Lemma 69.5.1. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} X_ i$ be the limit of a directed inverse system of algebraic spaces over $S$ with affine transition morphisms (Lemma 69.4.1). If each $X_ i$ is decent (for example quasi-separated or locally separated) then $|X| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i |X_ i|$ as sets.

## 69.5 Descending properties

This section is the analogue of Limits, Section 32.4.

**Proof.**
There is a canonical map $|X| \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$. Choose $0 \in I$. If $W_0 \subset X_0$ is an open subspace, then we have $f_0^{-1}W_0 = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq 0} f_{i0}^{-1}W_0$, see Lemma 69.4.1. Hence, if we can prove the lemma for inverse systems where $X_0$ is quasi-compact, then the lemma follows in general. Thus we may and do assume $X_0$ is quasi-compact.

Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U_ i = X_ i \times _{X_0} U_0$ and $U = X \times _{X_0} U_0$. Set $R_ i = U_ i \times _{X_ i} U_ i$ and $R = U \times _ X U$. Recall that $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ and $R = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits R_ i$, see proof of Lemma 69.4.1. Recall that $|X| = |U|/|R|$ and $|X_ i| = |U_ i|/|R_ i|$. By Limits, Lemma 32.4.6 we have $|U| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |U_ i|$ and $|R| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |R_ i|$.

Surjectivity of $|X| \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$. Let $(x_ i) \in \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$. Denote $S_ i \subset |U_ i|$ the inverse image of $x_ i$. This is a finite nonempty set by the definition of decent spaces (Decent Spaces, Definition 67.6.1). Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits S_ i$ is nonempty, see Categories, Lemma 4.21.7. Let $(u_ i) \in \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits S_ i \subset \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |U_ i|$. By the above this determines a point $u \in |U|$ which maps to an $x \in |X|$ mapping to the given element $(x_ i)$ of $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$.

Injectivity of $|X| \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$. Suppose that $x, x' \in |X|$ map to the same point of $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$. Choose lifts $u, u' \in |U|$ and denote $u_ i, u'_ i \in |U_ i|$ the images. For each $i$ let $T_ i \subset |R_ i|$ be the set of points mapping to $(u_ i, u'_ i) \in |U_ i| \times |U_ i|$. This is a finite set by the definition of decent spaces (Decent Spaces, Definition 67.6.1). Moreover $T_ i$ is nonempty as we've assumed that $x$ and $x'$ map to the same point of $X_ i$. Hence $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i$ is nonempty, see Categories, Lemma 4.21.7. As before let $r \in |R| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |R_ i|$ be a point corresponding to an element of $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits T_ i$. Then $r$ maps to $(u, u')$ in $|U| \times |U|$ by construction and we see that $x = x'$ in $|X|$ as desired.

Parenthetical statement: A quasi-separated algebraic space is decent, see Decent Spaces, Section 67.6 (the key observation to this is Properties of Spaces, Lemma 65.6.7). A locally separated algebraic space is decent by Decent Spaces, Lemma 67.15.2. $\square$

Lemma 69.5.2. With same notation and assumptions as in Lemma 69.5.1 we have $|X| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i |X_ i|$ as topological spaces.

