Lemma 57.16.3. Let S be a Noetherian scheme. Let s \in S. Let p : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes over S. Assume
Y \to S and X \to S proper,
X is flat over S,
X_ s \to Y_ s an isomorphism.
Then there exists an open neighbourhood U \subset S of s such that the base change X_ U \to Y_ U is an isomorphism.
Proof.
The morphism p is proper by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.6. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.21.2 there is an open Y_ s \subset V \subset Y such that p|_{p^{-1}(V)} : p^{-1}(V) \to V is finite. By More on Morphisms, Theorem 37.16.1 there is an open X_ s \subset U \subset X such that p|_ U : U \to Y is flat. After removing the images of X \setminus U and Y \setminus V (which are closed subsets not containing s) we may assume p is flat and finite. Then p is open (Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.10) and Y_ s \subset p(X) \subset Y hence after shrinking S we may assume p is surjective. As p_ s : X_ s \to Y_ s is an isomorphism, the map
p^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_ Y \longrightarrow p_*\mathcal{O}_ X
of coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules (p is finite) becomes an isomorphism after pullback by i : Y_ s \to Y (by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.1 for example). By Nakayama's lemma, this implies that \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to (p_*\mathcal{O}_ X)_ y is surjective for all y \in Y_ s. Hence there is an open Y_ s \subset V \subset Y such that p^\sharp |_ V is surjective (Modules, Lemma 17.9.4). Hence after shrinking S once more we may assume p^\sharp is surjective which means that p is a closed immersion (as p is already finite). Thus now p is a surjective flat closed immersion of Noetherian schemes and hence an isomorphism, see Morphisms, Section 29.26.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #5410 by Shogōki on
Comment #5640 by Johan on