The Stacks project

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

21.33 Hom complexes

Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ and $\mathcal{M}^\bullet $ be two complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. We construct a complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules $\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet )$. Namely, for each $n$ we set

\[ \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^ n(\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) = \prod \nolimits _{n = p + q} \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits _\mathcal {O}(\mathcal{L}^{-q}, \mathcal{M}^ p) \]

It is a good idea to think of $\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^ n$ as the sheaf of $\mathcal{O}$-modules of all $\mathcal{O}$-linear maps from $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ to $\mathcal{M}^\bullet $ (viewed as graded $\mathcal{O}$-modules) which are homogenous of degree $n$. In this terminology, we define the differential by the rule

\[ \text{d}(f) = \text{d}_\mathcal {M} \circ f - (-1)^ n f \circ \text{d}_\mathcal {L} \]

for $f \in \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^ n_\mathcal {O}(\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet )$. We omit the verification that $\text{d}^2 = 0$. This construction is a special case of Differential Graded Algebra, Example 22.19.6. It follows immediately from the construction that we have

21.33.0.1
\begin{equation} \label{sites-cohomology-equation-cohomology-hom-complex} H^ n(\Gamma (U, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ))) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet [n]) \end{equation}

for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$ and every $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$. Similarly, we have

21.33.0.2
\begin{equation} \label{sites-cohomology-equation-global-cohomology-hom-complex} H^ n(\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ))) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{O})}(\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet [n]) \end{equation}

for the complex of global sections.

Lemma 21.33.1. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Given complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules there is an isomorphism

\[ \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet )) = \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\text{Tot}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet ), \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) \]

of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules functorial in $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is proved in exactly the same way as More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.1. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.2. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Given complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules there is a canonical morphism

\[ \text{Tot}\left( \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet ) \right) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) \]

of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is proved in exactly the same way as More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.2. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.3. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Given complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules there is a canonical morphism

\[ \text{Tot}(\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{K}^\bullet ) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet ), \mathcal{M}^\bullet ) \]

of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules functorial in all three complexes.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is proved in exactly the same way as More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.3. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.4. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Given complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules there is a canonical morphism

\[ \text{Tot}\left( \mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{M}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet ) \right) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{M}^\bullet , \text{Tot}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet )) \]

of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules functorial in all three complexes.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is proved in exactly the same way as More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.5. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.5. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Given complexes $\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{M}^\bullet $ of $\mathcal{O}$-modules there is a canonical morphism

\[ \mathcal{K}^\bullet \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \text{Tot}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet )) \]

of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules functorial in both complexes.

Proof. Omitted. Hint: This is proved in exactly the same way as More on Algebra, Lemma 15.67.6. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.6. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ be a K-injective complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Let $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ be a complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Then

\[ H^0(\Gamma (U, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet ))) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(L|_ U, M|_ U) \]

for all $U \in \mathop{\mathrm{Ob}}\nolimits (\mathcal{C})$. Similarly, $H^0(\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet ))) = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(L, M)$.

Proof. We have

\begin{align*} H^0(\Gamma (U, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet ))) & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(L|_ U, M|_ U) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(L|_ U, M|_ U) \end{align*}

The first equality is (21.33.0.1). The second equality is true because $\mathcal{I}^\bullet |_ U$ is K-injective by Lemma 21.21.1. The proof of the last equation is similar except that it uses (21.33.0.2). $\square$

Lemma 21.33.7. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $(\mathcal{I}')^\bullet \to \mathcal{I}^\bullet $ be a quasi-isomorphism of K-injective complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Let $(\mathcal{L}')^\bullet \to \mathcal{L}^\bullet $ be a quasi-isomorphism of complexes of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Then

\[ \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , (\mathcal{I}')^\bullet ) \longrightarrow \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet ((\mathcal{L}')^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet ) \]

is a quasi-isomorphism.

Proof. Let $M$ be the object of $D(\mathcal{O})$ represented by $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ and $(\mathcal{I}')^\bullet $. Let $L$ be the object of $D(\mathcal{O})$ represented by $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ and $(\mathcal{L}')^\bullet $. By Lemma 21.33.6 we see that the sheaves

\[ H^0(\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , (\mathcal{I}')^\bullet )) \quad \text{and}\quad H^0(\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet ((\mathcal{L}')^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet )) \]

are both equal to the sheaf associated to the presheaf

\[ U \longmapsto \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{D(\mathcal{O}_ U)}(L|_ U, M|_ U) \]

Thus the map is a quasi-isomorphism. $\square$

Lemma 21.33.8. Let $(\mathcal{C}, \mathcal{O})$ be a ringed site. Let $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ be a K-injective complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Let $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ be a K-flat complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules. Then $\mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet )$ is a K-injective complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules.

Proof. Namely, if $\mathcal{K}^\bullet $ is an acyclic complex of $\mathcal{O}$-modules, then

\begin{align*} \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{O})}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet )) & = H^0(\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{K}^\bullet , \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\mathcal{L}^\bullet , \mathcal{I}^\bullet )))) \\ & = H^0(\Gamma (\mathcal{C}, \mathop{\mathcal{H}\! \mathit{om}}\nolimits ^\bullet (\text{Tot}( \mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet ), \mathcal{I}^\bullet ))) \\ & = \mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits _{K(\mathcal{O})}( \text{Tot}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet ), \mathcal{I}^\bullet ) \\ & = 0 \end{align*}

The first equality by (21.33.0.2). The second equality by Lemma 21.33.1. The third equality by (21.33.0.2). The final equality because $\text{Tot}(\mathcal{K}^\bullet \otimes _\mathcal {O} \mathcal{L}^\bullet )$ is acyclic because $\mathcal{L}^\bullet $ is K-flat (Definition 21.18.2) and because $\mathcal{I}^\bullet $ is K-injective. $\square$


Comments (0)


Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked.

In your comment you can use Markdown and LaTeX style mathematics (enclose it like $\pi$). A preview option is available if you wish to see how it works out (just click on the eye in the toolbar).

Unfortunately JavaScript is disabled in your browser, so the comment preview function will not work.

All contributions are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.




In order to prevent bots from posting comments, we would like you to prove that you are human. You can do this by filling in the name of the current tag in the following input field. As a reminder, this is tag 0A8X. Beware of the difference between the letter 'O' and the digit '0'.