Definition 101.38.1. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a morphism of algebraic stacks. The scheme theoretic image of f is the smallest closed substack \mathcal{Z} \subset \mathcal{Y} through which f factors1.
101.38 Scheme theoretic image
Here is the definition.
We often denote f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Z} the factorization of f. If the morphism f is not quasi-compact, then (in general) the construction of the scheme theoretic image does not commute with restriction to open substacks of \mathcal{Y}. However, if f is quasi-compact then the scheme theoretic image commutes with flat base change (Lemma 101.38.5).
Lemma 101.38.2. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a morphism of algebraic stacks. Let g : \mathcal{W} \to \mathcal{X} be a morphism of algebraic stacks which is surjective, flat, and locally of finite presentation. Then the scheme theoretic image of f exists if and only if the scheme theoretic image of f \circ g exists and if so then these scheme theoretic images are the same.
Proof. Assume \mathcal{Z} \subset \mathcal{Y} is a closed substack and f \circ g factors through \mathcal{Z}. To prove the lemma it suffices to show that f factors through \mathcal{Z}. Consider a scheme T and a morphism T \to \mathcal{X} given by an object x of the fibre category of \mathcal{X} over T. We will show that f(x) is in fact in the fibre category of \mathcal{Z} over T. Namely, the projection T \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{W} \to T is a surjective, flat, locally finitely presented morphism. Hence there is an fppf covering \{ T_ i \to T\} such that T_ i \to T factors through T \times _\mathcal {X} \mathcal{W} \to T for all i. Then T_ i \to \mathcal{X} factors through \mathcal{W} and hence T_ i \to \mathcal{Y} factors through \mathcal{Z}. Thus x|_{T_ i} is an object of \mathcal{Z}. Since \mathcal{Z} is a strictly full substack, we conclude that x is an object of \mathcal{Z} as desired. \square
Lemma 101.38.3. Let f : \mathcal{Y} \to \mathcal{X} be a morphism of algebraic stacks. Then the scheme theoretic image of f exists.
Proof. Choose a scheme V and a surjective smooth morphism V \to \mathcal{Y}. By Lemma 101.38.2 we may replace \mathcal{Y} by V. Thus it suffices to show that if X \to \mathcal{X} is a morphism from a scheme to an algebraic stack, then the scheme theoretic image exists. Choose a scheme U and a surjective smooth morphism U \to \mathcal{X}. Set R = U \times _\mathcal {X} U. We have \mathcal{X} = [U/R] by Algebraic Stacks, Lemma 94.16.2. By Properties of Stacks, Lemma 100.9.11 the closed substacks \mathcal{Z} of \mathcal{X} are in 1-to-1 correspondence with R-invariant closed subschemes Z \subset U. Let Z_1 \subset U be the scheme theoretic image of X \times _\mathcal {X} U \to U. Observe that X \to \mathcal{X} factors through \mathcal{Z} if and only if X \times _\mathcal {X} U \to U factors through the corresponding R-invariant closed subscheme Z (details omitted; hint: this follows because X \times _\mathcal {X} U \to X is surjective and smooth). Thus we have to show that there exists a smallest R-invariant closed subscheme Z \subset U containing Z_1.
Let \mathcal{I}_1 \subset \mathcal{O}_ U be the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf corresponding to the closed subscheme Z_1 \subset U. Let Z_\alpha , \alpha \in A be the set of all R-invariant closed subschemes of U containing Z_1. For \alpha \in A, let \mathcal{I}_\alpha \subset \mathcal{O}_ U be the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf corresponding to the closed subscheme Z_\alpha \subset U. The containment Z_1 \subset Z_\alpha means \mathcal{I}_\alpha \subset \mathcal{I}_1. The R-invariance of Z_\alpha means that
as (quasi-coherent) ideal sheaves on (the algebraic space) R. Consider the image
Since direct sums of quasi-coherent sheaves are quasi-coherent and since images of maps between quasi-coherent sheaves are quasi-coherent, we find that \mathcal{I} is quasi-coherent. Since pull back is exact and commutes with direct sums we find
Hence \mathcal{I} defines an R-invariant closed subscheme Z \subset U which is contained in every Z_\alpha and contains Z_1 as desired. \square
Lemma 101.38.4. Let
be a commutative diagram of algebraic stacks. Let \mathcal{Z}_ i \subset \mathcal{Y}_ i, i = 1, 2 be the scheme theoretic image of f_ i. Then the morphism \mathcal{Y}_1 \to \mathcal{Y}_2 induces a morphism \mathcal{Z}_1 \to \mathcal{Z}_2 and a commutative diagram
Proof. The scheme theoretic inverse image of \mathcal{Z}_2 in \mathcal{Y}_1 is a closed substack of \mathcal{Y}_1 through which f_1 factors. Hence \mathcal{Z}_1 is contained in this. This proves the lemma. \square
Lemma 101.38.5. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a quasi-compact morphism of algebraic stacks. Then formation of the scheme theoretic image commutes with flat base change.
