The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

54.70 Constructible sheaves

Let $X$ be a scheme. A constructible locally closed subscheme of $X$ is a locally closed subscheme $T \subset X$ such that the underlying topological space of $T$ is a constructible subset of $X$. If $T, T' \subset X$ are locally closed subschemes with the same underlying topological space, then $T_{\acute{e}tale}\cong T'_{\acute{e}tale}$ by the topological invariance of the étale site (Theorem 54.45.2). Thus in the following definition we may assume our locally closed subschemes are reduced.

Definition 54.70.1. Let $X$ be a scheme.

  1. A sheaf of sets on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ is constructible if for every affine open $U \subset X$ there exists a finite decomposition of $U$ into constructible locally closed subschemes $U = \coprod _ i U_ i$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}$ is finite locally constant for all $i$.

  2. A sheaf of abelian groups on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ is constructible if for every affine open $U \subset X$ there exists a finite decomposition of $U$ into constructible locally closed subschemes $U = \coprod _ i U_ i$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}$ is finite locally constant for all $i$.

  3. Let $\Lambda $ be a Noetherian ring. A sheaf of $\Lambda $-modules on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ is constructible if for every affine open $U \subset X$ there exists a finite decomposition of $U$ into constructible locally closed subschemes $U = \coprod _ i U_ i$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}$ is of finite type and locally constant for all $i$.

It seems that this is the accepted definition. An alternative, which lends itself more readily to generalizations beyond the étale site of a scheme, would have been to define constructible sheaves by starting with $h_ U$, $j_{U!}\mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z}$, and $j_{U!}\underline{\Lambda }$ where $U$ runs over all quasi-compact and quasi-separated objects of $X_{\acute{e}tale}$, and then take the smallest full subcategory of $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})$, $\textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})$, and $\textit{Mod}(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \underline{\Lambda })$ containing these and closed under finite limits and colimits. It follows from Lemma 54.70.6 and Lemmas 54.72.5, 54.72.7, and 54.72.6 that this produces the same category if $X$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated. In general this does not produce the same category however.

A disjoint union decomposition $U = \coprod U_ i$ of a scheme by locally closed subschemes will be called a partition of $U$ (compare with Topology, Section 5.28).

Lemma 54.70.2. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf of sets on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. The following are equivalent

  1. $\mathcal{F}$ is constructible,

  2. there exists an open covering $X = \bigcup U_ i$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}$ is constructible, and

  3. there exists a partition $X = \bigcup X_ i$ by constructible locally closed subschemes such that $\mathcal{F}|_{X_ i}$ is finite locally constant.

A similar statement holds for abelian sheaves and sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules if $\Lambda $ is Noetherian.

Proof. It is clear that (1) implies (2).

Assume (2). For every $x \in X$ we can find an $i$ and an affine open neighbourhood $V_ x \subset U_ i$ of $x$. Hence we can find a finite affine open covering $X = \bigcup V_ j$ such that for each $j$ there exists a finite decomposition $V_ j = \coprod V_{j, k}$ by locally closed constructible subsets such that $\mathcal{F}|_{V_{j, k}}$ is finite locally constant. By Topology, Lemma 5.15.5 each $V_{j, k}$ is constructible as a subset of $X$. By Topology, Lemma 5.28.7 we can find a finite stratification $X = \coprod X_ l$ with constructible locally closed strata such that each $V_{j, k}$ is a union of $X_ l$. Thus (3) holds.

Assume (3) holds. Let $U \subset X$ be an affine open. Then $U \cap X_ i$ is a constructible locally closed subset of $U$ (for example by Properties, Lemma 27.2.1) and $U = \coprod U \cap X_ i$ is a partition of $U$ as in Definition 54.70.1. Thus (1) holds. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.3. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a sheaf of sets, abelian groups, $\Lambda $-modules (with $\Lambda $ Noetherian) on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. If there exist constructible locally closed subschemes $T_ i \subset X$ such that (a) $X = \bigcup T_ j$ and (b) $\mathcal{F}|_{T_ j}$ is constructible, then $\mathcal{F}$ is constructible.

