Lemma 63.7.1. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. The functors $f_!$ and $f^!$ of Definition 63.4.4 and Lemma 63.6.1 induce adjoint functors $f_! : D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ and $Rf^! : D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ on derived categories.
63.7 Derived upper shriek for locally quasi-finite morphisms
We can take the derived versions of the functors in Section 63.6 and obtain the following.
In the separated case the functor $f_!$ is defined in Section 63.3.
Proof. This follows immediately from Derived Categories, Lemma 13.30.3, the fact that $f_!$ is exact (Lemma 63.4.5) and hence $Lf_! = f_!$ and the fact that we have enough K-injective complexes of $\Lambda $-modules on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$ so that $Rf^!$ is defined. $\square$
Remark 63.7.2. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a locally quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. The functor $f_! : D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda ) \to D(Y_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ of Lemma 63.7.1 sends complexes with torsion cohomology sheaves to complexes with torsion cohomology sheaves. This is immediate from the description of the stalks of $f_!$, see Lemma 63.4.5.
Lemma 63.7.3. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $X = U \cup V$ with $U$ and $V$ open. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. Let $K \in D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$. There is a distinguished triangle in $D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$ with obvious notation.
\[ j_{U \cap V!}K|_{U \cap V} \to j_{U!}K|_ U \oplus j_{V!}K|_ V \to K \to j_{U \cap V!}K|_{U \cap V}[1] \]
Proof. Since the restriction functors and the lower shriek functors we use are exact, it suffices to show for any abelian sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ the sequence
\[ 0 \to j_{U \cap V!}\mathcal{F}|_{U \cap V} \to j_{U!}\mathcal{F}|_ U \oplus j_{V!}\mathcal{F}|_ V \to \mathcal{F} \to 0 \]
is exact. This can be seen by looking at stalks. $\square$
Lemma 63.7.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $Z \subset X$ be a closed subscheme and let $U \subset X$ be the complement. Denote $i : Z \to X$ and $j : U \to X$ the inclusion morphisms. Let $\Lambda $ be a ring. Let $K \in D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$. There is a distinguished triangle in $D(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$.
\[ j_!j^{-1}K \to K \to i_*i^{-1}K \to j_!j^{-1}K[1] \]
Proof. Immediate consequence of Étale Cohomology, Lemma 59.70.8 and the fact that the functors $j_!$, $j^{-1}$, $i_*$, $i^{-1}$ are exact and hence their derived versions are computed by applying these functors to any complex of sheaves representing $K$. $\square$
Post a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.
In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).
All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Comments (0)