Definition 15.83.1. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. An object $K$ of $D(A)$ is *$R$-perfect* or *perfect relative to $R$* if $K$ is pseudo-coherent (Definition 15.64.1) and has finite tor dimension over $R$ (Definition 15.66.1).

## 15.83 Relatively perfect modules

This section is the analogue of Section 15.81 for perfect objects of the derived category. we only define this notion in a limited generality as we are not sure what the correct definition is in general. See Derived Categories of Schemes, Remark 36.35.14 for a discussion.

By Lemma 15.82.8 it would have been the same thing to ask $K$ to be pseudo-coherent relative to $R$. Here are some obligatory lemmas.

Lemma 15.83.2. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. The $R$-perfect objects of $D(A)$ form a saturated^{1} triangulated strictly full subcategory.

**Proof.**
This follows from Lemmas 15.64.2, 15.64.8, 15.66.5, and 15.66.7.
$\square$

Lemma 15.83.3. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. A perfect object of $D(A)$ is $R$-perfect. If $K, M \in D(A)$ then $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} M$ is $R$-perfect if $K$ is perfect and $M$ is $R$-perfect.

**Proof.**
The first statement follows from the second by taking $M = A$. The second statement follows from Lemmas 15.74.2, 15.66.10, and 15.64.16.
$\square$

Lemma 15.83.4. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. Let $K \in D(A)$. The following are equivalent

$K$ is $R$-perfect, and

$K$ is isomorphic to a finite complex of $R$-flat, finitely presented $A$-modules.

**Proof.**
To prove (2) implies (1) it suffices by Lemma 15.83.2 to show that an $R$-flat, finitely presented $A$-module $M$ defines an $R$-perfect object of $D(A)$. Since $M$ has finite tor dimension over $R$, it suffices to show that $M$ is pseudo-coherent. By Algebra, Lemma 10.168.1 there exists a finite type $\mathbf{Z}$-algebra $R_0 \subset R$ and a flat finite type ring map $R_0 \to A_0$ and a finite $A_0$-module $M_0$ flat over $R_0$ such that $A = A_0 \otimes _{R_0} R$ and $M = M_0 \otimes _{R_0} R$. By Lemma 15.64.17 we see that $M_0$ is pseudo-coherent $A_0$-module. Choose a resolution $P_0^\bullet \to M_0$ by finite free $A_0$-modules $P_0^ n$. Since $A_0$ is flat over $R_0$, this is a flat resolution. Since $M_0$ is flat over $R_0$ we find that $P^\bullet = P_0^\bullet \otimes _{R_0} R$ still resolves $M = M_0 \otimes _{R_0} R$. (You can use Lemma 15.61.2 to see this.) Hence $P^\bullet $ is a finite free resolution of $M$ over $A$ and we conclude that $M$ is pseudo-coherent.

Assume (1). We can represent $K$ by a bounded above complex $P^\bullet $ of finite free $A$-modules. Assume that $K$ viewed as an object of $D(R)$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$. By Lemma 15.66.2 we see that $\tau _{\geq a}P^\bullet $ is a complex of $R$-flat, finitely presented $A$-modules representing $K$. $\square$

Lemma 15.83.5. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. Let $R \to R'$ be a ring map and set $A' = A \otimes _ R R'$. If $K \in D(A)$ is $R$-perfect, then $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A'$ is $R'$-perfect.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 15.64.12 we see that $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A'$ is pseudo-coherent. By Lemma 15.61.2 we see that $K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A'$ is equal to $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in $D(R')$. Then we can apply Lemma 15.66.13 to see that $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} R'$ in $D(R')$ has finite tor dimension.
$\square$

Lemma 15.83.6. Let $R \to A$ be a flat ring map. Let $K, L \in D(A)$ with $K$ pseudo-coherent and $L$ finite tor dimension over $R$. We may choose

a bounded above complex $P^\bullet $ of finite free $A$-modules representing $K$, and

a bounded complex of $R$-flat $A$-modules $F^\bullet $ representing $L$.

Given these choices we have

$E^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^\bullet (P^\bullet , F^\bullet )$ is a bounded below complex of $R$-flat $A$-modules representing $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, L)$,

for any ring map $R \to R'$ with $A' = A \otimes _ R R'$ the complex $E^\bullet \otimes _ R R'$ represents $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{A'}(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A', L \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A')$.

