## 68.10 Schematic locus

In this section we prove that a decent algebraic space has a dense open subspace which is a scheme. We first prove this for reasonable algebraic spaces.

Proposition 68.10.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. If $X$ is reasonable, then there exists a dense open subspace of $X$ which is a scheme.

Proof. By Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.13.1 the question is local on $X$. Hence we may assume there exists an affine scheme $U$ and a surjective étale morphism $U \to X$ (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.6.1). Let $n$ be an integer bounding the degrees of the fibres of $U \to X$ which exists as $X$ is reasonable, see Definition 68.6.1. We will argue by induction on $n$ that whenever

1. $U \to X$ is a surjective étale morphism whose fibres have degree $\leq n$, and

2. $U$ is isomorphic to a locally closed subscheme of an affine scheme

then the schematic locus is dense in $X$.

Let $X_ n \subset X$ be the open subspace which is the complement of the closed subspace $Z_{n - 1} \subset X$ constructed in Lemma 68.8.1 using the morphism $U \to X$. Let $U_ n \subset U$ be the inverse image of $X_ n$. Then $U_ n \to X_ n$ is finite locally free of degree $n$. Hence $X_ n$ is a scheme by Properties of Spaces, Proposition 66.14.1 (and the fact that any finite set of points of $U_ n$ is contained in an affine open of $U_ n$, see Properties, Lemma 28.29.5).

Let $X' \subset X$ be the open subspace such that $|X'|$ is the interior of $|Z_{n - 1}|$ in $|X|$ (see Topology, Definition 5.21.1). Let $U' \subset U$ be the inverse image. Then $U' \to X'$ is surjective étale and has degrees of fibres bounded by $n - 1$. By induction we see that the schematic locus of $X'$ is an open dense $X'' \subset X'$. By elementary topology we see that $X'' \cup X_ n \subset X$ is open and dense and we win. $\square$

Theorem 68.10.2 (David Rydh). Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. If $X$ is decent, then there exists a dense open subspace of $X$ which is a scheme.

Proof. Assume $X$ is a decent algebraic space for which the theorem is false. By Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.13.1 there exists a largest open subspace $X' \subset X$ which is a scheme. Since $X'$ is not dense in $X$, there exists an open subspace $X'' \subset X$ such that $|X''| \cap |X'| = \emptyset$. Replacing $X$ by $X''$ we get a nonempty decent algebraic space $X$ which does not contain any open subspace which is a scheme.

Choose a nonempty affine scheme $U$ and an étale morphism $U \to X$. We may and do replace $X$ by the open subscheme corresponding to the image of $|U| \to |X|$. Consider the sequence of open subspaces

$X = X_0 \supset X_1 \supset X_2 \ldots$

constructed in Lemma 68.8.2 for the morphism $U \to X$. Note that $X_0 = X_1$ as $U \to X$ is surjective. Let $U = U_0 = U_1 \supset U_2 \ldots$ be the induced sequence of open subschemes of $U$.

Choose a nonempty open affine $V_1 \subset U_1$ (for example $V_1 = U_1$). By induction we will construct a sequence of nonempty affine opens $V_1 \supset V_2 \supset \ldots$ with $V_ n \subset U_ n$. Namely, having constructed $V_1, \ldots , V_{n - 1}$ we can always choose $V_ n$ unless $V_{n - 1} \cap U_ n = \emptyset$. But if $V_{n - 1} \cap U_ n = \emptyset$, then the open subspace $X' \subset X$ with $|X'| = \mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(|V_{n - 1}| \to |X|)$ is contained in $|X| \setminus |X_ n|$. Hence $V_{n - 1} \to X'$ is an étale morphism whose fibres have degree bounded by $n - 1$. In other words, $X'$ is reasonable (by definition), hence $X'$ contains a nonempty open subscheme by Proposition 68.10.1. This is a contradiction which shows that we can pick $V_ n$.

