra, Lemma 10.141.3). On the other hand, the induced map on spectra is open (see Algebra, Proposition 10.40.8 and use previous lemma referenced) and the image contains $V(I)$. Since $I$ is contained in the Jacobson radical of $A$ we conclude. $\square$


Comments (1)

Comment #3634 by Brian Conrad on

At the end of the proof, replace "radical" with "Jacobson radical".


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0EM0. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.