Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 57.16.3. Let S be a Noetherian scheme. Let s \in S. Let p : X \to Y be a morphism of schemes over S. Assume

  1. Y \to S and X \to S proper,

  2. X is flat over S,

  3. X_ s \to Y_ s an isomorphism.

Then there exists an open neighbourhood U \subset S of s such that the base change X_ U \to Y_ U is an isomorphism.

Proof. The morphism p is proper by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.6. By Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.21.2 there is an open Y_ s \subset V \subset Y such that p|_{p^{-1}(V)} : p^{-1}(V) \to V is finite. By More on Morphisms, Theorem 37.16.1 there is an open X_ s \subset U \subset X such that p|_ U : U \to Y is flat. After removing the images of X \setminus U and Y \setminus V (which are closed subsets not containing s) we may assume p is flat and finite. Then p is open (Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.10) and Y_ s \subset p(X) \subset Y hence after shrinking S we may assume p is surjective. As p_ s : X_ s \to Y_ s is an isomorphism, the map

p^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_ Y \longrightarrow p_*\mathcal{O}_ X

of coherent \mathcal{O}_ Y-modules (p is finite) becomes an isomorphism after pullback by i : Y_ s \to Y (by Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.5.1 for example). By Nakayama's lemma, this implies that \mathcal{O}_{Y, y} \to (p_*\mathcal{O}_ X)_ y is surjective for all y \in Y_ s. Hence there is an open Y_ s \subset V \subset Y such that p^\sharp |_ V is surjective (Modules, Lemma 17.9.4). Hence after shrinking S once more we may assume p^\sharp is surjective which means that p is a closed immersion (as p is already finite). Thus now p is a surjective flat closed immersion of Noetherian schemes and hence an isomorphism, see Morphisms, Section 29.26. \square


Comments (2)

Comment #5410 by Shogōki on

In sentences concerning properties of , you meant "" when you say "": "... becomes an isomorphism after pullback by "; "... is surjective for all $y \in \emph{Y_s}."

Also from the proof I think the statement of this lemma should be that one finds this open neighborhood U in S, such that the base change of p to U becomes an \emph{isomorphism}.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.