Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 88.17.3. The property P(\varphi )=\varphi is rig-smooth” on arrows of \textit{WAdm}^{Noeth} is a local property as defined in Formal Spaces, Remark 87.21.5.

Proof. Let us recall what the statement signifies. First, \textit{WAdm}^{Noeth} is the category whose objects are adic Noetherian topological rings and whose morphisms are continuous ring homomorphisms. Consider a commutative diagram

\xymatrix{ B \ar[r] & (B')^\wedge \\ A \ar[r] \ar[u]^\varphi & (A')^\wedge \ar[u]_{\varphi '} }

satisfying the following conditions: A and B are adic Noetherian topological rings, A \to A' and B \to B' are étale ring maps, (A')^\wedge = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A'/I^ nA' for some ideal of definition I \subset A, (B')^\wedge = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits B'/J^ nB' for some ideal of definition J \subset B, and \varphi : A \to B and \varphi ' : (A')^\wedge \to (B')^\wedge are continuous. Note that (A')^\wedge and (B')^\wedge are adic Noetherian topological rings by Formal Spaces, Lemma 87.21.1. We have to show

  1. \varphi is rig-smooth \Rightarrow \varphi ' is rig-smooth,

  2. if B \to B' faithfully flat, then \varphi ' is rig-smooth \Rightarrow \varphi is rig-smooth, and

  3. if A \to B_ i is rig-smooth for i = 1, \ldots , n, then A \to \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} B_ i is rig-smooth.

The equivalent conditions of Lemma 88.11.1 satisfy conditions (1), (2), and (3). Thus in verifying (1), (2), and (3) for the property “rig-smooth” we may already assume our ring maps satisfy the equivalent conditions of Lemma 88.11.1 in each case.

Pick an ideal of definition I \subset A. By the remarks above the topology on each ring in the diagram is the I-adic topology and B, (A')^\wedge , and (B')^\wedge are in the category (88.2.0.2) for (A, I). Since A \to A' and B \to B' are étale the complexes \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{A'/A} and \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B'/B} are zero and hence \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(A')^\wedge /A}^\wedge and \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /B}^\wedge are zero by Lemma 88.3.2. Applying Lemma 88.3.5 to A \to (A')^\wedge \to (B')^\wedge we get isomorphisms

H^ i(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /(A')^\wedge }^\wedge ) \to H^ i(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /A}^\wedge )

Thus \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /A}^\wedge \to \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /(A')^\wedge } is a quasi-isomorphism. The ring maps B/I^ nB \to B'/I^ nB' are étale and hence are local complete intersections (Algebra, Lemma 10.143.2). Hence we may apply Lemmas 88.3.5 and 88.3.6 to A \to B \to (B')^\wedge and we get isomorphisms

H^ i(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge ) \to H^ i(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /A}^\wedge )

We conclude that \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge \to \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /A}^\wedge is a quasi-isomorphism. Combining these two observations we obtain that

\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /(A')^\wedge }^\wedge \cong \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge

in D((B')^\wedge ). With these preparations out of the way we can start the actual proof.

Proof of (1). Assume \varphi is rig-smooth. Then there exists a c \geq 0 such that \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_ B(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge , N) is annihilated by I^ c for every B-module N. By More on Algebra, Lemmas 15.84.6 and 15.84.7 this property is preserved under base change by B \to (B')^\wedge . Hence \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_{(B')^\wedge }(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /(A')^\wedge }^\wedge , N) is annihilated by I^ c(A')^\wedge for all (B')^\wedge -modules N which tells us that \varphi ' is rig-smooth. This proves (1).

To prove (2) assume B \to B' is faithfully flat and that \varphi ' is rig-smooth. Then there exists a c \geq 0 such that \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_{(B')^\wedge }(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{(B')^\wedge /(A')^\wedge }^\wedge , N') is annihilated by I^ c(B')^\wedge for every (B')^\wedge -module N'. The composition B \to B' \to (B')^\wedge is flat (Algebra, Lemma 10.97.2) hence for any B-module N we have

\mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_ B(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge , N) \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge = \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_{(B')^\wedge }(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge , N \otimes _ B (B')^\wedge )

by More on Algebra, Lemma 15.99.2 part (3) (minor details omitted). Thus we see that this module is annihilated by I^ c. However, B \to (B')^\wedge is actually faithfully flat by our assumption that B \to B' is faithfully flat (Formal Spaces, Lemma 87.19.14). Thus we conclude that \mathop{\mathrm{Ext}}\nolimits ^1_ B(\mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge , N) is annihilated by I^ c. Hence \varphi is rig-smooth. This proves (2).

To prove (3), setting B = \prod _{i = 1, \ldots , n} B_ i we just observe that \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B/A}^\wedge is the direct sum of the complexes \mathop{N\! L}\nolimits _{B_ i/A}^\wedge viewed as complexes of B-modules. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.