**Proof.**
We will use the criterion of Topology, Lemma 5.14.3. We have seen that $|X| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i |X_ i|$ as sets in Lemma 69.5.1. The maps $f_ i : X \to X_ i$ are morphisms of algebraic spaces hence determine continuous maps $|X| \to |X_ i|$. Thus $f_ i^{-1}(U_ i)$ is open for each open $U_ i \subset |X_ i|$. Finally, let $x \in |X|$ and let $x \in V \subset |X|$ be an open neighbourhood. We have to find an $i$ and an open neighbourhood $W_ i \subset |X_ i|$ of the image $x$ with $f_ i^{-1}(W_ i) \subset V$. Choose $0 \in I$. Choose a scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U = X \times _{X_0} U_0$ and $U_ i = X_ i \times _{X_0} U_0$ for $i \geq 0$. Then $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq 0} U_ i$ in the category of schemes by Lemma 69.4.1. Choose $u \in U$ mapping to $x$. By the result for schemes (Limits, Lemma 32.4.2) we can find an $i \geq 0$ and an open neighbourhood $E_ i \subset U_ i$ of the image of $u$ whose inverse image in $U$ is contained in the inverse image of $V$ in $U$. Then we can set $W_ i \subset |X_ i|$ equal to the image of $E_ i$. This works because $|U_ i| \to |X_ i|$ is open.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.3. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} X_ i$ be the limit of a directed inverse system of algebraic spaces over $S$ with affine transition morphisms (Lemma 69.4.1). If each $X_ i$ is quasi-compact and nonempty, then $|X|$ is nonempty.

**Proof.**
Choose $0 \in I$. Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U_ i = X_ i \times _{X_0} U_0$ and $U = X \times _{X_0} U_0$. Then each $U_ i$ is a nonempty affine scheme. Hence $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ is nonempty (Limits, Lemma 32.4.3) and thus $X$ is nonempty.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.4. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} X_ i$ be the limit of a directed inverse system of algebraic spaces over $S$ with affine transition morphisms (Lemma 69.4.1). Let $x \in |X|$ with images $x_ i \in |X_ i|$. If each $X_ i$ is decent, then $\overline{\{ x\} } = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _ i \overline{\{ x_ i\} }$ as sets and as algebraic spaces if endowed with reduced induced scheme structure.

**Proof.**
Set $Z = \overline{\{ x\} } \subset |X|$ and $Z_ i = \overline{\{ x_ i\} } \subset |X_ i|$. Since $|X| \to |X_ i|$ is continuous we see that $Z$ maps into $Z_ i$ for each $i$. Hence we obtain an injective map $Z \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i$ because $|X| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$ as sets (Lemma 69.5.1). Suppose that $x' \in |X|$ is not in $Z$. Then there is an open subset $U \subset |X|$ with $x' \in U$ and $x \not\in U$. Since $|X| = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits |X_ i|$ as topological spaces (Lemma 69.5.2) we can write $U = \bigcup _{j \in J} f_ j^{-1}(U_ j)$ for some subset $J \subset I$ and opens $U_ j \subset |X_ j|$, see Topology, Lemma 5.14.2. Then we see that for some $j \in J$ we have $f_ j(x') \in U_ j$ and $f_ j(x) \not\in U_ j$. In other words, we see that $f_ j(x') \not\in Z_ j$. Thus $Z = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i$ as sets.

Next, endow $Z$ and $Z_ i$ with their reduced induced scheme structures, see Properties of Spaces, Definition 65.12.5. The transition morphisms $X_{i'} \to X_ i$ induce affine morphisms $Z_{i'} \to Z_ i$ and the projections $X \to X_ i$ induce compatible morphisms $Z \to Z_ i$. Hence we obtain morphisms $Z \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i \to X$ of algebraic spaces. By Lemma 69.4.3 we see that $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i \to X$ is a closed immersion. By Lemma 69.4.4 the algebraic space $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i$ is reduced. By the above $Z \to \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i$ is bijective on points. By uniqueness of the reduced induced closed subscheme structure we find that this morphism is an isomorphism of algebraic spaces. $\square$

Situation 69.5.5. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \in I} X_ i$ be the limit of a directed inverse system of algebraic spaces over $S$ with affine transition morphisms (Lemma 69.4.1). We assume that $X_ i$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated for all $i \in I$. We also choose an element $0 \in I$.