By Limits, Lemma 32.4.3 the limit $V_\infty = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits V_ n$ is a nonempty scheme. Pick a morphism $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to V_\infty$. The composition $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k) \to V_\infty \to U \to X$ has image contained in all $X_ d$ by construction. In other words, the fibred $U \times _ X \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k)$ has infinite degree which contradicts the definition of a decent space. This contradiction finishes the proof of the theorem. $\square$

Lemma 68.10.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X \to Y$ be a surjective finite locally free morphism of algebraic spaces over $S$. For $y \in |Y|$ the following are equivalent

1. $y$ is in the schematic locus of $Y$, and

2. there exists an affine open $U \subset X$ containing the preimage of $y$.

Proof. If $y \in Y$ is in the schematic locus, then it has an affine open neighbourhood $V \subset Y$ and the inverse image $U$ of $V$ in $X$ is an open finite over $V$, hence affine. Thus (1) implies (2).

Conversely, assume that $U \subset X$ as in (2) is given. Set $R = X \times _ Y X$ and denote the projections $s, t : R \to X$. Consider $Z = R \setminus s^{-1}(U) \cap t^{-1}(U)$. This is a closed subset of $R$. The image $t(Z)$ is a closed subset of $X$ which can loosely be described as the set of points of $X$ which are $R$-equivalent to a point of $X \setminus U$. Hence $U' = X \setminus t(Z)$ is an $R$-invariant, open subspace of $X$ contained in $U$ which contains the fibre of $X \to Y$ over $y$. Since $X \to Y$ is open (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.6) the image of $U'$ is an open subspace $V' \subset Y$. Since $U'$ is $R$-invariant and $R = X \times _ Y X$, we see that $U'$ is the inverse image of $V'$ (use Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.4.3). After replacing $Y$ by $V'$ and $X$ by $U'$ we see that we may assume $X$ is a scheme isomorphic to an open subscheme of an affine scheme.

Assume $X$ is a scheme isomorphic to an open subscheme of an affine scheme. In this case the fppf quotient sheaf $X/R$ is a scheme, see Properties of Spaces, Proposition 66.14.1. Since $Y$ is a sheaf in the fppf topology, obtain a canonical map $X/R \to Y$ factoring $X \to Y$. Since $X \to Y$ is surjective finite locally free, it is surjective as a map of sheaves (Spaces, Lemma 65.5.9). We conclude that $X/R \to Y$ is surjective as a map of sheaves. On the other hand, since $R = X \times _ Y X$ as sheaves we conclude that $X/R \to Y$ is injective as a map of sheaves. Hence $X/R \to Y$ is an isomorphism and we see that $Y$ is representable. $\square$

At this point we have several different ways for proving the following lemma.

Lemma 68.10.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X$ be an algebraic space over $S$. If there exists a finite, étale, surjective morphism $U \to X$ where $U$ is a scheme, then there exists a dense open subspace of $X$ which is a scheme.

First proof. The morphism $U \to X$ is finite locally free. Hence there is a decomposition of $X$ into open and closed subspaces $X_ d \subset X$ such that $U \times _ X X_ d \to X_ d$ is finite locally free of degree $d$. Thus we may assume $U \to X$ is finite locally free of degree $d$. In this case, let $U_ i \subset U$, $i \in I$ be the set of affine opens. For each $i$ the morphism $U_ i \to X$ is étale and has universally bounded fibres (namely, bounded by $d$). In other words, $X$ is reasonable and the result follows from Proposition 68.10.1. $\square$

