The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

10.124 Dimension of fibres

We study the behaviour of dimensions of fibres, using Zariski's main theorem. Recall that we defined the dimension $\dim _ x(X)$ of a topological space $X$ at a point $x$ in Topology, Definition 5.10.1.

Definition 10.124.1. Suppose that $R \to S$ is of finite type, and let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime lying over a prime $\mathfrak p$ of $R$. We define the relative dimension of $S/R$ at $\mathfrak q$, denoted $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R)$, to be the dimension of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p))$ at the point corresponding to $\mathfrak q$. We let $\dim (S/R)$ be the supremum of $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R)$ over all $\mathfrak q$. This is called the relative dimension of $S/R$.

In particular, $R \to S$ is quasi-finite at $\mathfrak q$ if and only if $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) = 0$. The following lemma is more or less a reformulation of Zariski's Main Theorem.

Lemma 10.124.2. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime. Suppose that $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) = n$. There exists a $g \in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q$ such that $S_ g$ is quasi-finite over a polynomial algebra $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$.

Proof. The ring $\overline{S} = S \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ is of finite type over $\kappa (\mathfrak p)$. Let $\overline{\mathfrak q}$ be the prime of $\overline{S}$ corresponding to $\mathfrak q$. By definition of the dimension of a topological space at a point there exists an open $U \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\overline{S})$ with $\overline{q} \in U$ and $\dim (U) = n$. Since the topology on $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(\overline{S})$ is induced from the topology on $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ (see Remark 10.16.8), we can find a $g \in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q$ with image $\overline{g} \in \overline{S}$ such that $D(\overline{g}) \subset U$. Thus after replacing $S$ by $S_ g$ we see that $\dim (\overline{S}) = n$.

Next, choose generators $x_1, \ldots , x_ N$ for $S$ as an $R$-algebra. By Lemma 10.114.4 there exist elements $y_1, \ldots , y_ n$ in the $\mathbf{Z}$-subalgebra of $S$ generated by $x_1, \ldots , x_ N$ such that the map $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S$, $t_ i \mapsto y_ i$ has the property that $\kappa (\mathfrak p)[t_1\ldots , t_ n] \to \overline{S}$ is finite. In particular, $S$ is quasi-finite over $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ at $\mathfrak q$. Hence, by Lemma 10.122.13 we may replace $S$ by $S_ g$ for some $g\in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q$ such that $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S$ is quasi-finite. $\square$

Lemma 10.124.3. Let $R \to S$ be a ring map. Let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime lying over the prime $\mathfrak p$ of $R$. Assume

  1. $R \to S$ is of finite type,

  2. $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) = n$, and

  3. $\text{trdeg}_{\kappa (\mathfrak p)}\kappa (\mathfrak q) = r$.

Then there exist $f \in R$, $f \not\in \mathfrak p$, $g \in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q$ and a quasi-finite ring map

\[ \varphi : R_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \longrightarrow S_ g \]

such that $\varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak qS_ g) = (\mathfrak p, x_{r + 1}, \ldots , x_ n)R_ f[x_{r + 1}, \ldots , x_ n]$

Proof. After replacing $S$ by a principal localization we may assume there exists a quasi-finite ring map $\varphi : R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S$, see Lemma 10.124.2. Set $\mathfrak q' = \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q)$. Let $\overline{\mathfrak q}' \subset \kappa (\mathfrak p)[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ be the prime corresponding to $\mathfrak q'$. By Lemma 10.114.6 there exists a finite ring map $\kappa (\mathfrak p)[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to \kappa (\mathfrak p)[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ such that the inverse image of $\overline{\mathfrak q}'$ is $(x_{r + 1}, \ldots , x_ n)$. Let $\overline{h}_ i \in \kappa (\mathfrak p)[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ be the image of $x_ i$. We can find an element $f \in R$, $f \not\in \mathfrak p$ and $h_ i \in R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ which map to $\overline{h}_ i$ in $\kappa (\mathfrak p)[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$. Then the ring map

\[ R_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \longrightarrow R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \]

becomes finite after tensoring with $\kappa (\mathfrak p)$. In particular, $R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ is quasi-finite over $R_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$ at the prime $\mathfrak q'R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$. Hence, by Lemma 10.122.13 there exists a $g \in R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q'R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ such that $R_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \to R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n, 1/g]$ is quasi-finite. Thus we see that the composition

\[ R_ f[x_1, \ldots , x_ n] \longrightarrow R_ f[t_1, \ldots , t_ n, 1/g] \longrightarrow S_{\varphi (g)} \]

is quasi-finite and we win. $\square$

Lemma 10.124.4. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime lying over $\mathfrak p \subset R$. If $R \to S$ is quasi-finite at $\mathfrak q$, then $\dim (S_{\mathfrak q}) \leq \dim (R_{\mathfrak p})$.