Lemma 69.5.6. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. Suppose that $\mathcal{F}_0$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf on $X_0$. Set $\mathcal{F}_ i = f_{0i}^*\mathcal{F}_0$ for $i \geq 0$ and set $\mathcal{F} = f_0^*\mathcal{F}_0$. Then

**Proof.**
Choose a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$ where $U_0$ is an affine scheme (Properties of Spaces, Lemma 65.6.3). Set $U_ i = X_ i \times _{X_0} U_0$. Set $R_0 = U_0 \times _{X_0} U_0$ and $R_ i = R_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$. In the proof of Lemma 69.4.1 we have seen that there exists a presentation $X = U/R$ with $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ and $R = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits R_ i$. Note that $U_ i$ and $U$ are affine and that $R_ i$ and $R$ are quasi-compact and separated (as $X_ i$ is quasi-separated). Hence Limits, Lemma 32.4.7 implies that

The lemma follows as $\Gamma (X, \mathcal{F}) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(R))$ and similarly $\Gamma (X_ i, \mathcal{F}_ i) = \mathop{\mathrm{Ker}}(\mathcal{F}_ i(U_ i) \to \mathcal{F}_ i(R_ i))$ $\square$

Lemma 69.5.7. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. For any quasi-compact open subspace $U \subset X$ there exists an $i$ and a quasi-compact open $U_ i \subset X_ i$ whose inverse image in $X$ is $U$.

**Proof.**
Follows formally from the construction of limits in Lemma 69.4.1 and the corresponding result for schemes: Limits, Lemma 32.4.11.
$\square$

The following lemma will be superseded by the stronger Lemma 69.6.10.

Lemma 69.5.8. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. Let $f_0 : Y_0 \to Z_0$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $X_0$. Assume (a) $Y_0 \to X_0$ and $Z_0 \to X_0$ are representable, (b) $Y_0$, $Z_0$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated, (c) $f_0$ locally of finite presentation, and (d) $Y_0 \times _{X_0} X \to Z_0 \times _{X_0} X$ an isomorphism. Then there exists an $i \geq 0$ such that $Y_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i \to Z_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$ is an isomorphism.

**Proof.**
Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U_ i = U_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$ and $U = U_0 \times _{X_0} X$. Apply Limits, Lemma 32.8.11 to see that $Y_0 \times _{X_0} U_ i \to Z_0 \times _{X_0} U_ i$ is an isomorphism of schemes for some $i \geq 0$ (details omitted). As $U_ i \to X_ i$ is surjective étale, it follows that $Y_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i \to Z_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$ is an isomorphism (details omitted).
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.9. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. If $X$ is separated, then $X_ i$ is separated for some $i \in I$.

**Proof.**
Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. For $i \geq 0$ set $U_ i = U_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$ and set $U = U_0 \times _{X_0} X$. Note that $U_ i$ and $U$ are affine schemes which come equipped with surjective étale morphisms $U_ i \to X_ i$ and $U \to X$. Set $R_ i = U_ i \times _{X_ i} U_ i$ and $R = U \times _ X U$ with projections $s_ i, t_ i : R_ i \to U_ i$ and $s, t : R \to U$. Note that $R_ i$ and $R$ are quasi-compact separated schemes (as the algebraic spaces $X_ i$ and $X$ are quasi-separated). The maps $s_ i : R_ i \to U_ i$ and $s : R \to U$ are of finite type. By definition $X_ i$ is separated if and only if $(t_ i, s_ i) : R_ i \to U_ i \times U_ i$ is a closed immersion, and since $X$ is separated by assumption, the morphism $(t, s) : R \to U \times U$ is a closed immersion. Since $R \to U$ is of finite type, there exists an $i$ such that the morphism $R \to U_ i \times U$ is a closed immersion (Limits, Lemma 32.4.16). Fix such an $i \in I$. Apply Limits, Lemma 32.8.5 to the system of morphisms $R_{i'} \to U_ i \times U_{i'}$ for $i' \geq i$ (this is permissible as indeed $R_{i'} = R_ i \times _{U_ i \times U_ i} U_ i \times U_{i'}$) to see that $R_{i'} \to U_ i \times U_{i'}$ is a closed immersion for $i'$ sufficiently large. This implies immediately that $R_{i'} \to U_{i'} \times U_{i'}$ is a closed immersion finishing the proof of the lemma.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.10. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. If $X$ is affine, then there exists an $i$ such that $X_ i$ is affine.

