Lemma 45.11.2. Assume given (D0), (D1), (D2), and (D3) satisfying (A), (B), and (C). Let X be a smooth projective scheme over k. Set k' = \Gamma (X, \mathcal{O}_ X). The following are equivalent
there exist finitely many closed points x_1, \ldots , x_ r \in X whose residue fields are separable over k such that H^0(X) \to H^0(x_1) \oplus \ldots \oplus H^0(x_ r) is injective,
the map H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')) \to H^0(X) is an isomorphism.
If this is true, then H^0(X) is a finite separable algebra over F. If X is equidimensional of dimension d, then (1) and (2) are also equivalent to
the classes of closed points generate H^{2d}(X)(d) as a module over H^0(X).
Proof.
We observe that the statement makes sense because k' is a finite separable algebra over k (Varieties, Lemma 33.9.3) and hence \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k') is smooth and projective over k. The compatibility of H^* with direct sums (Lemmas 45.9.9 and 45.10.1) shows that it suffices to prove the lemma when X is connected. Hence we may assume X is irreducible and we have to show the equivalence of (1), (2), and (3). Set d = \dim (X). This implies that k' is a field finite separable over k and that X is geometrically irreducible over k', see Varieties, Lemmas 33.9.3 and 33.9.4.
By Lemma 45.8.1 we see that the closed points in (3) may be assumed to have separable residue fields over k. By axioms (A)(a) and (A)(b) we see that conditions (1) and (3) are equivalent.
If (2) holds, then pick any closed point x \in X whose residue field is finite separable over k'. Then H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')) = H^0(X) \to H^0(x) is injective for example by Lemma 45.10.8.
Assume the equivalent conditions (1) and (3) hold. Choose x_1, \ldots , x_ r \in X as in (1). Choose a finite separable extension k''/k'. By Lemma 45.10.9 we have
H^0(X) \otimes _{H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k'))} H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k'')) = H^0(X \times _{\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')} \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k''))
Thus in order to show that H^0(\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(k')) \to H^0(X) is an isomorphism we may replace k' by k''. Thus we may assume x_1, \ldots , x_ r are k'-rational points (this replaces each x_ i with multiple points, so r is increased in this step). By Lemma 45.10.7 \gamma (x_1) = \gamma (x_2) = \ldots = \gamma (x_ r). By axiom (A)(b) all the maps H^0(X) \to H^0(x_ i) are the same. This means (2) holds.
Finally, Lemma 45.10.2 implies H^0(X) is a separable F-algebra if (1) holds.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #7511 by Hao Peng on
Comment #7647 by Stacks Project on