If in addition $R \to A$ is of finite presentation and $L$ is $R$-perfect, then we may choose $F^ p$ to be finitely presented $A$-modules and consequently $E^ n$ will be finitely presented $A$-modules as well.

**Proof.**
The existence of $P^\bullet $ is the definition of a pseudo-coherent complex. We first represent $L$ by a bounded above complex $F^\bullet $ of free $A$-modules (this is possible because bounded tor dimension in particular implies bounded). Next, say $L$ viewed as an object of $D(R)$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$. Then, after replacing $F^\bullet $ by $\tau _{\geq a}F^\bullet $, we get a complex as in (2). This follows from Lemma 15.66.2.

Proof of (a). Since $F^\bullet $ is bounded an since $P^\bullet $ is bounded above, we see that $E^ n = 0$ for $n \ll 0$ and that $E^ n$ is a finite (!) direct sum

and since $P^{-q}$ is finite free, this is indeed an $R$-flat $A$-module. The fact that $E^\bullet $ represents $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(K, L)$ follows from Lemma 15.73.2.

Proof of (b). Let $R \to R'$ be a ring map and $A' = A \otimes _ R R'$. By Lemma 15.61.2 the object $L \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A'$ is represented by $F^\bullet \otimes _ R R'$ viewed as a complex of $A'$-modules (by flatness of $F^ p$ over $R$). Similarly for $P^\bullet \otimes _ R R'$. As above $R\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{A'}(K \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A', L \otimes _ A^\mathbf {L} A')$ is represented by

The equality holds by looking at the terms of the complex individually and using that $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{A'}(P^{-q} \otimes _ R R', F^ p \otimes _ R R') = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _ A(P^{-q}, F^ p) \otimes _ R R'$. $\square$

Lemma 15.83.7. Let $R = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} R_ i$ be a filtered colimit of rings. Let $0 \in I$ and $R_0 \to A_0$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. For $i \geq 0$ set $A_ i = R_ i \otimes _{R_0} A_0$ and set $A = R \otimes _{R_0} A_0$.

Given an $R$-perfect $K$ in $D(A)$ there exists an $i \in I$ and an $R_ i$-perfect $K_ i$ in $D(A_ i)$ such that $K \cong K_ i \otimes _{A_ i}^\mathbf {L} A$ in $D(A)$.

Given $K_0, L_0 \in D(A_0)$ with $K_0$ pseudo-coherent and $L_0$ finite tor dimension over $R_0$, then we have

\[ \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A)}(K_0 \otimes _{A_0}^\mathbf {L} A, L_0 \otimes _{A_0}^\mathbf {L} A) = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \geq 0} \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(A_ i)}(K_0 \otimes _{A_0}^\mathbf {L} A_ i, L_0 \otimes _{A_0}^\mathbf {L} A_ i) \]

In particular, the triangulated category of $R$-perfect complexes over $A$ is the colimit of the triangulated categories of $R_ i$-perfect complexes over $A_ i$.

**Proof.**
By Algebra, Lemma 10.127.6 the category of finitely presented $A$-modules is the colimit of the categories of finitely presented $A_ i$-modules. Given this, Algebra, Lemma 10.168.1 tells us that category of $R$-flat, finitely presented $A$-modules is the colimit of the categories of $R_ i$-flat, finitely presented $A_ i$-modules. Thus the characterization in Lemma 15.83.4 proves that (1) is true.

To prove (2) we choose $P_0^\bullet $ representing $K_0$ and $F_0^\bullet $ representing $L_0$ as in Lemma 15.83.6. Then $E_0^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits ^\bullet (P_0^\bullet , F_0^\bullet )$ satisfies

and

by the lemma. Thus the result because tensor product commutes with colimits and filtered colimits are exact (Algebra, Lemma 10.8.8). $\square$

Lemma 15.83.8. Let $R' \to A'$ be a flat ring map of finite presentation. Let $R' \to R$ be a surjective ring map whose kernel is a nilpotent ideal. Set $A = A' \otimes _{R'} R$. Let $K' \in D(A')$ and set $K = K' \otimes _{A'}^\mathbf {L} A$ in $D(A)$. If $K$ is $R$-perfect, then $K'$ is $R'$-perfect.