**Proof.**
Choose $0 \in I$. Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U = U_0 \times _{X_0} X$ and $U_ i = U_0 \times _{X_0} X_ i$ for $i \geq 0$. Since the transition morphisms are affine, the algebraic spaces $U_ i$ and $U$ are affine. Thus $U \to X$ is an étale morphism of affine schemes. Hence we can write $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$, $U = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$ and

such that $\Delta = \det (\partial g_\lambda /\partial x_\mu )$ is invertible in $B$, see Algebra, Lemma 10.143.2. Set $A_ i = \mathcal{O}_{X_ i}(X_ i)$. We have $A = \mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits A_ i$ by Lemma 69.5.6. After increasing $0$ we may assume we have $g_{1, i}, \ldots , g_{n, i} \in A_ i[x_1, \ldots , x_ n]$ mapping to $g_1, \ldots , g_ n$. Set

for all $i \geq 0$. Increasing $0$ if necessary we may assume that $\Delta _ i = \det (\partial g_{\lambda , i}/\partial x_\mu )$ is invertible in $B_ i$ for all $i \geq 0$. Thus $A_ i \to B_ i$ is an étale ring map. After increasing $0$ we may assume also that $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$ is surjective, see Limits, Lemma 32.8.15. Increasing $0$ yet again we may choose elements $h_{1, i}, \ldots , h_{n, i} \in \mathcal{O}_{U_ i}(U_ i)$ which map to the classes of $x_1, \ldots , x_ n$ in $B = \mathcal{O}_ U(U)$ and such that $g_{\lambda , i}(h_{\nu , i}) = 0$ in $\mathcal{O}_{U_ i}(U_ i)$. Thus we obtain a commutative diagram

By construction $B_ i = B_0 \otimes _{A_0} A_ i$ and $B = B_0 \otimes _{A_0} A$. Consider the morphism

This is a morphism of quasi-compact and quasi-separated algebraic spaces representable, separated and étale over $X_0$. The base change of $f_0$ to $X$ is an isomorphism by our choices. Hence Lemma 69.5.8 guarantees that there exists an $i$ such that the base change of $f_0$ to $X_ i$ is an isomorphism, in other words the diagram (69.5.10.1) is cartesian. Thus Descent, Lemma 35.39.1 applied to the fppf covering $\{ \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B_ i) \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)\} $ combined with Descent, Lemma 35.37.1 give that $X_ i \to \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$ is representable by a scheme affine over $\mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$ as desired. (Of course it then also follows that $X_ i = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A_ i)$ but we don't need this.) $\square$

Lemma 69.5.11. Notation and assumptions as in Situation 69.5.5. If $X$ is a scheme, then there exists an $i$ such that $X_ i$ is a scheme.

**Proof.**
Choose a finite affine open covering $X = \bigcup W_ j$. By Lemma 69.5.7 we can find an $i \in I$ and open subspaces $W_{j, i} \subset X_ i$ whose base change to $X$ is $W_ j \to X$. By Lemma 69.5.10 we may assume that each $W_{j, i}$ is an affine scheme. This means that $X_ i$ is a scheme (see for example Properties of Spaces, Section 65.13).
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.12. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $B$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a directed limit of algebraic spaces over $B$ with affine transition morphisms. Let $Y \to X$ be a morphism of algebraic spaces over $B$.

If $Y \to X$ is a closed immersion, $X_ i$ quasi-compact, and $Y \to B$ locally of finite type, then $Y \to X_ i$ is a closed immersion for $i$ large enough.

