The Stacks project

62.7 Derived upper shriek for locally quasi-finite morphisms

We can take the derived versions of the functors in Section 62.6 and obtain the following.

Lemma 62.7.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. The functors $f_!$ and $f^!$ of Definition 62.4.4 and Lemma 62.6.1 induce adjoint functors $f_! : D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ and $Rf^! : D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ on derived categories.

In the separated case the functor $f_!$ is defined in Section 62.3.

Proof. This follows immediately from Derived Categories, Lemma 13.30.3, the fact that $f_!$ is exact (Lemma 62.4.5) and hence $Lf_! = f_!$ and the fact that we have enough K-injective complexes of $\Lambda $-modules on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ so that $Rf^!$ is defined. $\square$

Remark 62.7.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. The functor $f_! : D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ of Lemma 62.7.1 sends complexes with torsion cohomology sheaves to complexes with torsion cohomology sheaves. This is immediate from the description of the stalks of $f_!$, see Lemma 62.4.5.

Lemma 62.7.3. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $X = U \cup V$ with $U$ and $V$ open. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. Let $K \in D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$. There is a distinguished triangle

\[ j_{U \cap V!}K|_{U \cap V} \to j_{U!}K|_ U \oplus j_{V!}K|_ V \to K \to j_{U \cap V!}K|_{U \cap V}[1] \]

in $D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ with obvious notation.

Proof. Since the restriction functors and the lower shriek functors we use are exact, it suffices to show for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ the sequence

\[ 0 \to j_{U \cap V!}\mathcal{F}|_{U \cap V} \to j_{U!}\mathcal{F}|_ U \oplus j_{V!}\mathcal{F}|_ V \to \mathcal{F} \to 0 \]

is exact. This can be seen by looking at stalks. $\square$

Lemma 62.7.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme and let $U \subset X$ be the complement. Denote $i : Z \to X$ and $j : U \to X$ the inclusion morphisms. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. Let $K \in D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$. There is a distinguished triangle

\[ j_!j^{-1}K \to K \to i_*i^{-1}K \to j_!j^{-1}K[1] \]

in $D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$.

Proof. Immediate consequence of √Čtale Cohomology, Lemma 59.70.8 and the fact that the functors $j_!$, $j^{-1}$, $i_*$, $i^{-1}$ are exact and hence their derived versions are computed by applying these functors to any complex of sheaves representing $K$. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0F5M. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.