**Proof.**
We can represent $K$ by a bounded above complex of finite free $A$-modules $E^\bullet $, see Lemma 15.64.5. By Lemma 15.75.3 we conclude that $K'$ is pseudo-coherent because it can be represented by a bounded above complex $P^\bullet $ of finite free $A'$-modules with $P^\bullet \otimes _{A'} A = E^\bullet $. Observe that this also means $P^\bullet \otimes _{R'} R = E^\bullet $ (since $A = A' \otimes _{R'} R$).

Let $I = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(R' \to R)$. Then $I^ n = 0$ for some $n$. Choose $[a, b]$ such that $K$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$ as a complex of $R$-modules. We will show $K'$ has tor amplitude in $[a, b]$. To do this, let $M'$ be an $R'$-module. If $IM' = 0$, then

(because $A'$ is flat over $R'$ and $A$ is flat over $R$) which has nonzero cohomology only for degrees in $[a, b]$ by choice of $a, b$. If $I^{t + 1}M' = 0$, then we consider the short exact sequence

with $M = M'/IM'$. By induction on $t$ we have that both $K' \otimes _{R'}^\mathbf {L} IM'$ and $K' \otimes _{R'}^\mathbf {L} M'/IM'$ have nonzero cohomology only for degrees in $[a, b]$. Then the distinguished triangle

proves the same is true for $K' \otimes _{R'}^\mathbf {L} M'$. This proves the desired bound for all $M'$ and hence the desired bound on the tor amplitude of $K'$. $\square$

Lemma 15.83.9. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]/I$ be flat and of finite presentation over $R$. Let $\mathfrak q \subset A$ be a prime ideal lying over $\mathfrak p \subset R$. Let $K \in D(A)$ be pseudo-coherent. Let $a, b \in \mathbf{Z}$. If $H^ i(K_\mathfrak q \otimes _{R_\mathfrak p}^\mathbf {L} \kappa (\mathfrak p))$ is nonzero only for $i \in [a, b]$, then $K_\mathfrak q$ has tor amplitude in $[a - d, b]$ over $R$.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 15.82.8 $K$ is pseudo-coherent as a complex of $R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]$-modules. Therefore we may assume $A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]$. Applying Lemma 15.77.6 to $R_\mathfrak p \to A_\mathfrak q$ and the complex $K_\mathfrak q$ using our assumption, we find that $K_\mathfrak q$ is perfect in $D(A_\mathfrak q)$ with tor amplitude in $[a - d, b]$. Since $R_\mathfrak p \to A_\mathfrak q$ is flat, we conclude by Lemma 15.66.11.
$\square$

Lemma 15.83.10. Let $R \to A$ be a ring map which is flat and of finite presentation. Let $K \in D(A)$ be pseudo-coherent. The following are equivalent

$K$ is $R$-perfect, and

$K$ is bounded below and for every prime ideal $\mathfrak p \subset R$ the object $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ is bounded below.

**Proof.**
Observe that (1) implies (2) as an $R$-perfect complex has bounded tor dimension as a complex of $R$-modules by definition. Let us prove the other implication.

Write $A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]/I$. Denote $L$ in $D(R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d])$ the restriction of $K$. By Lemma 15.82.8 we see that $L$ is pseudo-coherent. Since $L$ and $K$ have the same image in $D(R)$ we see that $L$ is $R$-perfect if and only if $K$ is $R$-perfect. Also $L \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ and $K \otimes _ R^\mathbf {L} \kappa (\mathfrak p)$ are the same objects of $D(\kappa (\mathfrak p))$. This reduces us to the case $A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]$.

Say $A = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ d]$ and $K$ satisfies (2). Let $\mathfrak q \subset A$ be a prime lying over a prime $\mathfrak p \subset R$. By Lemma 15.77.6 applied to $R_\mathfrak p \to A_\mathfrak q$ and the complex $K_\mathfrak q$ using our assumption, we find that $K_\mathfrak q$ is perfect in $D(A_\mathfrak q)$. Since $K$ is bounded below, we see that $K$ is perfect in $D(A)$ by Lemma 15.77.3. This implies that $K$ is $R$-perfect by Lemma 15.83.3 and the proof is complete. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)