If $Y \to X$ is an immersion, $X_ i$ quasi-separated, $Y \to B$ locally of finite type, and $Y$ quasi-compact, then $Y \to X_ i$ is an immersion for $i$ large enough.

If $Y \to X$ is an isomorphism, $X_ i$ quasi-compact, $X_ i \to B$ locally of finite type, the transition morphisms $X_{i'} \to X_ i$ are closed immersions, and $Y \to B$ is locally of finite presentation, then $Y \to X_ i$ is an isomorphism for $i$ large enough.

If $Y \to X$ is a monomorphism, $X_ i$ quasi-separated, $Y \to B$ locally of finite type, and $Y$ quasi-compact, then $Y \to X_ i$ is a monomorphism for $i$ large enough.

**Proof.**
Proof of (1). Choose $0 \in I$. As $X_0$ is quasi-compact, we can choose an affine scheme $W$ and an étale morphism $W \to B$ such that the image of $|X_0| \to |B|$ is contained in $|W| \to |B|$. Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and an étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0 \times _ B W$ such that $U_0 \to X_0$ is surjective. (This is possible by our choice of $W$ and the fact that $X_0$ is quasi-compact; details omitted.) Let $V \to Y$, resp. $U \to X$, resp. $U_ i \to X_ i$ be the base change of $U_0 \to X_0$ (for $i \geq 0$). It suffices to prove that $V \to U_ i$ is a closed immersion for $i$ sufficiently large. Thus we reduce to proving the result for $V \to U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ over $W$. This follows from the case of schemes, which is Limits, Lemma 32.4.16.

Proof of (2). Choose $0 \in I$. Choose a quasi-compact open subspace $X'_0 \subset X_0$ such that $Y \to X_0$ factors through $X'_0$. After replacing $X_ i$ by the inverse image of $X'_0$ for $i \geq 0$ we may assume all $X_ i'$ are quasi-compact and quasi-separated. Let $U \subset X$ be a quasi-compact open such that $Y \to X$ factors through a closed immersion $Y \to U$ ($U$ exists as $Y$ is quasi-compact). By Lemma 69.5.7 we may assume that $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ with $U_ i \subset X_ i$ quasi-compact open. By part (1) we see that $Y \to U_ i$ is a closed immersion for some $i$. Thus (2) holds.

Proof of (3). Choose $0 \in I$. Choose an affine scheme $U_0$ and a surjective étale morphism $U_0 \to X_0$. Set $U_ i = X_ i \times _{X_0} U_0$, $U = X \times _{X_0} U_0 = Y \times _{X_0} U_0$. Then $U = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits U_ i$ is a limit of affine schemes, the transition maps of the system are closed immersions, and $U \to U_0$ is of finite presentation (because $U \to B$ is locally of finite presentation and $U_0 \to B$ is locally of finite type and Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.28.9). Thus we've reduced to the following algebra fact: If $A = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits A_ i$ is a directed colimit of $R$-algebras with surjective transition maps and $A$ of finite presentation over $A_0$, then $A = A_ i$ for some $i$. Namely, write $A = A_0/(f_1, \ldots , f_ n)$. Pick $i$ such that $f_1, \ldots , f_ n$ map to zero under the surjective map $A_0 \to A_ i$.

Proof of (4). Set $Z_ i = Y \times _{X_ i} Y$. As the transition morphisms $X_{i'} \to X_ i$ are affine hence separated, the transition morphisms $Z_{i'} \to Z_ i$ are closed immersions, see Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.4.5. We have $\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits Z_ i = Y \times _ X Y = Y$ as $Y \to X$ is a monomorphism. Choose $0 \in I$. Since $Y \to X_0$ is locally of finite type (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.23.6) the morphism $Y \to Z_0$ is locally of finite presentation (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.28.10). The morphisms $Z_ i \to Z_0$ are locally of finite type (they are closed immersions). Finally, $Z_ i = Y \times _{X_ i} Y$ is quasi-compact as $X_ i$ is quasi-separated and $Y$ is quasi-compact. Thus part (3) applies to $Y = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits _{i \geq 0} Z_ i$ over $Z_0$ and we conclude $Y = Z_ i$ for some $i$. This proves (4) and the lemma. $\square$

Lemma 69.5.13. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $Y$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a directed limit of algebraic spaces over $Y$ with affine transition morphisms. Assume

$Y$ is quasi-separated,

$X_ i$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

the morphism $X \to Y$ is separated.

