Lemma 42.48.1. Let (S, \delta ) be as in Situation 42.7.1. Let X be locally of finite type over S. Let b : W \to \mathbf{P}^1_ X be a proper morphism of schemes which is an isomorphism over \mathbf{A}^1_ X. Denote i_\infty : W_\infty \to W the inverse image of the divisor D_\infty \subset \mathbf{P}^1_ X with complement \mathbf{A}^1_ X. Then there is a canonical bivariant class
C \in A^0(W_\infty \to X)
with the property that i_{\infty , *}(C \cap \alpha ) = i_{0, *}\alpha for \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) and similarly after any base change by X' \to X locally of finite type.
Proof.
Given \alpha \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X) there exists a \beta \in \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{k + 1}(W) restricting to the flat pullback of \alpha on b^{-1}(\mathbf{A}^1_ X), see Lemma 42.14.2. A second choice of \beta differs from \beta by a cycle supported on W_\infty , see Lemma 42.19.3. Since the normal bundle of the effective Cartier divisor D_\infty \subset \mathbf{P}^1_ X of (42.18.1.1) is trivial, the gysin homomorphism i_\infty ^* kills cycle classes supported on W_\infty , see Remark 42.29.6. Hence setting C \cap \alpha = i_\infty ^*\beta is well defined.
Since W_\infty and W_0 = X \times \{ 0\} are the pullbacks of the rationally equivalent effective Cartier divisors D_0, D_\infty in \mathbf{P}^1_ X, we see that i_\infty ^*\beta and i_0^*\beta map to the same cycle class on W; namely, both represent the class c_1(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^1_ X}(1)) \cap \beta by Lemma 42.29.4. By our choice of \beta we have i_0^*\beta = \alpha as cycles on W_0 = X \times \{ 0\} , see for example Lemma 42.31.1. Thus we see that i_{\infty , *}(C \cap \alpha ) = i_{0, *}\alpha as stated in the lemma.
Observe that the assumptions on b are preserved by any base change by X' \to X locally of finite type. Hence we get an operation C \cap - : \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(X') \to \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _ k(W'_\infty ) by the same construction as above. To see that this family of operations defines a bivariant class, we consider the diagram
\xymatrix{ & & & \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _*(X) \ar[d]^{\text{flat pullback}} \\ \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{* + 1}(W_\infty ) \ar[r] \ar[rd]^0 & \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{* + 1}(W) \ar[d]^{i_\infty ^*} \ar[rr]^{\text{flat pullback}} & & \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _{* + 1}(\mathbf{A}^1_ X) \ar[r] \ar@{..>}[lld]^{C \cap -} & 0 \\ & \mathop{\mathrm{CH}}\nolimits _*(W_\infty ) }
for X as indicated and the base change of this diagram for any X' \to X. We know that flat pullback and i_\infty ^* are bivariant operations, see Lemmas 42.33.2 and 42.33.3. Then a formal argument (involving huge diagrams of schemes and their chow groups) shows that the dotted arrow is a bivariant operation.
\square
Comments (0)