Processing math: 100%

The Stacks project

Lemma 29.48.7. Let f : Y \to X be a finite morphism of schemes. Let T \subset Y be a closed nowhere dense subset of Y. Then f(T) \subset X is a closed nowhere dense subset of X.

Proof. By Lemma 29.44.11 we know that f(T) \subset X is closed. Let X = \bigcup X_ i be an affine covering. Since T is nowhere dense in Y, we see that also T \cap f^{-1}(X_ i) is nowhere dense in f^{-1}(X_ i). Hence if we can prove the theorem in the affine case, then we see that f(T) \cap X_ i is nowhere dense. This then implies that T is nowhere dense in X by Topology, Lemma 5.21.4.

Assume X is affine. Choose a diagram

\xymatrix{ Z' \ar[rd] & Y' \ar[l]^ i \ar[d]^{f'} \ar[r]_ a & Y \ar[d]^ f \\ & X' \ar[r]^ b & X }

as in Lemma 29.48.6. The morphisms a, b are open since they are finite locally free (Lemmas 29.48.2 and 29.25.10). Hence T' = a^{-1}(T) is nowhere dense, see Topology, Lemma 5.21.6. The morphism b is surjective and open. Hence, if we can prove f'(T') = b^{-1}(f(T)) is nowhere dense, then f(T) is nowhere dense, see Topology, Lemma 5.21.6. As i is a closed immersion, by Topology, Lemma 5.21.5 we see that i(T') \subset Z' is closed and nowhere dense. Thus we have reduced the problem to the case discussed in the following paragraph.

Assume that Y = \bigcup _{i = 1, \ldots , n} Y_ i is a finite union of closed subsets, each mapping isomorphically to X. Consider T_ i = Y_ i \cap T. If each of the T_ i is nowhere dense in Y_ i, then each f(T_ i) is nowhere dense in X as Y_ i \to X is an isomorphism. Hence f(T) = f(T_ i) is a finite union of nowhere dense closed subsets of X and we win, see Topology, Lemma 5.21.2. Suppose not, say T_1 contains a nonempty open V \subset Y_1. We are going to show this leads to a contradiction. Consider Y_2 \cap V \subset V. This is either a proper closed subset, or equal to V. In the first case we replace V by V \setminus V \cap Y_2, so V \subset T_1 is open in Y_1 and does not meet Y_2. In the second case we have V \subset Y_1 \cap Y_2 is open in both Y_1 and Y_2. Repeat sequentially with i = 3, \ldots , n. The result is a disjoint union decomposition

\{ 1, \ldots , n\} = I_1 \amalg I_2, \quad 1 \in I_1

and an open V of Y_1 contained in T_1 such that V \subset Y_ i for i \in I_1 and V \cap Y_ i = \emptyset for i \in I_2. Set U = f(V). This is an open of X since f|_{Y_1} : Y_1 \to X is an isomorphism. Then

f^{-1}(U) = V\ \amalg \ \bigcup \nolimits _{i \in I_2} (Y_ i \cap f^{-1}(U))

As \bigcup _{i \in I_2} Y_ i is closed, this implies that V \subset f^{-1}(U) is open, hence V \subset Y is open. This contradicts the assumption that T is nowhere dense in Y, as desired. \square


Comments (0)


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.