Definition 100.50.1. We say an algebraic stack $\mathcal{X}$ is *integral* if it is reduced, decent, $\mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X}$ is quasi-compact, and $|\mathcal{X}|$ is irreducible.

## 100.50 Integral algebraic stacks

This section is the analogue of Spaces over Fields, Section 71.4. Motivated by the considerations in that section and by the result of Proposition 100.49.3 we define an integral algebraic stack as follows (and it does not conflict with the already existing definitions of integral schemes and integral algebraic spaces).

Note that if $\mathcal{X}$ is quasi-separated, then for it to be integral, it suffices that $\mathcal{X}$ is reduced and that $|\mathcal{X}|$ is irreducible, see Lemma 100.50.3.

Lemma 100.50.2. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an integral algebraic stack. Then

$|\mathcal{X}|$ is sober, irreducible, and has a unique generic point,

there exists an open substack $\mathcal{U} \subset \mathcal{X}$ which is a gerbe over an integral scheme $U$.

**Proof.**
Proposition 100.49.3 tells us that $|\mathcal{X}|$ is sober. Of course it is also irreducible and hence has a unique generic point $x$ (by the definition of sobriety). Proposition 100.29.1 shows the existence of a dense open $\mathcal{U} \subset \mathcal{X}$ which is a gerbe over an algebraic space $U$. Then $U$ is a decent algebraic space by Lemma 100.48.5 (and the fact that $\mathcal{U}$ is decent by Lemma 100.48.3). Since $|U| = |\mathcal{U}|$ we see that $|U|$ is irreducible. Finally, since $\mathcal{U}$ is reduced the morphism $\mathcal{U} \to U$ factors through $U_{red}$, see Properties of Stacks, Lemma 99.10.3. Now since $\mathcal{U} \to U$ is flat, locally of finite presentation, and surjective (Lemma 100.28.8), this implies that $U = U_{red}$, i.e., $U$ is reduced (small detail omitted). It follows that $U$ is an integral algebraic space, see Spaces over Fields, Definition 71.4.1. Then finally, we may replace $U$ (and correspondingly $\mathcal{U}$) by an open subspace and assume that $U$ is an integral scheme, see discussion in Spaces over Fields, Section 71.4.
$\square$

Lemma 100.50.3. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack which is reduced and quasi-separated and whose associated topological space $|\mathcal{X}|$ is irreducible. Then $\mathcal{X}$ is integral.

**Proof.**
If $\mathcal{X}$ is quasi-separated, then $\mathcal{X}$ is decent by Lemma 100.48.2. If $\mathcal{X}$ is quasi-separated, then $\Delta : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{X} \times \mathcal{X}$ is quasi-compact, hence $\mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X}$ is quasi-compact as the base change of $\Delta $ by $\Delta $, see Lemma 100.7.3. Thus we see that all the hypotheses of Definition 100.50.1 hold (and we also see that we may replace “quasi-separated” by “$\Delta _\mathcal {X}$ is quasi-compact”).
$\square$

Lemma 100.50.4. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be a decent algebraic stack such that $\mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X}$ is quasi-compact. There are canonical bijections between the following sets:

the set of points of $\mathcal{X}$, i.e., $|\mathcal{X}|$,

the set of irreducible closed subsets of $|\mathcal{X}|$,

the set of integral closed substacks of $\mathcal{X}$.

The bijection from (1) to (2) sends $x$ to $\overline{\{ x\} }$. The bijection from (3) to (2) sends $\mathcal{Z}$ to $|\mathcal{Z}|$.

**Proof.**
Our map defines a bijection between (1) and (2) as $|\mathcal{X}|$ is sober by Proposition 100.49.3. Given $T \subset |\mathcal{X}|$ closed and irreducible, there is a unique reduced closed substack $\mathcal{Z} \subset \mathcal{X}$ such that $|\mathcal{Z}| = T$, namely, $\mathcal{Z}$ is the reduced induced subspace structure on $T$, see Properties of Stacks, Definition 99.10.4. Then $\mathcal{Z}$ is an integral algebraic stack because it is decent (Lemma 100.48.3), the morphism $\mathcal{I}_\mathcal {Z} \to \mathcal{Z}$ is quasi-compact (as the base change of $\mathcal{I}_\mathcal {X} \to \mathcal{X}$, see Lemma 100.5.6), $\mathcal{Z}$ is reduced, and $|\mathcal{Z}|$ is irreducible.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)