Proof. If $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is Noetherian (and hence $S_{\mathfrak q}$ Noetherian since it is essentially of finite type over $R_{\mathfrak p}$) then this follows immediately from Lemma 10.111.6 and the definitions. In the general case, let $S'$ be the integral closure of $R_\mathfrak p$ in $S_\mathfrak p$. By Zariski's Main Theorem 10.122.12 we have $S_{\mathfrak q} = S'_{\mathfrak q'}$ for some $\mathfrak q' \subset S'$ lying over $\mathfrak q$. By Lemma 10.111.3 we have $\dim (S') \leq \dim (R_\mathfrak p)$ and hence a fortiori $\dim (S_\mathfrak q) = \dim (S'_{\mathfrak q'}) \leq \dim (R_\mathfrak p)$. $\square$

slogan

Lemma 10.124.5. Let $k$ be a field. Let $S$ be a finite type $k$-algebra. Suppose there is a quasi-finite $k$-algebra map $k[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \subset S$. Then $\dim (S) \leq n$.

Proof. By Lemma 10.113.1 the dimension of any local ring of $k[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ is at most $n$. Thus the result follows from Lemma 10.124.4. $\square$

Lemma 10.124.6. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $\mathfrak q \subset S$ be a prime. Suppose that $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) = n$. There exists an open neighbourhood $V$ of $\mathfrak q$ in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ such that $\dim _{\mathfrak q'}(S/R) \leq n$ for all $\mathfrak q' \in V$.

Proof. By Lemma 10.124.2 we see that we may assume that $S$ is quasi-finite over a polynomial algebra $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$. Considering the fibres, we reduce to Lemma 10.124.5. $\square$

In other words, the lemma says that the set of points where the fibre has dimension $\leq n$ is open in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. The next lemma says that formation of this open commutes with base change. If the ring map is of finite presentation then this set is quasi-compact open (see below).

Lemma 10.124.7. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $R \to R'$ be any ring map. Set $S' = R' \otimes _ R S$ and denote $f : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S') \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ the associated map on spectra. Let $n \geq 0$. The inverse image $f^{-1}(\{ \mathfrak q \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \mid \dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) \leq n\} )$ is equal to $\{ \mathfrak q' \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S') \mid \dim _{\mathfrak q'}(S'/R') \leq n\} $.

Proof. The condition is formulated in terms of dimensions of fibre rings which are of finite type over a field. Combined with Lemma 10.115.6 this yields the lemma. $\square$

Lemma 10.124.8. Let $R \to S$ be a ring homomorphism of finite presentation. Let $n \geq 0$. The set

\[ V_ n = \{ \mathfrak q \in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \mid \dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/R) \leq n\} \]

is a quasi-compact open subset of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$.

Proof. It is open by Lemma 10.124.6. Let $S = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/(f_1, \ldots , f_ m)$ be a presentation of $S$. Let $R_0$ be the $\mathbf{Z}$-subalgebra of $R$ generated by the coefficients of the polynomials $f_ i$. Let $S_0 = R_0[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/(f_1, \ldots , f_ m)$. Then $S = R \otimes _{R_0} S_0$. By Lemma 10.124.7 $V_ n$ is the inverse image of an open $V_{0, n}$ under the quasi-compact continuous map $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_0)$. Since $S_0$ is Noetherian we see that $V_{0, n}$ is quasi-compact. $\square$

Lemma 10.124.9. Let $R$ be a valuation ring with residue field $k$ and field of fractions $K$. Let $S$ be a domain containing $R$ such that $S$ is of finite type over $R$. If $S \otimes _ R k$ is not the zero ring then

\[ \dim (S \otimes _ R k) = \dim (S \otimes _ R K) \]

In fact, $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S \otimes _ R k)$ is equidimensional.

Proof. It suffices to show that $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/k)$ is equal to $\dim (S \otimes _ R K)$ for every prime $\mathfrak q$ of $S$ containing $\mathfrak m_ RS$. Pick such a prime. By Lemma 10.124.6 the inequality $\dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/k) \geq \dim (S \otimes _ R K)$ holds. Set $n = \dim _{\mathfrak q}(S/k)$. By Lemma 10.124.2 after replacing $S$ by $S_ g$ for some $g \in S$, $g \not\in \mathfrak q$ there exists a quasi-finite ring map $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S$. If $\dim (S \otimes _ R K) < n$, then $K[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S \otimes _ R K$ has a nonzero kernel. Say $f = \sum a_ I t_1^{i_1}\ldots t_ n^{i_ n}$. After dividing $f$ by a nonzero coefficient of $f$ with minimal valuation, we may assume $f\in R[t_1, \ldots , t_ n]$ and some $a_ I$ does not map to zero in $k$. Hence the ring map $k[t_1, \ldots , t_ n] \to S \otimes _ R k$ has a nonzero kernel which implies that $\dim (S \otimes _ R k) < n$. Contradiction. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 00QC. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.