29.56 Zariski's Main Theorem (algebraic version)
This is the version you can prove using purely algebraic methods. Before we can prove more powerful versions (for non-affine morphisms) we need to develop more tools. See Cohomology of Schemes, Section 30.21 and More on Morphisms, Section 37.43.
Theorem 29.56.1 (Algebraic version of Zariski's Main Theorem). Let f : Y \to X be an affine morphism of schemes. Assume f is of finite type. Let X' be the normalization of X in Y. Picture:
\xymatrix{ Y \ar[rd]_ f \ar[rr]_{f'} & & X' \ar[ld]^\nu \\ & X & }
Then there exists an open subscheme U' \subset X' such that
(f')^{-1}(U') \to U' is an isomorphism, and
(f')^{-1}(U') \subset Y is the set of points at which f is quasi-finite.
Proof.
There is an immediate reduction to the case where X and hence Y are affine. Say X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) and Y = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Then X' = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A'), where A' is the integral closure of R in A, see Definitions 29.53.2 and 29.53.3. By Algebra, Theorem 10.123.12 for every y \in Y at which f is quasi-finite, there exists an open U'_ y \subset X' such that (f')^{-1}(U'_ y) \to U'_ y is an isomorphism. Set U' = \bigcup U'_ y where y \in Y ranges over all points where f is quasi-finite. It remains to show that f is quasi-finite at all points of (f')^{-1}(U'). If y \in (f')^{-1}(U') with image x \in X, then we see that Y_ x \to X'_ x is an isomorphism in a neighbourhood of y. Hence there is no point of Y_ x which specializes to y, since this is true for f'(y) in X'_ x, see Lemma 29.44.8. By Lemma 29.20.6 part (3) this implies f is quasi-finite at y.
\square
We can use the algebraic version of Zariski's Main Theorem to show that the set of points where a morphism is quasi-finite is open.
Lemma 29.56.2.slogan Let f : X \to S be a morphism of schemes. The set of points of X where f is quasi-finite is an open U \subset X. The induced morphism U \to S is locally quasi-finite.
Proof.
Suppose f is quasi-finite at x. Let x \in U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A) \subset X, V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(R) \subset S be affine opens as in Definition 29.20.1. By either Theorem 29.56.1 above or Algebra, Lemma 10.123.13, the set of primes \mathfrak q at which R \to A is quasi-finite is open in \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A). Since these all correspond to points of X where f is quasi-finite we get the first statement. The second statement is obvious.
\square
We will improve the following lemma to general quasi-finite separated morphisms later, see More on Morphisms, Lemma 37.43.3.
Lemma 29.56.3. Let f : Y \to X be a morphism of schemes. Assume
X and Y are affine, and
f is quasi-finite.
Then there exists a diagram
\xymatrix{ Y \ar[rd]_ f \ar[rr]_ j & & Z \ar[ld]^\pi \\ & X & }
with Z affine, \pi finite and j an open immersion.
Proof.
This is Algebra, Lemma 10.123.14 reformulated in the language of schemes.
\square
Lemma 29.56.4. Let f : Y \to X be a quasi-finite morphism of schemes. Let T \subset Y be a closed nowhere dense subset of Y. Then f(T) \subset X is a nowhere dense subset of X.
Proof.
As in the proof of Lemma 29.48.7 this reduces immediately to the case where the base X is affine. In this case Y = \bigcup _{i = 1, \ldots , n} Y_ i is a finite union of affine opens (as f is quasi-compact). Since each T \cap Y_ i is nowhere dense, and since a finite union of nowhere dense sets is nowhere dense (see Topology, Lemma 5.21.2), it suffices to prove that the image f(T \cap Y_ i) is nowhere dense in X. This reduces us to the case where both X and Y are affine. At this point we apply Lemma 29.56.3 above to get a diagram
\xymatrix{ Y \ar[rd]_ f \ar[rr]_ j & & Z \ar[ld]^\pi \\ & X & }
with Z affine, \pi finite and j an open immersion. Set \overline{T} = \overline{j(T)} \subset Z. By Topology, Lemma 5.21.3 we see \overline{T} is nowhere dense in Z. Since f(T) \subset \pi (\overline{T}) the lemma follows from the corresponding result in the finite case, see Lemma 29.48.7.
\square
Comments (2)
Comment #377 by Tyler Lawson on
Comment #378 by Tyler Lawson on