Definition 10.104.1. A Noetherian local ring $R$ is called *Cohen-Macaulay* if it is Cohen-Macaulay as a module over itself.

## 10.104 Cohen-Macaulay rings

Most of the results of this section are special cases of the results in Section 10.103.

Note that this is equivalent to requiring the existence of a $R$-regular sequence $x_1, \ldots , x_ d$ of the maximal ideal such that $R/(x_1, \ldots , x_ d)$ has dimension $0$. We will usually just say “regular sequence” and not “$R$-regular sequence”.

Lemma 10.104.2. Let $R$ be a Noetherian local Cohen-Macaulay ring with maximal ideal $\mathfrak m $. Let $x_1, \ldots , x_ c \in \mathfrak m$ be elements. Then

If so $x_1, \ldots , x_ c$ can be extended to a regular sequence of length $\dim (R)$ and each quotient $R/(x_1, \ldots , x_ i)$ is a Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension $\dim (R) - i$.

**Proof.**
Special case of Proposition 10.103.4.
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.3. Let $R$ be Noetherian local. Suppose $R$ is Cohen-Macaulay of dimension $d$. Any maximal chain of ideals $\mathfrak p_0 \subset \mathfrak p_1 \subset \ldots \subset \mathfrak p_ n$ has length $n = d$.

**Proof.**
Special case of Lemma 10.103.9.
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.4. Suppose $R$ is a Noetherian local Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension $d$. For any prime $\mathfrak p \subset R$ we have

**Proof.**
Follows immediately from Lemma 10.104.3. (Also, this is a special case of Lemma 10.103.10.)
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.5. Suppose $R$ is a Cohen-Macaulay local ring. For any prime $\mathfrak p \subset R$ the ring $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is Cohen-Macaulay as well.

**Proof.**
Special case of Lemma 10.103.11.
$\square$

Definition 10.104.6. A Noetherian ring $R$ is called *Cohen-Macaulay* if all its local rings are Cohen-Macaulay.

Lemma 10.104.7. Suppose $R$ is a Noetherian Cohen-Macaulay ring. Any polynomial algebra over $R$ is Cohen-Macaulay.

**Proof.**
Special case of Lemma 10.103.13.
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.8. Let $R$ be a Noetherian local Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension $d$. Let $0 \to K \to R^{\oplus n} \to M \to 0$ be an exact sequence of $R$-modules. Then either $M = 0$, or $\text{depth}(K) > \text{depth}(M)$, or $\text{depth}(K) = \text{depth}(M) = d$.

**Proof.**
This is a special case of Lemma 10.72.6.
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.9. Let $R$ be a local Noetherian Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension $d$. Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module of depth $e$. There exists an exact complex

with each $F_ i$ finite free and $K$ maximal Cohen-Macaulay.

**Proof.**
Immediate from the definition and Lemma 10.104.8.
$\square$

Lemma 10.104.10. Let $\varphi : A \to B$ be a map of local rings. Assume that $B$ is Noetherian and Cohen-Macaulay and that $\mathfrak m_ B = \sqrt{\varphi (\mathfrak m_ A) B}$. Then there exists a sequence of elements $f_1, \ldots , f_{\dim (B)}$ in $A$ such that $\varphi (f_1), \ldots , \varphi (f_{\dim (B)})$ is a regular sequence in $B$.

**Proof.**
By induction on $\dim (B)$ it suffices to prove: If $\dim (B) \geq 1$, then we can find an element $f$ of $A$ which maps to a nonzerodivisor in $B$. By Lemma 10.104.2 it suffices to find $f \in A$ whose image in $B$ is not contained in any of the finitely many minimal primes $\mathfrak q_1, \ldots , \mathfrak q_ r$ of $B$. By the assumption that $\mathfrak m_ B = \sqrt{\varphi (\mathfrak m_ A) B}$ we see that $\mathfrak m_ A \not\subset \varphi ^{-1}(\mathfrak q_ i)$. Hence we can find $f$ by Lemma 10.15.2.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (7)

Comment #244 by Olaf Schnuerer on

Comment #246 by Johan on

Comment #247 by Olaf Schnuerer on

Comment #249 by Johan on

Comment #250 by Johan on

Comment #2217 by David Savitt on

Comment #2224 by Johan on