Lemma 37.31.1. Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\mathfrak p_1, \ldots , \mathfrak p_ r$ be prime ideals of $R$ with $\mathfrak p_ i \not\subset \mathfrak p_ j$ if $i \not= j$. Let $k_ i \subset \kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$ be subfields such that the extensions $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)/k_ i$ are not algebraic. Let $J \subset R$ be an ideal not contained in any of the $\mathfrak p_ i$. Then there exists an element $x \in J$ such that the image of $x$ in $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$ is transcendental over $k_ i$ for $i = 1, \ldots , r$.

## 37.31 Weak relative Noether normalization

The goal of this section is to prove Lemma 37.31.3.

**Proof.**
The ideal $J_ i = J \mathfrak p_1 \ldots \hat{\mathfrak p}_ i \ldots \mathfrak p_ r$ is not contained in $\mathfrak p_ i$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.15.1. It follows that every element $\xi $ of $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i) = \text{Frac}(B/\mathfrak p_ i)$ is of the form $\xi = a/b$ with $a, b \in J_ i$ and $b \not\in \mathfrak p_ i$. Choosing $\xi $ transcendental over $k_ i$ we see that either $a$ or $b$ maps to an element of $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$ transcendental over $k_ i$. We conclude that for every $i = 1, \ldots , r$ we can find an element $x_ i \in J_ i = J \mathfrak p_1 \ldots \hat{\mathfrak p}_ i \ldots \mathfrak p_ r$ which maps to an element of $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$ transcendental over $k_ i$. Then $x = x_1 + \ldots + x_ r$ works.
$\square$

Lemma 37.31.2. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $d \geq 0$. Let $a, b \in S$. Assume that the fibres of

given by the $R$-algebra map $R[x] \to S$ sending $x$ to $a$ have dimension $\leq d$. Then there exists an $n_0$ such that for $n \geq n_0$ the fibres of

given by the $R$-algebra map $R[x] \to S$ sending $x$ to $a^ n + b$ have dimension $\leq d$.

**Proof.**
In this paragraph we reduce to the case where $R \to S$ is of finite presentation. Namely, write $S = R[A, B, x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J$ for some ideal $J \subset R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$ where $A$ and $B$ map to $a$ and $b$ in $S$. Then $J$ is the union of its finitely generated ideals $J_\lambda \subset J$. Set $S_\lambda = R[A, B, x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J_\lambda $ and denote $a_\lambda , b_\lambda \in S_\lambda $ the images of $A$ and $B$. Then for some $\lambda $ the fibres of

have dimension $\leq d$, see Limits, Lemma 32.18.1. Fix such a $\lambda $. If we can find $n_0$ which works for $R \to S_\lambda $, $a_\lambda $, $b_\lambda $, then $n_0$ works for $R \to S$. Namely, the fibres of $f_{a_\lambda ^ n + b_\lambda } : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ) \to \mathbf{A}^1_ R$ contain the fibres of $f_{a^ n + b} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathbf{A}^1_ R$. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R \to S$ is of finite presentation. In this paragraph we reduce to the case where $R$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.127.18 we can find a directed set $\Lambda $ and a system of ring maps $R_\lambda \to S_\lambda $ over $\Lambda $ whose colimit is $R \to S$ such that $S_\mu = S_\lambda \otimes _{R_\lambda } R_\mu $ for $\mu \geq \lambda $ and such that each $R_\lambda $ and $S_\lambda $ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. Choose $\lambda _0 \in \Lambda $ and elements $a_{\lambda _0}, b_{\lambda _0} \in S_{\lambda _0}$ mapping to $a, b \in S$. For $\lambda \geq \lambda _0$ denote $a_\lambda , b_\lambda \in S_\lambda $ the image of $a_{\lambda _0}, b_{\lambda _0}$. Then for $\lambda \geq \lambda _0$ large enough the fibres of

have dimension $\leq d$, see Limits, Lemma 32.18.4. Fix such a $\lambda $. If we can find $n_0$ which works for $R_\lambda \to S_\lambda $, $a_\lambda $, $b_\lambda $, then $n_0$ works for $R \to S$. Namely, any fibre of $f_{a^ n + b} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathbf{A}^1_ R$ has the same dimension as a fibre of $f_{a_\lambda ^ n + b_\lambda } : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ) \to \mathbf{A}^1_{R_\lambda }$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.3. This reduces us the the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. In particular the dimension of $R$ is finite, and we may use induction on $\dim (R)$. Thus we may assume the result holds for all situations with $R' \to S'$, $a$, $b$ as in the lemma with $R'$ and $S'$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ but with $\dim (R') < \dim (R)$.

