Definition 21.41.1. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let \mathcal{A}_\bullet be a simplicial sheaf of rings on \mathcal{C}. A simplicial \mathcal{A}_\bullet -module \mathcal{F}_\bullet (sometimes called a simplicial sheaf of \mathcal{A}_\bullet -modules) is a sheaf of modules over the sheaf of rings on \Delta \times \mathcal{C} associated to \mathcal{A}_\bullet .
21.41 Simplicial modules
Let A_\bullet be a simplicial ring. Recall that we may think of A_\bullet as a sheaf on \Delta (endowed with the chaotic topology), see Simplicial, Section 14.4. Then a simplicial module M_\bullet over A_\bullet is just a sheaf of A_\bullet -modules on \Delta . In other words, for every n \geq 0 we have an A_ n-module M_ n and for every map \varphi : [n] \to [m] we have a corresponding map
which is A_\bullet (\varphi )-linear such that these maps compose in the usual manner.
Let \mathcal{C} be a site. A simplicial sheaf of rings \mathcal{A}_\bullet on \mathcal{C} is a simplicial object in the category of sheaves of rings on \mathcal{C}. In this case the assignment U \mapsto \mathcal{A}_\bullet (U) is a sheaf of simplicial rings and in fact the two notions are equivalent. A similar discussion holds for simplicial abelian sheaves, simplicial sheaves of Lie algebras, and so on.
However, as in the case of simplicial rings above, there is another way to think about simplicial sheaves. Namely, consider the projection
This defines a fibred category with strongly cartesian morphisms exactly the morphisms of the form ([n], U) \to ([n], V). We endow the category \Delta \times \mathcal{C} with the topology inherited from \mathcal{C} (see Stacks, Section 8.10). The simple description of the coverings in \Delta \times \mathcal{C} (Stacks, Lemma 8.10.1) immediately implies that a simplicial sheaf of rings on \mathcal{C} is the same thing as a sheaf of rings on \Delta \times \mathcal{C}.
By analogy with the case of simplicial modules over a simplicial ring, we define simplicial modules over simplicial sheaves of rings as follows.
We obtain a category \textit{Mod}(\mathcal{A}_\bullet ) of simplicial modules and a corresponding derived category D(\mathcal{A}_\bullet ). Given a map \mathcal{A}_\bullet \to \mathcal{B}_\bullet of simplicial sheaves of rings we obtain a functor
Moreover, the material of the preceding sections determines a functor
Given a simplicial module \mathcal{F}_\bullet the object L\pi _!(\mathcal{F}_\bullet ) is represented by the associated chain complex s(\mathcal{F}_\bullet ) (Simplicial, Section 14.23). This follows from Lemmas 21.40.2 and 21.39.7.
Lemma 21.41.2. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let \mathcal{A}_\bullet \to \mathcal{B}_\bullet be a homomorphism of simplicial sheaves of rings on \mathcal{C}. If L\pi _!\mathcal{A}_\bullet \to L\pi _!\mathcal{B}_\bullet is an isomorphism in D(\mathcal{C}), then we have
for all K in D(\mathcal{A}_\bullet ).
Proof. Let ([n], U) be an object of \Delta \times \mathcal{C}. Since L\pi _! commutes with colimits, it suffices to prove this for bounded above complexes of \mathcal{O}-modules (compare with argument of Derived Categories, Proposition 13.29.2 or just stick to bounded above complexes). Every such complex is quasi-isomorphic to a bounded above complex whose terms are flat modules, see Modules on Sites, Lemma 18.28.8. Thus it suffices to prove the lemma for a flat \mathcal{A}_\bullet -module \mathcal{F}. In this case the derived tensor product is the usual tensor product and is a sheaf also. Hence by Lemma 21.40.2 we can compute the cohomology sheaves of both sides of the equation by the procedure of Lemma 21.40.1. Thus it suffices to prove the result for the restriction of \mathcal{F} to the fibre categories (i.e., to \Delta \times U). In this case the result follows from Lemma 21.39.12. \square
Remark 21.41.3. Let \mathcal{C} be a site. Let \epsilon : \mathcal{A}_\bullet \to \mathcal{O} be an augmentation (Simplicial, Definition 14.20.1) in the category of sheaves of rings. Assume \epsilon induces a quasi-isomorphism s(\mathcal{A}_\bullet ) \to \mathcal{O}. In this case we obtain an exact functor of triangulated categories
Namely, for any object K of D(\mathcal{A}_\bullet ) we have L\pi _!(K) = L\pi _!(K \otimes _{\mathcal{A}_\bullet }^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}) by Lemma 21.41.2. Thus we can define the displayed functor as the composition of - \otimes ^\mathbf {L}_{\mathcal{A}_\bullet } \mathcal{O} with the functor L\pi _! : D(\Delta \times \mathcal{C}, \pi ^{-1}\mathcal{O}) \to D(\mathcal{O}) of Remark 21.38.6. In other words, we obtain a \mathcal{O}-module structure on L\pi _!(K) coming from the (canonical, functorial) identification of L\pi _!(K) with L\pi _!(K \otimes _{\mathcal{A}_\bullet }^\mathbf {L} \mathcal{O}) of the lemma.
Comments (0)