Lemma 37.45.2. Let f : Y \to X be a quasi-finite morphism. There exists a dense open U \subset X such that f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U is finite.
Proof. If U_ i \subset X, i \in I is a collection of opens such that the restrictions f|_{f^{-1}(U_ i)} : f^{-1}(U_ i) \to U_ i are finite, then with U = \bigcup U_ i the restriction f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U is finite, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.44.3. Thus the problem is local on X and we may assume that X is affine.
Assume X is affine. Write Y = \bigcup _{j = 1, \ldots , m} V_ j with V_ j affine. This is possible since f is quasi-finite and hence in particular quasi-compact. Each V_ j \to X is quasi-finite and separated. Let \eta \in X be a generic point of an irreducible component of X. We see from Morphisms, Lemmas 29.20.10 and 29.51.1 that there exists an open neighbourhood \eta \in U_\eta such that f^{-1}(U_\eta ) \cap V_ j \to U_\eta is finite. We may choose U_\eta such that it works for each j = 1, \ldots , m. Note that the collection of generic points of X is dense in X. Thus we see there exists a dense open W = \bigcup _\eta U_\eta such that each f^{-1}(W) \cap V_ j \to W is finite. It suffices to show that there exists a dense open U \subset W such that f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U is finite. Thus we may replace X by an affine open subscheme of W and assume that each V_ j \to X is finite.
Assume X is affine, Y = \bigcup _{j = 1, \ldots , m} V_ j with V_ j affine, and the restrictions f|_{V_ j} : V_ j \to X are finite. Set
This is a nowhere dense closed subset of V_ j because it is the boundary of the open subset V_ i \cap V_ j in V_ j. By Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.7 the image f(\Delta _{ij}) is a nowhere dense closed subset of X. By Topology, Lemma 5.21.2 the union T = \bigcup f(\Delta _{ij}) is a nowhere dense closed subset of X. Thus U = X \setminus T is a dense open subset of X. We claim that f|_{f^{-1}(U)} : f^{-1}(U) \to U is finite. To see this let U' \subset U be an affine open. Set Y' = f^{-1}(U') = U' \times _ X Y, V_ j' = Y' \cap V_ j = U' \times _ X V_ j. Consider the restriction
of f. This morphism now has the property that Y' = \bigcup _{j = 1, \ldots , m} V'_ j is an affine open covering, each V'_ j \to U' is finite, and V_ i' \cap V_ j' is (open and) closed both in V'_ i and V'_ j. Hence V_ i' \cap V_ j' is affine, and the map
is surjective. This implies that Y' is separated, see Schemes, Lemma 26.21.7. Finally, consider the commutative diagram
The south-east arrow is finite, hence proper, the horizontal arrow is surjective, and the south-west arrow is separated. Hence by Morphisms, Lemma 29.41.9 we conclude that Y' \to U' is proper. Since it is also quasi-finite, we see that it is finite by Lemma 37.44.1, and we win. \square
Comments (0)