Then $X_ i \to Y$ is separated for all $i$ large enough.

**Proof.**
Let $0 \in I$. Choose an affine scheme $W$ and an étale morphism $W \to Y$ such that the image of $|W| \to |Y|$ contains the image of $|X_0| \to |Y|$. This is possible as $X_0$ is quasi-compact. It suffices to check that $W \times _ Y X_ i \to W$ is separated for some $i \geq 0$ because the diagonal of $W \times _ Y X_ i$ over $W$ is the base change of $X_ i \to X_ i \times _ Y X_ i$ by the surjective étale morphism $(X_ i \times _ Y X_ i) \times _ Y W \to X_ i \times _ Y X_ i$. Since $Y$ is quasi-separated the algebraic spaces $W \times _ Y X_ i$ are quasi-compact (as well as quasi-separated). Thus we may base change to $W$ and assume $Y$ is an affine scheme. When $Y$ is an affine scheme, we have to show that $X_ i$ is a separated algebraic space for $i$ large enough and we are given that $X$ is a separated algebraic space. Thus this case follows from Lemma 69.5.9.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.14. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $Y$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a directed limit of algebraic spaces over $Y$ with affine transition morphisms. Assume

$Y$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

$X_ i$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

$X \to Y$ affine.

Then $X_ i \to Y$ is affine for $i$ large enough.

**Proof.**
Choose an affine scheme $W$ and a surjective étale morphism $W \to Y$. Then $X \times _ Y W$ is affine and it suffices to check that $X_ i \times _ Y W$ is affine for some $i$ (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.20.3). This follows from Lemma 69.5.10.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.15. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $Y$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a directed limit of algebraic spaces over $Y$ with affine transition morphisms. Assume

$Y$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

$X_ i$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

the transition morphisms $X_{i'} \to X_ i$ are finite,

$X_ i \to Y$ locally of finite type

$X \to Y$ integral.

Then $X_ i \to Y$ is finite for $i$ large enough.

**Proof.**
Choose an affine scheme $W$ and a surjective étale morphism $W \to Y$. Then $X \times _ Y W$ is finite over $W$ and it suffices to check that $X_ i \times _ Y W$ is finite over $W$ for some $i$ (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.45.3). By Lemma 69.5.11 this reduces us to the case of schemes. In the case of schemes it follows from Limits, Lemma 32.4.19.
$\square$

Lemma 69.5.16. Let $S$ be a scheme. Let $Y$ be an algebraic space over $S$. Let $X = \mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits X_ i$ be a directed limit of algebraic spaces over $Y$ with affine transition morphisms. Assume

$Y$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

$X_ i$ quasi-compact and quasi-separated,

the transition morphisms $X_{i'} \to X_ i$ are closed immersions,

$X_ i \to Y$ locally of finite type

$X \to Y$ is a closed immersion.

Then $X_ i \to Y$ is a closed immersion for $i$ large enough.

**Proof.**
Choose an affine scheme $W$ and a surjective étale morphism $W \to Y$. Then $X \times _ Y W$ is a closed subspace of $W$ and it suffices to check that $X_ i \times _ Y W$ is a closed subspace $W$ for some $i$ (Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 66.12.1). By Lemma 69.5.11 this reduces us to the case of schemes. In the case of schemes it follows from Limits, Lemma 32.4.20.
$\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)