Since the statement is about the topology of the spectrum of $S$ we may assume $S$ is reduced. Let $S^\nu $ be the normalization of $S$. Then $S \subset S^\nu $ is a finite extension as $S$ is excellent, see Algebra, Proposition 10.162.16 and Morphisms, Lemma 29.54.11. Thus $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S^\nu ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ is surjective and finite (Algebra, Lemma 10.36.17). It follows that if the result holds for $R \to S^\nu $ and the images of $a$, $b$ in $S^\nu $, then the result holds for $R \to S$, $a$, $b$. (Small detail omitted.) This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and $S$ normal. Then $S = S_1 \times \ldots \times S_ r$ for some normal domains $S_ i$. If the result holds for each $R \to S_ i$ and the images of $a$, $b$ in $S_ i$, then the result holds for $R \to S$, $a$, $b$. (Small detail omitted.) This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and $S$ a normal domain. We may replace $R$ by the image of $R$ in $S$ (this does not increase the dimension of $R$). This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R \subset S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$ and $S$ a normal domain. Consider the morphism

The assumption tells us that $f_ a$ has fibres of dimension $\leq d$. Hence the fibres of $f : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ have dimension $\leq d + 1$ (Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.2). Consider the morphism of integral schemes

corresponding to the $R$-algebra map $R[x, y] \to S$ sending $x$ to $a$ and $y$ to $b$. There are two cases to consider

$\phi $ is dominant, and

$\phi $ is not dominant.

We claim that in both cases there exists an integer $n_0$ and a nonempty open $V \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ such that for $n \geq n_0$ the fibres of $f_{a^ n + b}$ at points $q \in \mathbf{A}^1_ V$ have dimension $\leq d$.

Proof of the claim in case (1). We have $f_{a^ n + b} = \pi _ n \circ \phi $ where

is the flat morphism corresponding to the $R$-algebra map $R[x] \to R[x, y]$ sending $x$ to $x^ n + y$. Since $\phi $ is dominant there is a dense open $U \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ such that $\phi |_ U : U \to \mathbf{A}^2_ R$ is flat (this follows for example from generic flatness, see Morphisms, Proposition 29.27.1). Then the composition

is flat as well. Hence the fibres of this morphism have at least codimension $1$ in the fibres of $f|_ U : U \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ by Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.2. In other words, the fibres of $f_{a^ n + b}|_ U$ have dimension $\leq d$. On the other hand, since $U$ is dense in $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$, we can find a nonempty open $V \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ such that $U \cap f^{-1}(p) \subset f^{-1}(p)$ is dense for all $p \in V$ (see for example Lemma 37.24.3). Thus $\dim (f^{-1}(p) \setminus U \cap f^{-1}(p)) \leq d$ and we conclude that our claim is true (as any fibres of $f_{a^ n + b} : \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathbf{A}^1_ R$ is contained in a fibre of $f$).

Case (2). In this case we can find a nonzero $g = \sum c_{ij} x^ i y^ j$ in $R[x, y]$ such that $\mathop{\mathrm{Im}}(\phi ) \subset V(g)$. In fact, we may assume $g$ is irreducible over $\text{Frac}(R)$. If $g \in R[x]$, say with leading coefficient $c$, then over $V = D(c) \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ the fibres of $f$ already have dimension $\leq d$ (because the image of $f_ a$ is contained in $V(g) \subset \mathbf{A}^1_ R$ which has finite fibres over $V$). Hence we may assume $g$ is not contained in $R[x]$. Let $s \geq 1$ be the degree of $g$ as a polynomial in $y$ and let $t$ be the degree of $\sum c_{is} x^ i$ as a polynomial in $x$. Then $c_{ts}$ is nonzero and

provided that $n$ is bigger than the degree of $g$ as a polynomial in $x$ (small detail omitted). For such $n$ the polynomial $g(x, -x^ n)$ is a nonzero polynomial in $x$ and maps to a nonzero polynomial in $\kappa (\mathfrak p)[x]$ for all $\mathfrak p \subset R$, $c_{st} \not\in \mathfrak p$. We conclude that our claim is true for $V$ equal to the principal open $D(c_{ts})$ of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$.

OK, and now we can use induction on $\dim (R)$. Namely, let $I \subset R$ be an ideal such that $V(I) = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \setminus V$. Observe that $\dim (R/I) < \dim (R)$ as $R$ is a domain. Let $n'_0$ be the integer we have by induction on $\dim (R)$ for $R/I \to S/IS$ and the images of $a$ and $b$ in $S/IS$. Then $\max (n_0, n'_0)$ works. $\square$

Lemma 37.31.3. Let $R \to S$ be a finite type ring map. Let $d$ be the maximum of the dimensions of fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$. Then there exists a quasi-finite ring map $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ d] \to S$.