Proof. First, we can assume the covering is finite as $X$ is quasi-compact in the spectral topology (Topology, Lemma 5.23.2 and Properties, Lemma 27.2.4). Observe that each $T_ i$ is a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme in its own right (because it is constructible in $X$; details omitted). Thus we can find a finite partition $T_ i = \coprod T_{i, j}$ into locally closed constructible parts of $T_ i$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_{T_{i, j}}$ is finite locally constant (Lemma 54.70.2). By Topology, Lemma 5.15.12 we see that $T_{i, j}$ is a constructible locally closed subscheme of $X$. Then we can apply Topology, Lemma 5.28.7 to $X = \bigcup T_{i, j}$ to find the desired partition of $X$. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.4. Let $X$ be a scheme. Checking constructibility of a sheaf of sets, abelian groups, $\Lambda $-modules (with $\Lambda $ Noetherian) can be done Zariski locally on $X$.

Proof. The statement means if $X = \bigcup U_ i$ is an open covering such that $\mathcal{F}|_{U_ i}$ is constructible, then $\mathcal{F}$ is constructible. If $U \subset X$ is affine open, then $U = \bigcup U \cap U_ i$ and $\mathcal{F}|_{U \cap U_ i}$ is constructible (it is trivial that the restriction of a constructible sheaf to an open is constructible). It follows from Lemma 54.70.2 that $\mathcal{F}|_ U$ is constructible, i.e., a suitable partition of $U$ exists. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.5. Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. If $\mathcal{F}$ is a constructible sheaf of sets, abelian groups, or $\Lambda $-modules (with $\Lambda $ Noetherian) on $Y_{\acute{e}tale}$, the same is true for $f^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$.

Proof. By Lemma 54.70.4 this reduces to the case where $X$ and $Y$ are affine. By Lemma 54.70.2 it suffices to find a finite partition of $X$ by constructible locally closed subschemes such that $f^{-1}\mathcal{F}$ is finite locally constant on each of them. To find it we just pull back the partition of $Y$ adapted to $\mathcal{F}$ and use Lemma 54.63.2. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.6. Let $X$ be a scheme.

  1. The category of constructible sheaves of sets is closed under finite limits and colimits inside $\mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (X_{\acute{e}tale})$.

  2. The category of constructible abelian sheaves is a weak Serre subcategory of $\textit{Ab}(X_{\acute{e}tale})$.

  3. Let $\Lambda $ be a Noetherian ring. The category of constructible sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ is a weak Serre subcategory of $\textit{Mod}(X_{\acute{e}tale}, \Lambda )$.

Proof. We prove (3). We will use the criterion of Homology, Lemma 12.9.3. Suppose that $\varphi : \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is a map of constructible sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules. We have to show that $\mathcal{K} = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\varphi )$ and $\mathcal{Q} = \mathop{\mathrm{Coker}}(\varphi )$ are constructible. Similarly, suppose that $0 \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{E} \to \mathcal{G} \to 0$ is a short exact sequence of sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules with $\mathcal{F}$, $\mathcal{G}$ constructible. We have to show that $\mathcal{E}$ is constructible. In both cases we can replace $X$ with the members of an affine open covering. Hence we may assume $X$ is affine. The we may further replace $X$ by the members of a finite partition of $X$ by constructible locally closed subschemes on which $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are of finite type and locally constant. Thus we may apply Lemma 54.63.6 to conclude.

The proofs of (1) and (2) are very similar and are omitted. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.7. Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $\Lambda $ be a Noetherian ring. The tensor product of two constructible sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$ is a constructible sheaf of $\Lambda $-modules.

Proof. The question immediately reduces to the case where $X$ is affine. Since any two partitions of $X$ with constructible locally closed strata have a common refinement of the same type and since pullbacks commute with tensor product we reduce to Lemma 54.63.7. $\square$

Lemma 54.70.8. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme.

  1. Let $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ be a map of constructible sheaves of sets on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. Then the set of points $x \in X$ where $\mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}} \to \mathcal{G}_{\overline{x}}$ is surjective, resp. injective, resp. is isomorphic to a given map of sets, is constructible in $X$.

  2. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a constructible abelian sheaf on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. The support of $\mathcal{F}$ is constructible.

  3. Let $\Lambda $ be a Noetherian ring. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a constructible sheaf of $\Lambda $-modules on $X_{\acute{e}tale}$. The support of $\mathcal{F}$ is constructible.

Proof. Proof of (1). Let $X = \coprod X_ i$ be a partition of $X$ by locally closed constructible subschemes such that both $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are finite locally constant over the parts (use Lemma 54.70.2 for both $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ and choose a common refinement). Then apply Lemma 54.63.5 to the restriction of the map to each part.

The proof of (2) and (3) is omitted. $\square$

The following lemma will turn out to be very useful later on. It roughly says that the category of constructible sheaves has a kind of weak “Noetherian” property.