Proof. Let \mathcal{Y}' \to \mathcal{Y} be a flat morphism of algebraic stacks. Choose a scheme V and a surjective smooth morphism V \to \mathcal{Y}. Choose a scheme V' and a surjective smooth morphism V' \to \mathcal{Y}' \times _\mathcal {Y} V. We may and do assume that V = \coprod _{i \in I} V_ i is a disjoint union of affine schemes and that V' = \coprod _{i \in I} \coprod _{j \in J_ i} V_{i, j} is a disjoint union of affine schemes with each V_{i, j} mapping into V_ i. Let
\mathcal{Z} \subset \mathcal{Y} be the scheme theoretic image of f,
\mathcal{Z}' \subset \mathcal{Y}' be the scheme theoretic image of the base change of f by \mathcal{Y}' \to \mathcal{Y},
Z \subset V be the scheme theoretic image of the base change of f by V \to \mathcal{Y},
Z' \subset V' be the scheme theoretic image of the base change of f by V' \to \mathcal{Y}.
If we can show that (a) Z = V \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{Z}, (b) Z' = V' \times _{\mathcal{Y}'} \mathcal{Z}', and (c) Z' = V' \times _ V Z then the lemma follows: the inclusion \mathcal{Z}' \to \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} \mathcal{Y}' (Lemma 101.38.4) has to be an isomorphism because after base change by the surjective smooth morphism V' \to \mathcal{Y}' it is.
Proof of (a). Set R = V \times _\mathcal {Y} V. By Properties of Stacks, Lemma 100.9.11 the rule \mathcal{Z} \mapsto \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} V defines a 1-to-1 correspondence between closed substacks of \mathcal{Y} and R-invariant closed subspaces of V. Moreover, f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} factors through \mathcal{Z} if and only if the base change g : \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V \to V factors through \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} V. We claim: the scheme theoretic image Z \subset V of g is R-invariant. The claim implies (a) by what we just said.
For each i the morphism \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V_ i \to V_ i is quasi-compact and hence \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V_ i is quasi-compact. Thus we can choose an affine scheme W_ i and a surjective smooth morphism W_ i \to \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V_ i. Observe that W = \coprod W_ i is a scheme endowed with a smooth and surjective morphism W \to \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V such that the composition W \to V with g is quasi-compact. Let Z \to V be the scheme theoretic image of W \to V, see Morphisms, Section 29.6 and Morphisms of Spaces, Section 67.16. It follows from Lemma 101.38.2 that Z \subset V is the scheme theoretic image of g. To show that Z is R-invariant we claim that both
are the scheme theoretic image of \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} R \to R. Namely, we first use Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.30.12 to see that \text{pr}_0^{-1}(Z) is the scheme theoretic image of the composition
Since the first arrow here is surjective and smooth we see that \text{pr}_0^{-1}(Z) is the scheme theoretic image of \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} R \to R. The same argument applies that \text{pr}_1^{-1}(Z). Hence Z is R-invariant.
Statement (b) is proved in exactly the same way as one proves (a).
Proof of (c). Let Z_ i \subset V_ i be the scheme theoretic image of \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V_ i \to V_ i and let Z_{i, j} \subset V_{i, j} be the scheme theoretic image of \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V_{i, j} \to V_{i, j}. Clearly it suffices to show that the inverse image of Z_ i in V_{i, j} is Z_{i, j}. Above we've seen that Z_ i is the scheme theoretic image of W_ i \to V_ i and by the same token Z_{i, j} is the scheme theoretic image of W_ i \times _{V_ i} V_{i, j} \to V_{i, j}. Hence the equality follows from the case of schemes (Morphisms, Lemma 29.25.16) and the fact that V_{i, j} \to V_ i is flat. \square
Lemma 101.38.6. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a quasi-compact morphism of algebraic stacks. Let \mathcal{Z} \subset \mathcal{Y} be the scheme theoretic image of f. Then |\mathcal{Z}| is the closure of the image of |f|.
Proof. Let z \in |\mathcal{Z}| be a point. Choose an affine scheme V, a point v \in V, and a smooth morphism V \to \mathcal{Y} mapping v to z. Then \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V is a quasi-compact algebraic stack. Hence we can find an affine scheme W and a surjective smooth morphism W \to \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V. By Lemma 101.38.5 the scheme theoretic image of \mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V \to V is Z = \mathcal{Z} \times _\mathcal {Y} V. Hence the inverse image of |\mathcal{Z}| in |V| is |Z| by Properties of Stacks, Lemma 100.4.3. By Lemma 101.38.2 Z is the scheme theoretic image of W \to V. By Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.16.3 we see that the image of |W| \to |Z| is dense. Hence the image of |\mathcal{X} \times _\mathcal {Y} V| \to |Z| is dense. Observe that v \in Z. Since |V| \to |\mathcal{Y}| is open, a topology argument tells us that z is in the closure of the image of |f| as desired. \square
Lemma 101.38.7. Let f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y} be a morphism of algebraic stacks which is representable by algebraic spaces and separated. Let \mathcal{V} \subset \mathcal{Y} be an open substack such that \mathcal{V} \to \mathcal{Y} is quasi-compact. Let s : \mathcal{V} \to \mathcal{X} be a morphism such that f \circ s = \text{id}_\mathcal {V}. Let \mathcal{Y}' be the scheme theoretic image of s. Then \mathcal{Y}' \to \mathcal{Y} is an isomorphism over \mathcal{V}.
Proof. By Lemma 101.7.7 the morphism s : \mathcal{V} \to \mathcal{Y} is quasi-compact. Hence the construction of the scheme theoretic image \mathcal{Y}' of s commutes with flat base change by Lemma 101.38.5. Thus to prove the lemma we may assume \mathcal{Y} is representable by an algebraic space and we reduce to the case of algebraic spaces which is Morphisms of Spaces, Lemma 67.16.7. \square
Comments (0)