**Proof.**
In this paragraph we reduce to the case where $R \to S$ is of finite presentation. Namely, write $S = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J$ for some ideal $J \subset R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$. Then $J$ is the union of its finitely generated ideals $J_\lambda \subset J$. Set $S_\lambda = R[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]/J_\lambda $. Then for some $\lambda $ the fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ have dimension $\leq d$, see Limits, Lemma 32.18.1. Fix such a $\lambda $. If we can find a quasi-finite $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ d] \to S_\lambda $, then of course the composition $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ d] \to S$ is quasi-finite. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R \to S$ is of finite presentation. In this paragraph we reduce to the case where $R$ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. By Algebra, Lemma 10.127.18 we can find a directed set $\Lambda $ and a system of ring maps $R_\lambda \to S_\lambda $ over $\Lambda $ whose colimit is $R \to S$ such that $S_\mu = S_\lambda \otimes _{R_\lambda } R_\mu $ for $\mu \geq \lambda $ and such that each $R_\lambda $ and $S_\lambda $ is of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. Then for $\lambda $ large enough the fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S_\lambda ) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R_\lambda )$ have dimension $\leq d$, see Limits, Lemma 32.18.4. Fix such a $\lambda $. If we can find a quasi-finite ring map $R_\lambda [t_1, \ldots , t_ d] \to S_\lambda $, then the base change $R[t_1, \ldots , t_ d] \to S$ is quasi-finite too (Algebra, Lemma 10.122.8). This reduces us the the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $R$ and $S$ are of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}$. If $d = 0$, then the ring map is quasi-finite and we are done. Assume $d > 0$. We will find an element $a \in S$ such that the fibres of the $R$-algebra map $R[x] \to S$, $x \mapsto a$ have dimension $< d$. This will finish the proof by induction.

We will prove the existence of $a$ by induction on $\dim (R)$.

Let $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ r \subset S$ be those among the minimal primes of $S$ such that $\dim _{\mathfrak q_ i}(S/R) = d$. For notation, see Algebra, Definition 10.125.1. Say $\mathfrak q_ i$ lies over the prime $\mathfrak p_ i \subset R$. We have $\text{trdeg}_{\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)}(\kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)) = d$ as $\mathfrak q_ i$ is a generic point of its fibre; for example apply Algebra, Lemma 10.116.3 to $S \otimes _ R \kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$. Hence by Lemma 37.31.1 we can find an element $a \in S$ such that the image of $a$ in $\kappa (\mathfrak q_ i)$ is transcendental over $\kappa (\mathfrak p_ i)$ for $i = 1, \ldots , r$. Consider the morphism

corresponding the $R$-algebra homomorphism $R[x] \to S$ to mapping $x$ to $a$. Let $U \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$ be the open subset where the fibres have dimension $\leq d - 1$, see Morphisms, Lemma 29.28.4. By construction $U$ contains all the generic points of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. In particular we see that $U$ contains all generic points of all the generic fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ as such points are necessarily generic points of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. Set $T = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S) \setminus U$ viewed as a reduced closed subscheme of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S)$. It follows from what we just said and the assumption that $\dim (S/R) \leq d$ that the generic fibres of $T \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ have dimension $\leq d - 1$. Hence by Lemma 37.30.1, applied several times to produce open neighbourhoods of the generic points of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$, we can find a dense open $V \subset \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ such that $T_ V \to V$ has fibres of dimension $\leq d - 1$. We conclude that for $q \in \mathbf{A}^1_ V$ the fibre of $f_ a$ over $q$ has dimension $\leq d - 1$ (as we have bounded the dimension of the fibre of $f_ a|_ U$ and of the fibre of $f_ a|_ T$).

By prime avoidance, we may assume that $V = D(f)$ for some $f \in R$. Then we see that the ring map $R_ f[x] \to S_ f$, $x \mapsto a$ has fibres of dimension $\leq d - 1$. We may replace $a$ by $fa$ and assume $a \in (f)$. By induction on $\dim (R)$ we can find an element $\overline{b} \in S/fS$ such that the fibres of $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(S/fS) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R/fR[x])$, $x \mapsto \overline{b}$ have dimension $\leq d - 1$. Let $b \in S$ be a lift of $\overline{b}$. By Lemma 37.31.2 there exists an $n > 0$ such that $a^ n + b$ still works for $R_ f \to S_ f$. On the other hand, the image of $a^ n + b$ in $S/fS$ is $\overline{b}$ and the proof is complete. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)