Lemma 104.8.1. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $K$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$ whose cohomology sheaves are parasitic. Then $R\Gamma (x, K) = 0$ for all objects $x$ of $\mathcal{X}$ lying over a scheme $U$ such that $U \to \mathcal{X}$ is flat.

## 104.8 Quasi-coherent objects in the derived category

This section is the continuation of Sheaves on Stacks, Section 96.26. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. In that section we defined a triangulated category

and we proved that if $\mathcal{X}$ is representable by an algebraic space $X$ then $\mathit{QC}(\mathcal{X})$ is equivalent to $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. It turns out that we have developed just enough theory to prove the same thing is true for any algebraic stack.

**Proof.**
Denote $g : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$ the morphism of topoi discussed in Section 104.3. Let $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{X}$ lying over a scheme $U$ such that $U \to \mathcal{X}$ is flat, i.e., $x$ is an object of $\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}$. By Lemma 104.4.2 part (2)(b) we have $R\Gamma (x, K) = R\Gamma (\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}/x, g^{-1}K)$. However, our assumption means that the cohomology sheaves of the object $g^{-1}K$ of $D(\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf})$ are zero, see Cohomology of Stacks, Definition 103.9.1. Hence $g^{-1}K = 0$ and we win.
$\square$

Lemma 104.8.2. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $K$ be an object of $D(\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$ such that $R\Gamma (x, K) = 0$ for all objects $x$ of $\mathcal{X}$ lying over an affine scheme $U$ such that $U \to \mathcal{X}$ is flat. Then $H^ i(\mathcal{X}, K) = 0$ for all $i$.

**Proof.**
Denote $g : \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}) \to \mathop{\mathit{Sh}}\nolimits (\mathcal{X}_{fppf})$ the morphism of topoi discussed in Section 104.3. By Lemma 104.4.2 part (2)(b) our assumption means that $g^{-1}K$ has vanishing cohomology over every object of $\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}$ which lies over an affine scheme. Since every object $x$ of $\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}$ has a covering by such objects, we conclude that $g^{-1}K$ has vanishing cohomology sheaves, i.e., we conclude $g^{-1}K = 0$. Then of course $R\Gamma (\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}, g^{-1}K) = 0$ which in turn implies what we want by Lemma 104.4.2 part (2)(a).
$\square$

Lemma 104.8.3. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Let $K$ be an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}})$. Then $Lg_!K$ satisfies the following property: for any morphism $x \to x'$ of $\mathcal{X}_{affine}$ the map

is a quasi-isomorphism.

**Proof.**
By Lemma 104.5.3 part (2)(c) the object $Lg_!K$ is in $D_{\textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$. It follows readily from this that the map displayed in the lemma is an isomorphism if $\mathcal{O}(x') \to \mathcal{O}(x)$ is a flat ring map; we omit the details.

In this paragraph we argue that the question is local for the étale topology. Let $x \to x'$ be a general morphism of $\mathcal{X}_{affine}$. Let $\{ x'_ i \to x'\} $ be a covering in $\mathcal{X}_{affine, {\acute{e}tale}}$. Set $x_ i = x \times _{x'} x'_ i$ so that $\{ x_ i \to x\} $ is a covering of $\mathcal{X}_{affine, {\acute{e}tale}}$ too. Then $\mathcal{O}(x') \to \prod \mathcal{O}(x'_ i)$ is a faithfully flat étale ring map and

Thus a simple algebra argument we omit shows that it suffices to prove the result in the statement of the lemma holds for each of the morphisms $x_ i \to x'_ i$ in $\mathcal{X}_{affine}$. In other words, the problem is local in the étale topology.

Choose a scheme $X$ and a surjective smooth morphism $f : X \to \mathcal{X}$. We may view $f$ as an object of $\mathcal{X}$ (by our abuse of notation) and then $(\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf} = \mathcal{X}/f$, see Sheaves on Stacks, Section 96.9. By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.19.10 for example, there exist an étale covering $\{ x'_ i \to x'\} $ such that $x'_ i : U'_ i = p(x'_ i) \to \mathcal{X}$ factors through $f$. By the result of the previous paragraph, we may assume that $x \to x'$ is a morphism which is the image of a morphism $U \to U'$ of $(\textit{Aff}/X)_{fppf}$ by the functor $(\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf} \to \mathcal{X}$. At this point we see use that the restriction to $(\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf}$ of $Lg_!K$ is equal to $f^*Lg_!K = L(g')_!(f')^*K$ by Lemma 104.3.2. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $\mathcal{X} = (\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf}$ and $x \to x'$ corresponds to the morphism of affine schemes $U \to U'$. We may still work étale (or Zariski) locally on $U'$ and hence we may assume $U' \to X$ factors through some affine open of $X$. This reduces us to the case discussed in the next paragraph.