Lemma 54.70.9. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{F}_ i$ be a filtered colimit of sheaves of sets, abelian sheaves, or sheaves of modules.

  1. If $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_ i$ are constructible sheaves of sets, then the ind-object $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is essentially constant with value $\mathcal{F}$.

  2. If $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_ i$ are constructible sheaves of abelian groups, then the ind-object $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is essentially constant with value $\mathcal{F}$.

  3. Let $\Lambda $ be a Noetherian ring. If $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{F}_ i$ are constructible sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules, then the ind-object $\mathcal{F}_ i$ is essentially constant with value $\mathcal{F}$.

Proof. Proof of (1). We will use without further mention that finite limits and colimits of constructible sheaves are constructible (Lemma 54.63.6). For each $i$ let $T_ i \subset X$ be the set of points $x \in X$ where $\mathcal{F}_{i, \overline{x}} \to \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}}$ is not surjective. Because $\mathcal{F}_ i$ and $\mathcal{F}$ are constructible $T_ i$ is a constructible subset of $X$ (Lemma 54.70.8). Since the stalks of $\mathcal{F}$ are finite and since $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{F}_ i$ we see that for all $x \in X$ we have $x \not\in T_ i$ for $i$ large enough. Since $X$ is a spectral space by Properties, Lemma 27.2.4 the constructible topology on $X$ is quasi-compact by Topology, Lemma 5.23.2. Thus $T_ i = \emptyset $ for $i$ large enough. Thus $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}$ is surjective for $i$ large enough. Assume now that $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}$ is surjective for all $i$. Choose $i \in I$. For $i' \geq i$ denote $S_{i'} \subset X$ the set of points $x$ such that the number of elements in $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\mathcal{F}_{i, \overline{x}} \to \mathcal{F}_{\overline{x}})$ is equal to the number of elements in $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\mathcal{F}_{i, \overline{x}} \to \mathcal{F}_{i', \overline{x}})$. Because $\mathcal{F}_ i$, $\mathcal{F}_{i'}$ and $\mathcal{F}$ are constructible $S_{i'}$ is a constructible subset of $X$ (details omitted; hint: use Lemma 54.70.8). Since the stalks of $\mathcal{F}_ i$ and $\mathcal{F}$ are finite and since $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} \mathcal{F}_{i'}$ we see that for all $x \in X$ we have $x \not\in S_{i'}$ for $i'$ large enough. By the same argument as above we can find a large $i'$ such that $S_{i'} = \emptyset $. Thus $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}_{i'}$ factors through $\mathcal{F}$ as desired.

Proof of (2). Observe that a constructible abelian sheaf is a constructible sheaf of sets. Thus case (2) follows from (1).

Proof of (3). We will use without further mention that the category of constructible sheaves of $\Lambda $-modules is abelian (Lemma 54.63.6). For each $i$ let $\mathcal{Q}_ i$ be the cokernel of the map $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}$. The support $T_ i$ of $\mathcal{Q}_ i$ is a constructible subset of $X$ as $\mathcal{Q}_ i$ is constructible (Lemma 54.70.8). Since the stalks of $\mathcal{F}$ are finite $\Lambda $-modules and since $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} \mathcal{F}_ i$ we see that for all $x \in X$ we have $x \not\in T_ i$ for $i$ large enough. Since $X$ is a spectral space by Properties, Lemma 27.2.4 the constructible topology on $X$ is quasi-compact by Topology, Lemma 5.23.2. Thus $T_ i = \emptyset $ for $i$ large enough. This proves the first assertion. For the second, assume now that $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}$ is surjective for all $i$. Choose $i \in I$. For $i' \geq i$ denote $\mathcal{K}_{i'}$ the image of $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F})$ in $\mathcal{F}_{i'}$. The support $S_{i'}$ of $\mathcal{K}_{i'}$ is a constructible subset of $X$ as $\mathcal{K}_{i'}$ is constructible. Since the stalks of $\mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F})$ are finite $\Lambda $-modules and since $\mathcal{F} = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits _{i' \geq i} \mathcal{F}_{i'}$ we see that for all $x \in X$ we have $x \not\in S_{i'}$ for $i'$ large enough. By the same argument as above we can find a large $i'$ such that $S_{i'} = \emptyset $. Thus $\mathcal{F}_ i \to \mathcal{F}_{i'}$ factors through $\mathcal{F}$ as desired. $\square$


Comments (2)

Comment #1720 by Keenan Kidwell on

In the last sentence of the first paragraph of this tag, the first instance of the word "are" should be "our."


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 05BE. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.