Lemma 36.15.1. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $U$ be a quasi-compact open subscheme. Let $P$ be a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ U)$. Then $P$ is a direct summand of the restriction of a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$.

## 36.15 Generating derived categories

In this section we prove that the derived category $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ of a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme can be generated by a single perfect object. We urge the reader to read the proof of this result in the wonderful paper by Bondal and van den Bergh, see [BvdB].

**Proof.**
Special case of Lemma 36.13.10.
$\square$

Lemma 36.15.2. In Situation 36.9.1 denote $j : U \to X$ the open immersion and let $K$ be the perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ corresponding to the Koszul complex on $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ over $A$. For $E \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the following are equivalent

$E = Rj_*(E|_ U)$, and

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(K[n], E) = 0$ for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$.

**Proof.**
Choose a distinguished triangle $E \to Rj_*(E|_ U) \to N \to E[1]$. Observe that

for all $n$ as $K|_ U = 0$. Thus it suffices to prove the result for $N$. In other words, we may assume that $E$ restricts to zero on $U$. Observe that there are distinguished triangles

of Koszul complexes, see More on Algebra, Lemma 15.28.11. Hence if $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(K[n], E) = 0$ for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$ then the same thing is true for the $K$ replaced by $K_ e$ as in Lemma 36.9.6. Thus our lemma follows immediately from that one and the fact that $E$ is determined by the complex of $A$-modules $R\Gamma (X, E)$, see Lemma 36.3.5. $\square$

Theorem 36.15.3. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. The category $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ can be generated by a single perfect object. More precisely, there exists a perfect object $P$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ such that for $E \in D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the following are equivalent

$E = 0$, and

$\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ X)}(P[n], E) = 0$ for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$.

**Proof.**
We will prove this using the induction principle of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.1.

If $X$ is affine, then $\mathcal{O}_ X$ is a perfect generator. This follows from Lemma 36.3.5.

Assume that $X = U \cup V$ is an open covering with $U$ quasi-compact such that the theorem holds for $U$ and $V$ is an affine open. Let $P$ be a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ U)$ which is a generator for $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ U)$. Using Lemma 36.15.1 we may choose a perfect object $Q$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ whose restriction to $U$ is a direct sum one of whose summands is $P$. Say $V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$. Let $Z = X \setminus U$. This is a closed subset of $V$ with $V \setminus Z$ quasi-compact. Choose $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in A$ such that $Z = V(f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$. Let $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ V)$ be the perfect object corresponding to the Koszul complex on $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ over $A$. Note that since $K$ is supported on $Z \subset V$ closed, the pushforward $K' = R(V \to X)_*K$ is a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ whose restriction to $V$ is $K$ (see Cohomology, Lemma 20.46.10). We claim that $Q \oplus K'$ is a generator for $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$.

Let $E$ be an object of $D_\mathit{QCoh}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ such that there are no nontrivial maps from any shift of $Q \oplus K'$ into $E$. By Cohomology, Lemma 20.33.6 we have $K' = R(V \to X)_! K$ and hence

Thus by Lemma 36.15.2 the vanishing of these groups implies that $E|_ V$ is isomorphic to $R(U \cap V \to V)_*E|_{U \cap V}$. This implies that $E = R(U \to X)_*E|_ U$ (small detail omitted). If this is the case then

which contains $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(P[n], E|_ U)$ as a direct summand. Thus by our choice of $P$ the vanishing of these groups implies that $E|_ U$ is zero. Whence $E$ is zero. $\square$

The following result is an strengthening of Theorem 36.15.3 proved using exactly the same methods. Recall that for a closed subset $T$ of a scheme $X$ we denote $D_ T(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the strictly full, saturated, triangulated subcategory of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ consisting of objects supported on $T$ (Definition 36.6.1). We similarly denote $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ the strictly full, saturated, triangulated subcategory of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ consisting of those complexes whose cohomology sheaves are quasi-coherent and are suppported on $T$.

Lemma 36.15.4. Let $X$ be a quasi-compact and quasi-separated scheme. Let $T \subset X$ be a closed subset such that $X \setminus T$ is quasi-compact. With notation as above, the category $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ is generated by a single perfect object.

**Proof.**
We will prove this using the induction principle of Cohomology of Schemes, Lemma 30.4.1.

Assume $X = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(A)$ is affine. In this case there exist $f_1, \ldots , f_ r \in A$ such that $T = V(f_1, \ldots , f_ r)$. Let $K$ be the Koszul complex on $f_1, \ldots , f_ r$ as in Lemma 36.15.2. Then $K$ is a perfect object with cohomology supported on $T$ and hence a perfect object of $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$. On the other hand, if $E \in D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ and $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits (K, E[n]) = 0$ for all $n$, then Lemma 36.15.2 tells us that $E = Rj_*(E|_{X \setminus T}) = 0$. Hence $K$ generates $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$, (by our definition of generators of triangulated categories in Derived Categories, Definition 13.36.3).

Assume that $X = U \cup V$ is an open covering with $V$ affine and $U$ quasi-compact such that the lemma holds for $U$. Let $P$ be a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ U)$ supported on $T \cap U$ which is a generator for $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T \cap U}(\mathcal{O}_ U)$. Using Lemma 36.13.10 we may choose a perfect object $Q$ of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ supported on $T$ whose restriction to $U$ is a direct sum one of whose summands is $P$. Write $V = \mathop{\mathrm{Spec}}(B)$. Let $Z = X \setminus U$. Then $Z$ is a closed subset of $V$ such that $V \setminus Z$ is quasi-compact. As $X$ is quasi-separated, it follows that $Z \cap T$ is a closed subset of $V$ such that $W = V \setminus (Z \cap T)$ is quasi-compact. Thus we can choose $g_1, \ldots , g_ s \in B$ such that $Z \cap T = V(g_1, \ldots , g_ r)$. Let $K \in D(\mathcal{O}_ V)$ be the perfect object corresponding to the Koszul complex on $g_1, \ldots , g_ s$ over $B$. Note that since $K$ is supported on $(Z \cap T) \subset V$ closed, the pushforward $K' = R(V \to X)_*K$ is a perfect object of $D(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ whose restriction to $V$ is $K$ (see Cohomology, Lemma 20.46.10). We claim that $Q \oplus K'$ is a generator for $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$.

Let $E$ be an object of $D_{\mathit{QCoh}, T}(\mathcal{O}_ X)$ such that there are no nontrivial maps from any shift of $Q \oplus K'$ into $E$. By Cohomology, Lemma 20.33.6 we have $K' = R(V \to X)_! K$ and hence

Thus by Lemma 36.15.2 we have $E|_ V = Rj_*E|_ W$ where $j : W \to V$ is the inclusion. Picture

Since $E$ is supported on $T$ we see that $E|_ W$ is supported on $T \cap W = T \cap U \cap V$ which is closed in $W$. We conclude that

where the second equality is part (1) of Cohomology, Lemma 20.33.6. This implies that $E = R(U \to X)_*E|_ U$ (small detail omitted). If this is the case then

which contains $\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(P[n], E|_ U)$ as a direct summand. Thus by our choice of $P$ the vanishing of these groups implies that $E|_ U$ is zero. Whence $E$ is zero. $\square$

## Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like `$\pi$`

). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.

## Comments (0)