Assume $\mathcal{X} = (\mathit{Sch}/X)_{fppf}$ where $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R)$ is an affine scheme and $x \to x'$ corresponds to the morphism of affine schemes $U \to U'$. Let $M^\bullet $ be a complex of $R$-modules representing $R\Gamma (X, K)$. By the construction in More on Algebra, Lemma 15.59.10 we may assume $M^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits P_ n^\bullet $ where each $P_ n^\bullet $ is a bounded above complex of free $R$-modules. Details omitted; see also More on Algebra, Remark 15.59.11. Consider the complex of modules $M^\bullet _{flat, fppf}$ on $X_{flat, fppf} = (\mathit{Sch}/X)_{flat, fppf}$ given by the rule

This is a complex of sheaves by the discussion in Descent, Section 35.8. There is a canonical map $M^\bullet _{flat, fppf} \to K$ which by our initial remarks of the proof produces an isomorphism on sections over the affine objects of $X_{flat, fppf}$. Since every object of $X_{flat, fppf}$ has a covering by affine objects we see that $M^\bullet _{flat, fppf}$ agrees with $K$.

Let $M^\bullet _{fppf}$ be the complex of modules on $X_{fppf}$ given by the same formula as displayed above. Recall that $Lg_!\mathcal{O} = g_!\mathcal{O} = \mathcal{O}$. Since $Lg_!$ is the left derived functor of $g_!$ we conclude that $Lg_!P_{n, flat, fppf}^\bullet = P_{n, fppf}^\bullet $. Since the functor $Lg_!$ commutes with homotopy colimits (or by its construction in Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.37.2) and since $M^\bullet = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits P_ n^\bullet $ we conclude that $Lg_!M^\bullet _{flat, fppf} = M^\bullet _{fppf}$. Say $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$, $U' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A')$ and $U \to U'$ corresponds to the ring map $A' \to A$. From the above we see that

Since $M^\bullet $ is a K-flat complex of $R$-modules, by transitivity of tensor product it follows that

is a quasi-isomorphism as desired. $\square$

Proposition 104.8.4. Let $\mathcal{X}$ be an algebraic stack. Then $\mathit{QC}(\mathcal{X})$ is canonically equivalent to $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$.

**Proof.**
By Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.26.6 pullback by the comparison morphism $\epsilon : \mathcal{X}_{affine, fppf} \to \mathcal{X}_{affine}$ identifies $\mathit{QC}(\mathcal{X})$ with a full subcategory $Q_\mathcal {X} \subset D(\mathcal{X}_{affine, fppf}, \mathcal{O})$. Using the equivalence of ringed topoi in Sheaves on Stacks, Equation (96.24.3.1) we may and do view $Q_\mathcal {X}$ as a full subcategory of $D(\mathcal{X}_{fppf}, \mathcal{O})$.

Similarly by Lemma 104.5.4 and Remark 104.5.5 we find that $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$ may be viewed as the left orthogonal $\mathcal{A}$ of the left admissible subcategory $D_{\textit{Parasitic} \cap \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$ of $D_{\textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$.

To finish we will show that $Q_\mathcal {X}$ is equal to $\mathcal{A}$ as subcategories of $D(\mathcal{X}_{fppf}, \mathcal{O})$.

Step 1: $Q_\mathcal {X}$ is contained in $D_{\textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$. An object $K$ of $Q_\mathcal {X}$ is characterized by the property that $K$, viewed as an object of $D(\mathcal{X}_{affine, fppf}, \mathcal{O})$ satisfies $R\epsilon _*K$ is an object of $\mathit{QC}(\mathcal{X}_{affine}, \mathcal{O})$. This in turn means exactly that for all morphisms $x \to x'$ of $\mathcal{X}_{affine}$ the map

is an isomorphism, see footnote in statement of Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.43.12. Now, if $x' \to x$ lies over a flat morphism of affine schemes, then this means that

This clearly means that $H^ i(K)$ is a sheaf for the étale topology (Sheaves on Stacks, Lemma 96.25.1) and that it has the flat base change property (small detail omitted).

Step 2: $Q_\mathcal {X}$ is contained in $\mathcal{A}$. To see this it suffices to show that for $K$ in $Q_\mathcal {X}$ we have $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (K, P) = 0$ for all $P$ in $D_{\textit{Parasitic} \cap \textit{LQCoh}^{fbc}}(\mathcal{O}_\mathcal {X})$. Consider the object

Let $x$ be an object of $\mathcal{X}$ which lies over an affine scheme $U = p(x)$. By Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.35.1 we have the first equality in

The second equality stems from the fact that the topos of the site $\mathcal{X}/x$ is equivalent to the topos of the site $\mathcal{X}_{affine}/x$, see Sheaves on Stacks, Equation (96.24.3.1). We may write $K = \epsilon ^*N$ for some $N$ in $\mathit{QC}(\mathcal{O})$. Then by Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.43.13 we see that

By Lemma 104.8.1 we see that $R\Gamma (x, P) = 0$ if $U \to \mathcal{X}$ is flat and hence $R\Gamma (x, H) = 0$ under the same hypothesis. By Lemma 104.8.2 we conclude that $R\Gamma (\mathcal{X}, H) = 0$ and therefore $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (K, P) = 0$.

Step 3: $\mathcal{A}$ is contained in $Q_\mathcal {X}$. Let $K$ be an object of $\mathcal{A}$ and let $x \to x'$ be a morphism of $\mathcal{X}_{affine}$. We have to show that

is a quasi-isomorphism, see footnote in statement of Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.43.12. By the proof of Lemma 104.5.4 and the discussion in Remark 104.5.5 we see that $\mathcal{A}$ is the image of the restriction of $Lg_!$ to $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}})$. Thus we may assume $K = Lg_!M$ for some $M$ in $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}_{flat, fppf}})$. Then the desired equality follow from Lemma 104.8.3. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)