Second proof. The question is local on $X$ (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.13.1), hence may assume $X$ is quasi-compact. Then $U$ is quasi-compact. Then there exists a dense open subscheme $W \subset U$ which is separated (Properties, Lemma 28.29.3). Set $Z = U \setminus W$. Let $R = U \times _ X U$ and $s, t : R \to U$ the projections. Then $t^{-1}(Z)$ is nowhere dense in $R$ (Topology, Lemma 5.21.6) and hence $\Delta = s(t^{-1}(Z))$ is an $R$-invariant closed nowhere dense subset of $U$ (Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.7). Let $u \in U \setminus \Delta$ be a generic point of an irreducible component. Since these points are dense in $U \setminus \Delta$ and since $\Delta$ is nowhere dense, it suffices to show that the image $x \in X$ of $u$ is in the schematic locus of $X$. Observe that $t(s^{-1}(\{ u\} )) \subset W$ is a finite set of generic points of irreducible components of $W$ (compare with Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.11.1). By Properties, Lemma 28.29.1 we can find an affine open $V \subset W$ such that $t(s^{-1}(\{ u\} )) \subset V$. Since $t(s^{-1}(\{ u\} ))$ is the fibre of $|U| \to |X|$ over $x$, we conclude by Lemma 68.10.3. $\square$

Third proof. (This proof is essentially the same as the second proof, but uses fewer references.) Assume $X$ is an algebraic space, $U$ a scheme, and $U \to X$ is a finite étale surjective morphism. Write $R = U \times _ X U$ and denote $s, t : R \to U$ the projections as usual. Note that $s, t$ are surjective, finite and étale. Claim: The union of the $R$-invariant affine opens of $U$ is topologically dense in $U$.

Proof of the claim. Let $W \subset U$ be an affine open. Set $W' = t(s^{-1}(W)) \subset U$. Since $s^{-1}(W)$ is affine (hence quasi-compact) we see that $W' \subset U$ is a quasi-compact open. By Properties, Lemma 28.29.3 there exists a dense open $W'' \subset W'$ which is a separated scheme. Set $\Delta ' = W' \setminus W''$. This is a nowhere dense closed subset of $W''$. Since $t|_{s^{-1}(W)} : s^{-1}(W) \to W'$ is open (because it is étale) we see that the inverse image $(t|_{s^{-1}(W)})^{-1}(\Delta ') \subset s^{-1}(W)$ is a nowhere dense closed subset (see Topology, Lemma 5.21.6). Hence, by Morphisms, Lemma 29.48.7 we see that

$\Delta = s\left((t|_{s^{-1}(W)})^{-1}(\Delta ')\right)$

is a nowhere dense closed subset of $W$. Pick any point $\eta \in W$, $\eta \not\in \Delta$ which is a generic point of an irreducible component of $W$ (and hence of $U$). By our choices above the finite set $t(s^{-1}(\{ \eta \} )) = \{ \eta _1, \ldots , \eta _ n\}$ is contained in the separated scheme $W''$. Note that the fibres of $s$ is are finite discrete spaces, and that generalizations lift along the étale morphism $t$, see Morphisms, Lemmas 29.36.12 and 29.25.9. In this way we see that each $\eta _ i$ is a generic point of an irreducible component of $W''$. Thus, by Properties, Lemma 28.29.1 we can find an affine open $V \subset W''$ such that $\{ \eta _1, \ldots , \eta _ n\} \subset V$. By Groupoids, Lemma 39.24.1 this implies that $\eta$ is contained in an $R$-invariant affine open subscheme of $U$. The claim follows as $W$ was chosen as an arbitrary affine open of $U$ and because the set of generic points of irreducible components of $W \setminus \Delta$ is dense in $W$.

Using the claim we can finish the proof. Namely, if $W \subset U$ is an $R$-invariant affine open, then the restriction $R_ W$ of $R$ to $W$ equals $R_ W = s^{-1}(W) = t^{-1}(W)$ (see Groupoids, Definition 39.19.1 and discussion following it). In particular the maps $R_ W \to W$ are finite étale also. It follows in particular that $R_ W$ is affine. Thus we see that $W/R_ W$ is a scheme, by Groupoids, Proposition 39.23.9. On the other hand, $W/R_ W$ is an open subspace of $X$ by Spaces, Lemma 65.10.2. Hence having a dense collection of points contained in $R$-invariant affine open of $U$ certainly implies that the schematic locus of $X$ (see Properties of Spaces, Lemma 66.13.1) is open dense in $X$. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 06NN. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.