Lemma 64.8.1. Let $S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}_{fppf})$. Let $F$ and $G$ be sheaves on $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}^{opp}$ and denote $F \amalg G$ the coproduct in the category of sheaves. The map $F \to F \amalg G$ is representable by open and closed immersions.

## 64.8 Glueing algebraic spaces

In this section we really start abusing notation and not distinguish between schemes and the spaces they represent.

**Proof.**
Let $U$ be a scheme and let $\xi \in (F \amalg G)(U)$. Recall the coproduct in the category of sheaves is the sheafification of the coproduct presheaf (Sites, Lemma 7.10.13). Thus there exists an fppf covering $\{ g_ i : U_ i \to U\} _{i \in I}$ and a disjoint union decomposition $I = I' \amalg I''$ such that $U_ i \to U \to F \amalg G$ factors through $F$, resp. $G$ if and only if $i \in I'$, resp. $i \in I''$. Since $F$ and $G$ have empty intersection in $F \amalg G$ we conclude that $U_ i \times _ U U_ j$ is empty if $i \in I'$ and $j \in I''$. Hence $U' = \bigcup _{i \in I'} g_ i(U_ i)$ and $U'' = \bigcup _{i \in I''} g_ i(U_ i)$ are disjoint open (Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.10) subschemes of $U$ with $U = U' \amalg U''$. We omit the verification that $U' = U \times _{F \amalg G} F$.
$\square$

Lemma 64.8.2. Let $S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}_{fppf})$. Let $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$. Given a set $I$ and sheaves $F_ i$ on $\mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$, if $U \cong \coprod _{i\in I} F_ i$ as sheaves, then each $F_ i$ is representable by an open and closed subscheme $U_ i$ and $U \cong \coprod U_ i$ as schemes.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 64.8.1 the map $F_ i \to U$ is representable by open and closed immersions. Hence $F_ i$ is representable by an open and closed subscheme $U_ i$ of $U$. We have $U = \coprod U_ i$ because we have $U \cong \coprod F_ i$ as sheaves and we can test the equality on points.
$\square$

Lemma 64.8.3. Let $S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}_{fppf})$. Let $F$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Given a set $I$ and sheaves $F_ i$ on $\mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$, if $F \cong \coprod _{i\in I} F_ i$ as sheaves, then each $F_ i$ is an algebraic space over $S$.

**Proof.**
The representability of $F \to F \times F$ implies that each diagonal morphism $F_ i \to F_ i \times F_ i$ is representable (immediate from the definitions and the fact that $F \times _{(F \times F)} (F_ i \times F_ i) = F_ i$). Choose a scheme $U$ in $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to F$ (this exist by hypothesis). The base change $U \times _ F F_ i \to F_ i$ is surjective and étale by Lemma 64.5.5. On the other hand, $U \times _ F F_ i$ is a scheme by Lemma 64.8.1. Thus we have verified all the conditions in Definition 64.6.1 and $F_ i$ is an algebraic space.
$\square$

The condition on the size of $I$ and the $F_ i$ in the following lemma may be ignored by those not worried about set theoretic questions.

Lemma 64.8.4. Let $S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}_{fppf})$. Suppose given a set $I$ and algebraic spaces $F_ i$, $i \in I$. Then $F = \coprod _{i \in I} F_ i$ is an algebraic space provided $I$, and the $F_ i$ are not too “large”: for example if we can choose surjective étale morphisms $U_ i \to F_ i$ such that $\coprod _{i \in I} U_ i$ is isomorphic to an object of $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$, then $F$ is an algebraic space.

**Proof.**
By construction $F$ is a sheaf. We omit the verification that the diagonal morphism of $F$ is representable. Finally, if $U$ is an object of $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$ isomorphic to $\coprod _{i \in I} U_ i$ then it is straightforward to verify that the resulting map $U \to \coprod F_ i$ is surjective and étale.
$\square$

Here is the analogue of Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4.

Lemma 64.8.5. Let $S \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathit{Sch}_{fppf})$. Let $F$ be a presheaf of sets on $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Assume

$F$ is a sheaf,

there exists an index set $I$ and subfunctors $F_ i \subset F$ such that

Then $F$ is an algebraic space.

**Proof.**
Let $T$ be an object of $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Let $T \to F$ be a morphism. By assumption (2)(b) and (2)(c) the fibre product $F_ i \times _ F T$ is representable by an open subscheme $V_ i \subset T$. It follows that $(\coprod F_ i) \times _ F T$ is represented by the scheme $\coprod V_ i$ over $T$. By assumption (2)(d) there exists an fppf covering $\{ T_ j \to T\} _{j \in J}$ such that $T_ j \to T \to F$ factors through $F_ i$, $i = i(j)$. Hence $T_ j \to T$ factors through the open subscheme $V_{i(j)} \subset T$. Since $\{ T_ j \to T\} $ is jointly surjective, it follows that $T = \bigcup V_ i$ is an open covering. In particular, the transformation of functors $\coprod F_ i \to F$ is representable and surjective in the sense of Definition 64.5.1 (see Remark 64.5.2 for a discussion).

Next, let $T' \to F$ be a second morphism from an object in $(\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf}$. Write as above $T' = \bigcup V'_ i$ with $V'_ i = T' \times _ F F_ i$. To show that the diagonal $F \to F \times F$ is representable we have to show that $G = T \times _ F T'$ is representable, see Lemma 64.5.10. Consider the subfunctors $G_ i = G \times _ F F_ i$. Note that $G_ i = V_ i \times _{F_ i} V'_ i$, and hence is representable as $F_ i$ is an algebraic space. By the above the $G_ i$ form a Zariski covering of $G$. Hence by Schemes, Lemma 26.15.4 we see $G$ is representable.

Choose a scheme $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits ((\mathit{Sch}/S)_{fppf})$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to \coprod F_ i$ (this exists by hypothesis). We may write $U = \coprod U_ i$ with $U_ i$ the inverse image of $F_ i$, see Lemma 64.8.2. We claim that $U \to F$ is surjective and étale. Surjectivity follows as $\coprod F_ i \to F$ is surjective (see first paragraph of the proof) by applying Lemma 64.5.4. Consider the fibre product $U \times _ F T$ where $T \to F$ is as above. We have to show that $U \times _ F T \to T$ is étale. Since $U \times _ F T = \coprod U_ i \times _ F T$ it suffices to show each $U_ i \times _ F T \to T$ is étale. Since $U_ i \times _ F T = U_ i \times _{F_ i} V_ i$ this follows from the fact that $U_ i \to F_ i$ is étale and $V_ i \to T$ is an open immersion (and Morphisms, Lemmas 29.36.9 and 29.36.3). $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (10)

Comment #599 by yogesh on

Comment #602 by Johan on

Comment #611 by yogesh on

Comment #616 by Johan on

Comment #3519 by Laurent Moret-Bailly on

Comment #3659 by Johan on

Comment #4355 by oregontrailmixtape on

Comment #4500 by Johan on

Comment #5994 by Hanlin on

Comment #6161 by Johan on